Manhattan Project Team Case Study

Prompt #1: What three key elements form the internal dynamics of a team? Why do you think managers often tend to overlook internal dynamics when team-building? What are some of the consequences of neglecting internal dynamics in a team?
The three key elements, which form the internal dynamics of a team, are tasks, people and processes. Managers tend to overlook the internal dynamics of a team because of their focus on the external factors influencing task performances. Furthermore, there is a misconception between several organizations that a team can be successful in operations if the team leader is competent and skillful. However, the truth lies in the fact that a team leader can only be as efficient as his team members. If a manager does …show more content…
The Manhattan Project team was goal-oriented as this was in the field of science, driven by a group of scientists who genuinely enjoyed working in their field and were skilled. Moreover, the team leader of the project, who recruited the scientists, focused on group cohesion and maintaining the internal dynamics of the group in order to maintain a level of order and efficiency. In essence, this led to the building of trust amongst the members of the team, regardless of their past, and ensured that the team members had a similar objective in mind. Furthermore, the team members were diverse in their skills and specific specialties, but this did not hinder their …show more content…
Furthermore, cohesive teams tend to be more productive and also vice versa. Team leaders can use the following methods to create group cohesion: focus on the similarities between team members, create challenges which require teamwork, create easy ways for the team to be close, and put a positive spin on the team’s performance. (Thompson, 2014, pp.