I remember waking up in 2014, turned on the radio, or watched the news on TV, and heard once again a child in California was sent home from school sick and later diagnosed with measles a very contagious disease. I remember asking myself; why weren’t these children immunized at birth, or why the government did not mandate them to be vaccinated? From the inception of vaccines in the eighteenth century, a few citizenry have questioned the technique as unnatural then again unsafe, particularly since it is performed on generally healthy individuals; in like manner, some people object to all government mandatory regarding personal life history. These complaints have been a piece of general banters among communities and in administrative chambers
…show more content…
Jennifer Ehreth. “The global value of vaccination”. Vaccine. 2003; 596-600.
4. Douglas S Diekema, Edgar K Marcuse. Ethical issues in the vaccination of children. Public Health Ethics: Theory, Policy and Practice. Oxford University Press; 2007. p.279-88.
Opponents of the bill, assembled their contentions against vaccination on strong faith or religion. Some also claim youth illnesses were not seen as a risk, but rather as a feature of the regular method to fortify their body and to gain a “natural” and thus strong immunity.5
Parents understand vaccination as a simulated interruption into the natural evolution of the immune system and fear overloading the still immature immune system of their young children and infants through vaccination. Streefland validates that there is a trend, particularly among well-educated parent in Europe and the U.S.A. to believe in safekeeping good health by maintaining bodily balances and gaining immunity in a natural way.5
Vaccines are prophylactic and effective. On the other hand, they are neither flawlessly safe nor perfectly successful. Most adverse outcomes associated with vaccines are minor and include local soreness or redness at the infusion site or maybe fever for a day. With the minor side effects and implications it makes sense to vaccinate children at birth to prevent them from contracting preventable
Jennifer Ehreth. “The global value of vaccination”. Vaccine. 2003; 596-600.
4. Douglas S Diekema, Edgar K Marcuse. Ethical issues in the vaccination of children. Public Health Ethics: Theory, Policy and Practice. Oxford University Press; 2007. p.279-88.
Opponents of the bill, assembled their contentions against vaccination on strong faith or religion. Some also claim youth illnesses were not seen as a risk, but rather as a feature of the regular method to fortify their body and to gain a “natural” and thus strong immunity.5
Parents understand vaccination as a simulated interruption into the natural evolution of the immune system and fear overloading the still immature immune system of their young children and infants through vaccination. Streefland validates that there is a trend, particularly among well-educated parent in Europe and the U.S.A. to believe in safekeeping good health by maintaining bodily balances and gaining immunity in a natural way.5
Vaccines are prophylactic and effective. On the other hand, they are neither flawlessly safe nor perfectly successful. Most adverse outcomes associated with vaccines are minor and include local soreness or redness at the infusion site or maybe fever for a day. With the minor side effects and implications it makes sense to vaccinate children at birth to prevent them from contracting preventable