Analysis Of Carl Von Clausewitz's Views On War

Improved Essays
There are many differing opinions on war and the motivation to fight in it. In Carl von Clausewitz’s famous document, On War, he goes in depth about his specific views on war. Clausewitz says that the ideology that people feel for the war is what motivates them to fight and this motivation is in direct correlation with the violence in the war, but I believe that it is people’s desire for change that motivates them to fight in the war. Though Clausewitz makes good points throughout On War, I believe that he missed this one. When people are not pleased with their current environment or with something that has happened, they want it to change. It is this passion and desire for change that motivates the people to actually take a stand. Just because …show more content…
The people against slavery were called abolitionists. The abolitionists believed that slavery was wrong and evil. The south argued that blacks were similar to children and could not care for themselves. The north argued against slavery and “the voices of Northern abolitionists… became increasingly violent” (“Slavery in the United States” 2014). The south tried to say that slaves were happy, but educated, heartfelt attacks on slavery written by people like escaped-slave Frederick Douglass said otherwise. The treatment of slaves varied depending on the owner, but families of slaves being separated and punishments like whipping was common.
Though the war may have started as a way to preserve the Union which was breaking after the election of an anti-slavery President, Abraham Lincoln, it turned into a war that would decide the fate of slavery (“Slavery in the United States” 2014). The desire for change is what caused the civil war. The people of the northern states recognized that slavery should not be legal while the southern states wanted to expand slavery to the west. This drastic difference in opinion was the motivation for the war. If the abolitionists were not so passionate about a change in slavery, then the Civil war would not have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many have questioned, what was the cause of the Civil War? Some may say it was because of the difference of the North and South socially, industrial and agricultural differences, taxation, or state rights. The real reason of Civil War was over slavery. Slavery was starting to become an issue in America during the 1800s. Northerners wanted to abolish it but Southerners on the other hand, strongly agreed to slavery.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Expansion Of Slavery

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a result, plantation owners began to think spreading the slaves out would decrease the rebellious atmosphere. The Kansas-Nebraska act stated that the Missouri Compromise had to be repealed because it did not give the southern portion of the United States enough or equal opportunity compared to the north. This act can be linked as one of the main factors in the creating of the civil war and national sectionalism amongst the north and the south. Sectional division in the Kansas and Nebraska territories began to boil over when anti-slavery sentiments dominated the land. People like Eli Turner wanted to ensure that slavery would not be spread beyond the south.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The south also thought that this was going to influence Lincoln’s decisions over the issue, which many were right to believe for his “growing opposition led him to introduce a law that gradually ended slavery” (Smith). Even though, it gained little support the south viewed this as a preview as to what was going to come in the future if they did not surrender to the north. For putting Lincoln, in charge the blame for the start of the war laid on the Republican Party for they imposed conditions that could not be fulfilled. The south felt threatened and thought “the only way to save slavery was to secede” (Dickinson). The South cornered the Union to respond to a greater conflict on top of slavery.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1800’s, the constitution was suppose to establish America as one nation, but instead the constitution created sectional discord and tension and contributed to the failure of the Union. Slavery in the 1800’s was exceedingly cruel, African Americans were thought of as property, were not allowed to have rights,were kept in horrendous living conditions and were treated unfairly. Sectionalism, when one’s views are based on where they are from, divided America into two sections, the north who opposed slavery and the south who supported slavery. Citizens were typically proud of where they were from and stayed loyal to their region. The American Government questioned if slavery should have been deemed unconstitutional in the Constitution,…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Social Changes

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The North, however, opposed to the concept of slavery. The argument over slavery escalated into a political scale. This caused the two societies to have contrasting views on how the government should be operated. Southerners feared that the culture that they had built would be ruined, and feared of slave uprising. While, “Northerners believed that slavery would escape from Dixie and corrupt and possibly break down the political and constitutional system” (xxiv).…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this fact was more shadowed by how worried he was for the effect slavery had on whites (Preston, 2012). For Lincoln the idea of slavery and how it morally changed his fellow man was of more concern than the freedom of the slaves. Prior to the war Lincoln was engaged in trying to end slavery. He voted and advocated against…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the novel, the author concentrates on the South and their reasons for rebelling against the Union. One reason that is argued in this paper is that the South rebelled because they believed that the Union was infringing on their rights as a state and was contradicting the constitution. Through this argument, the Confederacy orchestrated a plan to appeal to the lower class and spur the nation toward war. Another argument made in the paper is that Abraham Lincoln didn 't pursue the eradication of slavery, but wanted to stop the progression of slavery in the South to eventually weed out the institution of slavery. These arguments are made through the reading of the novel.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, who would work the plantations if African slaves could become wage earners like many white laborers? Certainly, an egalitarian society was not in the most profitable interests of white slave owners, especially in the eyes of southern commissioners that argued in favor of secession to combat the federalist ploys to end slavery: “The impending imposition of racial equality informed speeches of other commissioners as well, [especially in the case of] Thomas J. Wharton, Mississippi’s attorney general and the state’s commissioner to Tennessee (Dew 56). In this manner, commissioners in the Deep South viewed the northern federalist government as a threat to the southern way of life, which always revolved around the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movement was made to help the blacks become free and stop slavery from spreading. This abolition furthered the drift of North and South, because the movement was seen as a threat to the South and as abolitionists trying to destroy their way of life. The South started to grow in disagreement when the north stopped obeying the Fugitive Slave Act, which required any northerners to return slaves found back to his or her plantation. The disobedience occurred because northerners saw slavery as morally wrong, and if they would return slaves back to his or her plantation, they would be directly putting someone into slavery. The South felt that “when security in this is shaken, all other property partakes of its instability” and started to fear the Abolition Movement.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War began because of the differences between the slave states and the free slave states to end slavery. The abolitionist movement began in the North, which caused the country to split into North and South. The North and the South fought over constitutional rights because liberty was not defined the same between the North and the South. People in the South supported slavery and not abolition, which led to the Civil War. The South fought for freedom and the North fought for ideals for the constitution.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays