Turnkey International Case Study

Superior Essays
As an arbitrator for Turnkey International, I will be responsible for challenging the selection of an arbitrator by Kardashia during a tribunal to resolve the dispute involving Turnkey International and Kardashia. This is based on my knowledge of the criteria for selecting an arbitrator and the circumstances under which an arbitrator can be challenged. The act of Kardashias of selecting one of the people that worked as a consultant with them as an arbitrator in the case is considered a violation of the criteria for selecting an arbitrator. The fact that the arbitrator had worked with the company implies that his impartiality in the tribunal can be greatly affected by his relations with the Kardashias. According to Redfern and Hunter (914) an …show more content…
The court will then scrutinize the residence of the witness being challenged, his or her place of work and the relationship with the parties to a tribunal. The court has the right to make a decision regarding exclusion of the arbitrator from the tribunal or retention of the arbitrator. In addition, article 29 of ICC rules states that an award may be challenged if there are errors such as clerical, computation and any error associated with the award. This implies that if the name of the witness was included in the award, it can be corrected based on this article. The affected party will be

required to submit comments relating to the complaints within 30 days following the application. A decision can then be taken by court to correct the award to take the form that satisfies the contract between the two parties.

When comparing UNCITRAL rules and ICC rules of arbitration, I would use ICC rules of arbitration because it provides me with a particular time period that makes my application to challenge the selection of a witness valid. It also authorizes me to file an application for challenging the selection of a witness even after the award, while UNCITRAL rules do not allow me to challenge a witness after an award.
…show more content…
The challenger shall then be required to notify other parties about the decision to challenge the arbitrator. When the other parties agree that the challenged arbitrator should be withdrawn from the tribunal, the challenged arbitrator has no option but to withdraw. The other difference between ICDR rules of arbitration and ICC rules or UNCITRAL rules is that in the case of ICDR rules, the challenger is required to make an application for the challenge within 15 days while in the case of UNCITRAL rules and ICC rules the challenger is required to make the application within 30 days after notification. On the other hand, the challenge to award is similar in all cases because they allow application for correction of errors to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Bankway Properties Ltd vs. Pensfold-Dunsford, similar question was answered regarding the areas where contractual provisions shall not stand effective where a pretence ‘sham’ has occurred. The court’s decision in Autoclenz’s case stated that the Court of Appeal needs to identify if the parties were bound by any legal obligations, rather than emphasising upon the way a contract was carried out. In overall context, the sham provisions can be treated well through analysing reality of a specific scenario and the underlying legal obligations. Originality of the contractual agreement needs to be proved in such legal cases. It is evident that if the actual version of the employer-employee relationship is different from what is mentioned in the contractual agreement, than employer shall be subjected to legal implications.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the investigator finds that discrimination has occurred both parties will be served with a Letter of Determination. The letter encourages both parties to sit down and resolve the issue in an informal process known as conciliation. But if conciliation does not resolve the issue, then EEOC has the authority to file a lawsuit in a federal court. But if EEOC decides not to litigate, then it is up to the charging party after receiving a Notice of Right to Sue, they have 90 days to file a suit with a federal…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To identify if an individual is an employee, it’ll depend on various aspects such as the amount of control over the individual, an economic reality test and if work is being provided in return for wage. Courts find it problematic in what institutes the classification of an employee, this is due to there being many different employment relationships. (Tort Vicarious Liability, 2013). Act in course of employment is establishing if the employee was impliedly authorised to do something. So this could be a wrongful act authorised by the employer, or the employee may’ve committed the authorised act in an unauthorised way.…

    • 2017 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Longmeadow Homeowners

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If the violation continues for more than 7 days or is corrected but repeated within 15 days, an additional Notice of Violation will be issued to the violating member and a fine will be levied against the member as outlined in Appendix A. 6. The LHA Board of Directors, will, at its sole discretion, remove any…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, employer has to take action when this happened in order to claim the loss. The case Shawton Engineering Ltd v DGP International Ltd (2006) BLR 1 shows what should employer do and the contractor liability. Since it is breach of contract when the contractor delays the completion, the employer can issue notice for the contractor. The notice will not go into effect until the contractor delay the construction work. If the contractor is in breach of contract, the employer can terminate the contract or claim from contractor.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In determining whether to award counsel fees, the court should "review the financial circumstances of both parties together with all other circumstances of the case, which may include the relative merit of the parties ' positions." DeCabrera v. DeCabrera, 70 NY2d 879 (1987); Ciampa v. Ciampa, 47 AD3d 745 (2d Dept. 2008). The court may also consider whether either party has engaged in conduct or taken positions resulting in a delay of the proceedings or unnecessary litigation. See Timpone v. Timpone, 28 AD3d 646 (2d Dept.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case, rescission and restitution are at request. The plaintiff is entitled to remedies when the defendant could foresee what the plaintiff is complaining about. The account of foreseeability is evident here. Both the construction company and Byrd and his partners could have seen tenants leaving, this act was foreseeable. All things considered, buyer's remedies is working based on the facts and judgments of the…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will focus on the article “Terminating the Employee-Employer Relationship: Ethical and Legal Challenges” by D. Van Bogaert and A. Gross-Schaefer. Before going into what the article is explaining, we must understand what the employee-employer relationship is. This is the link between employers and their employees (International Labour Organization, 2017). The International Labour Organization (2017) also explains that with this employment relationship, that special rights and obligations are created between the employee and the employer. The reality of this employment relationship is the condition that decides how labor law requirements will be addressed to employees (International Labour Organization, 2017).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This tool is useful because it can help the defendant petition for a summary judgment. A summary judgment is when the defendant can claim there is no merit to the case, therefore, have the case dismissed. Depositions are oral questions that are directed at the plaintiff or the defendant. Depositions are taken by a court reporter who are usually a notary public. The deponent is under oath to answer the questions truthfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of a client care letter is to provide the client information regarding costs, the firms ' terms of service, details of the person dealing with the matter and any other information which can be referred back to at a later date. This is to ensure that the client has as much information at the start of the matter and it can also be used as evidence in such scenarios where a client is complaining about the solicitor. An example of this would be a providing the client a poor service whether it would be in a professional capacity or lack of information given to the client. The client care letter ensures that all clients are treated fairly in accordance with Principle 5 of the SRA Handbook which states "You must provide a proper standard of service to your clients". X 4.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays