Twelve Angry Men: Movie Analysis

Improved Essays
According to the B A 321 textbook, facilitation is the set of activities carried out before, during, and after meetings to help a group achieve its own outcomes. A facilitator is someone who performs these activities, helping the team by monitoring and improving its internal process. Twelve Angry Men, a movie about an open-and-shut murder trial in which one juror stands alone in his beliefs, made use of facilitation. When the twelve jurors were sent to deliberate a unanimous verdict, the case was not as clear-cut as they once thought. The jurors were made up of twelve men of diverse backgrounds. Their choice would either send an 18-year-old Hispanic man to death or set him free. When the twelve men were locked in the deliberation room, the jury foreman acted as the facilitator for the group. It was the jury foreman that got everyone focused for the initial vote. It was important get everyone focused because the group was busy discussing their personal life, occupations, and their future plans. They were not discussing the case because they assumed everyone would vote the same. The foreman had …show more content…
Even though many of the jurors still thought the man was guilty. They still engaged in the discussion. The discussion then shifted towards playing out the scenario. It was at this point that, jurors started to change their minds. Hey could have replayed the same scenario over and over again. However, the facilitator called for a vote once they reached their discussion goal. The vote resulted in more jurors changing their mind. The facilitator established a pattern that worked for the group. They would have a group discussion, playout a scenario, discuss the scenario, and then vote. This process proved to be very productive. The end result was a unanimous jury decision. Facilitation allowed the group to stay focused on the task at hand and save an innocent man’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the film, 12 Angry Men, twelve disgruntled, sweat-covered jurymen are debating the verdict of a murder case. The audience gets unique insight into the deliberation of an emotionally-charged case. A young boy is accused of murdering his abusive father in their apartment and then fleeing the scene. The jury raises vital questions about the case that will ultimately form their decision. They must agree unanimously to either acquit the boy of his father’s murder or to send him to the electric chair.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This case study is over the film 12 Angry Men, revolving around the verdict of a murder case and the 12 jurors charged with making the decision. The jury is comprised of middle aged men or older from various occupations, cultures, and backgrounds. One particular juror is the only member of the jury willing to avoid a snap decision that is pressured by the remaining jurors to get out early. He leads the discussion amongst the other jurors playing devil’s advocate to their guilty verdicts. As the events progress each point brought up in the court hearing is analyzed deeper from multiple angles causing the jurors to accept the challenge of convicting or acquitting the young man on trial with a fair and just verdict.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film 12 Angry Men is about a jury who struggles to set aside their individual prejudices to determine the guilt or innocence of a man accused of premeditated murder. The main character is juror #8 who is played by Henry Fonda. The film focuses on labeling theory and how that influences a juror’s opinions and thoughts. It is extremely interesting to watch how most of the jurors had their minds made up about the case even before deliberation; however, as the film progresses the jurors stop labeling the defendant and instead make their verdict decision based on facts. The audience can see from this film that labeling an individual in the 1950’s might have been common, and unfortunately I believe that it still exists in today’s…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Film Analysis

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the film, 12 Angry Men, many of the jurors had task roles within the group. Juror 8 played the role of energizer. According to Zastrow (2015), the energizer, “Stimulates a higher quality of work from the group” (p. 84). Instead of letting all the men vote guilty, he made them question their decision. He brought up key points that made them dig deep into the case, and look at the situation from different perspectives.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Twelve Angry Men is a film about a jury of twelve men who are assessing a murder trial. The trial’s outcome would determine if an 18 year would be sentenced to death. The men went into the jury room with an assumption that the defendant was guilty. They did an open vote where everyone raised their hands to determine who felt he was guilty or not guilty. Every juror, but one, raised their hands for guilty, some of the jurors slowly raised their hands after seeing the rest of the room raise their hand.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the movie 12 Angry Men, a young man is on trial for murdering his father. The movie opens at a point in the trial after the witnesses have testified, and the prosecution and defense have had their say. It is now up to the twelve men of the jury to decide the fate of the defendant. In this particular case if he is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death by the electric chair. The jury go in to the jury room, sit down, and take a vote.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He then decides to recreate what the elderly man said he did on the night of the murder. Juror #2 seems really interested in this argument and even volunteers to help with the timing of the experiment. In the beginning of Act 2, the jury decides to vote once more. At the time, Juror #2’s vote was “not guilty.” Even though Juror #2 changes his vote to “not guilty,”…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Group Analysis

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Here also it has been strongly depicted that the group dynamics play ahighly important role in changing the mindset of its members. For example the character playedby PankajKapur was very stringent and stubborn for most of the part of the movie, but the groupwas successful in changing his perception regarding the new generation. I would start the teambuilding process in the movie from the beginning.2. Facilitating better group effectiveness by honing every member’s decision makingabilities: at the beginning of the discussion 11 out of 12 jurors considered the accused to beguilty of murdering his father. The final decision made later shows that even after so manysessions in the court many issues were left unexplored.…

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    At the beginning he took charge in organizing and starting the discussion, and kept stuff in control and running. He didn't shout or disrupt, instead he waited his turn to speak and did so in a civil manner. Another instance of a leader was juror 8. Even when everyone was against his decision and was yelling at him, he didn't give in as he was confident in his reasons why the boy was not guilty. He did not switch sides during the whole debate and could prove his point through numerous examples and scenarios.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror Number Eight In Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry Men, Juror Number Eight brings his own unique perspective to the drama. His participation leads to the jury making its final decision. Juror Number Eight is a strong and compassionate man. He stands for what he believes in even if that means that he is standing alone. Through being kind, being open, and thoughtful conversation, Juror Number Eight helps to shape the final resolution in a difficult murder case.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays