The Importance Of Civility In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
Civility will encourage your opponents to keep listening to you.

The play Twelve Angry Men shows that civility is important. By the end of the play, the jurors were willing to listen to the people who were the most rational. Juror 8 calmly took the others' ideas into account, which swayed the jury to favor not guilty. At first, the jury thinks the boy is guilty, but Juror 8 used relaxed tactics to change their minds. One of the last jurors to change his mind was Juror 3. In the beginning, he seemed unconvinced, but eventually, he Juror 8’s point unravel his prejudice. In addition, because of Juror 8’s civility, many jurors respected him. Juror 9 was one of the first jurors to show respect for Juror 8. Before the second vote, Juror 9 says “It takes a great deal of courage to stand alone even when you believe in something very strongly” (Rose and Sergel 28). For example, the jury ignores Juror 3 because of his inconsideration towards them. Finally, by the end of the play, many jurors stopped listening to the men who were not civil. In fact, Juror 3 repeatedly accused many jurors of lying, which is where he lost the other’s vote. Juror 8’s calm nature favored the jury's attention.
…show more content…
The jury judged the accused of living in the slums, looking like a killer, and being old enough to murder someone. Throughout the play, Jurors 3 and 10 constantly refer to what people of the accused’s “kind” do. For example, he says, “You’re not going to tell us that we’re supposed to believe him, knowing what he is. I’ve lived among ‘em all my life. You can’t believe a word they say” (Rose and Sergel 16). This statement proves that he has based his decision on people who live in the “slums” as reckless and untruthful. It wasn’t until Juror 8 had played out the scenarios that the other jurors could eliminate their decision based on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He is racism, not proper thinker, abusive, prejudice, arrogant, insensitive and biased. Most of jurors doesn't like him based on his opinion and speech was disturbs the rest of juror. Changes his mind when all the others jurors are against him and specifically when jury 4 tells him to keep quite and not to speak. Juror 11 was interested to be a jury because he has witnessed great injustices that happen before. He was described as a good decision maker, rational thinker, supportive, team player, open-minded, agreeable and good natured.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why would he lie? What’s he got to gain, Nine: Attention maybe?” Eight makes a good statement when saying that the Old man’s view doesn’t make sense due to the El train blocking his view and hearing. Nine tends to agree with Eight saying that the old ma In the beginning of the play almost every Juror in the room picks “Guilty” except for Juror Eight. He believes that the boy is “Not-Guilty” saying that the evidence is somewhat false. Of course the other Jurors don’t believe it.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not a permanent solution though, and people go back to thinking that he is innocent. As a result he only gets more angry with juror eight and makes him think that the kid is guilty. Overall, juror number three is an angry man who only believes what he’s told himself to make him feel better. He only appreciates the opinions that he has believed all his life. He yells at people a lot when someone disagrees with him.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This wasn 't because he definitely thought the boy was not guilty, he said he didn 't know whether he was or not which is considered a reasonable doubt. This set a lot of the jurors off because a lot of them just wanted everything to be done so they could go home. Other jurors just couldn 't believe and got mad that juror #8 voted not guilty. Once juror #8 convinces the rest of the jury to discuss it further before they make a decision, the personal bias of some of the jurors really came out. For example juror #10 comes out and says, “I don’t mind telling you this, mister.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The majority of the jurors did not follow ‘innocent until proven guilty’, rather, they worked the opposite way. This is due to their personal biases. Under Juror 8’s influence, the men began ’talking for an hour’ using ‘reasonable doubt’, thus allowing the men to reach a sensible conclusion. This may have otherwise cost the life of a minor. The film exposes through Juror 8 that the superficial evidence should be dismissed to allow for deeper analysis of the case.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Any viewer is automatically going to take his side because of the clever way they put the series together, playing on all the naïve viewers emotions. The series leaves out a lot of evidence, for example: the interview with his ex-girlfriend, Jodi Stokowski. They also left out how Halbach had told her boss a few days before she went to Avery’s property, she didn’t want to go back because she was “creeped out” after speaking with him. I think this says it all really. Even One of Steven Avery’s lawyers (Dean Strang) said, “I really hope Steven is guilty, because the thought of an innocent man in jail for something he didn’t do, is TERIFYING.” This just shows us, even Steven’s own lawyer doesn’t know the truth!…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Skeptical one stayed on the not responsible side until the very last discussion day due to doubts. The Angry one yelled a lot and was very passionate. He did end up helping convince jurors but it was also hard to follow him since everyone else was wrong in his eyes. In 12 Angry Men, Juror #3 was not receptive to anyone else’s ideas. He has his opinion and is unwilling or unable to discuss with others.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He saw that his coercive power was not working. In each clip of the movie, the Cougher always voted guilty. He verbalized and used gestures to express his opinion of the groups vote. In the end, after other key points of evidence where introduced, the Cougher changed his vote to not guilty. 12 Angry Men Movie Clip (The Group) As the scene begins, the Foreman has exercised a transition in power, from legitimate power to referent power.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To begin with, when Tom felt bad for Mayella the whole courtroom was shocked. To explain this in more detail, when Tom says, ““Yes suh, I felt right sorry for her”” (264), and then Scout thinks, “Below us nobody liked Tom Robinsons answer” (264). This means that although Tom Robinson might have more money, works harder, and is more respected in the black society, he’s still black, and that’s below any white person, and since the society thinks you can’t pity anyone higher than you, they got offended. In fact, when the court session was over, the jury and the audience knew Tom wasn’t guilty, but voted that he was. To prove this statement, during Atticus’ final statement he says, ““This case is as simple as black and white.”” (271), and ““The defendant is not guilty, but somebody in this courtroom is.”” (271).…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Appearing on Netflix on December 18th, 2015, the popular show Making A Murder defines how one man is convicted of a murder he has not committed. Steven Avery, the man accused – or even framed – has government officials constantly attacking him for crimes he has not perpetrated. Avery has experienced this one other time; he is the target of every possible murder in Wisconsin state. Government officials are mistrusted, the harmless is wrongly alleged, and the Avery family name is destroyed. The same event happens within Arthur Miller’s depiction of the Salem Witch Trials in The Crucible.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays