Twelve Angry Men Team Analysis

Improved Essays
There are four elements that have impact on a highly functioning team. These are context, composition, competency and the change managements skills of a team. In the movie Twelve Angry Men, the effectiveness can be viewed in several different ways. In terms of context the team struggles with the physical environment, as well as the emotional and cultural environment The composition of the team was very varied and came from a variety of different occupations. Because to this diverse background, some of the jurors were better suited for the task at hand. It became obvious that as time moved on, some of the team members were better versed at managing change as well. Within the effectiveness of the group other factors play an important role as well. There are also very important competencies that teams must have. Conflict management, group dynamics, decision making, influence and stereotyping all play a part in how competently a team can work. …show more content…
There was no deep level of trust for each, and therefore the viewed each other with suspicion. The team really spent very little time getting to know one another, or to access the strengths of each other, so they really could not have a good appreciation for what each of their skill sets brought to the table. Additionally, there was weak leadership which caused confusion in the team about who should be doing what activity. Initially when conflict is introduced, the jury members attempted to gang up against juror number eight who is seen as the source of disagreement. Juror number three is constantly trying to control the outcome, and continues to be hostile towards the team in an effort to get them to agree with his opinion. Other members of the team either choose the side of juror eight or juror three. These two became more the focal point of the argument, and it became more of a power struggle between the two at least in the eyes of juror number

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    All the other jurors were united for different reasons in the belief that the defendant was guilty. Juror 8 forces the group to carefully examine all the evidence to be sure there isn’t any reasonable doubt, he believes the defendant deserves, at the very least a jury that took the time necessary to carry out justice. The first tactic juror 8 uses is silence, watching the other jurors to get a glimpse of their thought processes and to figure out their belief system that provides the foundation to their argument against innocence. Juror 8 forms alliances whenever possible, an example of this is when he was the only one to take a cough drop from juror 2. Through investigating the facts and brainstorming possible alternatives to arguments against the possibility of innocence juror 8 slowly wins over the other jurors.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Managers tend to overlook the internal dynamics of a team because of their focus on the external factors influencing task performances. Furthermore, there is a misconception between several organizations that a team can be successful in operations if the team leader is competent and skillful. However, the truth lies in the fact that a team leader can only be as efficient as his team members. If a manager does…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many different effective persuasive elements in Twelve Angry Men. Within this group are many very different people, some of them which are leaders and some are not. Juror #8 was the most influential, intelligent of them all in the trial, he was the one that would question everything he heard, the had the mind that would take a little piece of evidence and turn it around on the other jurors.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At one point the Foreman notes that the conversation is getting out of hand and says “Ok, let’s stop the yelling. who’s got something constructive to say?”(27). This is immediately acted upon by all the Jurors because no one really wants to be there longer than they have to. The most important difference to note here is that nobody wants to spend an excessive amount of time there, but they are also not willing to sacrifice their personal beliefs to leave sooner which is an important distinction to…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Don't try to make yourself believe in something that didn't happen. For example in the play " twelve angry men" Reginald Rose include these two witnesses with reasonable doubt. There was an old woman and old man who made themselves believe in things they didn't actually see. First the play mentioned the old man in scene one. In this scene it states why the old man made himself believe in what he saw and heard.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror eight has very good observation skills. He almost is a detective juror, he seeks answers and he is good at creating scenarios to find answers. Juror eight gave his reason why he had doubt still, and why the other eleven should look the case over more. Juror eight then wanted to take another vote. He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This small factor made many jurors frustrated and cranky, including Juror 7. For example, the text,…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the facilitator called for a vote once they reached their discussion goal. The vote resulted in more jurors changing their mind. The facilitator established a pattern that worked for the group. They would have a group discussion, playout a scenario, discuss the scenario, and then vote. This process proved to be very productive.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Members of the jury began to get agitated and upset. Members are frustrated because a unanimous vote must be made and the changes in votes causes more confusion. A juror attacks the man who grew up in the slums as he accuses him of changing his vote, and finds out it was another juror who is beginning to understand and listen to the architect. There is an obvious expressed struggle as the architect really challenges and suggests that the “information should be just that accurate if we’re going to send him to the chair.” In my opinion, most of the conflict was constructive as the thoughts of the group began to change.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Juror nine is the old man with a quiet nature, but with an insightful remarks. He is the supporter-encourager of the group because he lets juror eight speak his mind without any judgement. Even though his votes were different than juror eight, the old man believes every person should have their opinions heard out especially a person like juror eight who is taking a stand on his own. Juror ten is the garage owner who has regular anger outburst like juror three the angry father.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is uncommon to observe somebody who likes to be compelled to be some place or accomplish something they don 't have a longing to do. In, 12 Angry Men, we are given only that. Twelve men, of every single different backgrounds and experiences are told they must spend their own valuable time to judge a man on the premise of evidence that was presented to them. Gladding would call this kind of group an errand/work aggregate. This sort of group meets up to finish amass undertaking objectives.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Other jurors just couldn 't believe and got mad that juror #8 voted not guilty. Once juror #8 convinces the rest of the jury to discuss it further before they make a decision, the personal bias of some of the jurors really came out. For example juror #10 comes out and says, “I don’t mind telling you this, mister. We don’t owe him a thing. He got a fair trial, didn’t he?…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the second vote, Juror 9 says “It takes a great deal of courage to stand alone even when you believe in something very strongly” (Rose and Sergel 28). For example, the jury ignores Juror 3 because of his inconsideration towards them. Finally, by the end of the play, many jurors stopped listening to the men who were not civil. In fact, Juror 3 repeatedly accused many jurors of lying, which is where he lost the other’s vote. Juror 8’s calm nature favored the jury's attention.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays