Canellis V. Kalajzich Case Summary

Decent Essays
Part1:

Issue-

In this case, there is an issue surrounding whether Mr. Kalajzich is guilty of murdering his wife Megan Kalajzich on the 27th of May 1998. It had been found that he had intended to murder her and it occurred as he attempted to discharge a loaded gun. There were two appeals made to the Court of Appeal by Mr. Kalajzich, which was an appeal against his conviction, and the other an appeal for special leave. Both appeals were dismissed/refused by the Court. In addition, two appeals made to the Court of Appeal Mr. Kalajzich applied to the Supreme Court under section 474 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) was also refused. Additionally, witnesses have appealed and want publicly funded legal representation as well as Mr. Kalajzich as he believes without it there would be no fair trial because he could not afford it. The common law; however; does not recognize a right of an accused to be funded by public representation.

Rule-
…show more content…
Dietrich was charged with numerous drug offenses and had exhausted all avenues for legal assistance to plea not guilty but eventually, due to all appeals being refused by the Victorian County he was unrepresented in his court trial and raised concerns about the case being an unfair trial. About NSW v Canellis the defendant was convicted of murdering his wife Megan, with intent, attempting to discharge a loaded gun. The defendant’s appeals for special leave were refused as well as an application to the Supreme Court under s474 of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Open Court Essay

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Open Courts Based on the content of the common law, open courts is one of the ways to fulfil open justice. Publicity is an essential indication for open court concept. According to Baylis (1991), one of the most important concepts of justice is ‘justice must to be seen to be done'. Generating accessibility to participate in the court process can improve justice.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Case Of Hugh Rich

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In response to this, he changed his plea from not guilty to guilty. Dietrich was also rejected by the Supreme Court of Victoria. The Country Court Judge followed previous practice and forced Dietrich to go to trial without representation. He was acquitted on two of his charges, however, he was found guilty on the importation charge.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    LEGAL ARGUMENT STANDARD OF APPELLATE REVIEW In reviewing the enforceability of a preliminary injunction an appellate court is not bound by the trial court 's findings of fact, but may weigh the evidence anew and enter its own findings of fact and conclusions of law. Kennedy v. Kennedy, 160 N.C. App. 1, 8, 584 S.E.2d 328, 332 (2003). Thus, if we must consider the facts anew, the court has to determine the enforceability of a preliminary injunction just as how the trial court determines it.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plaintiff Savitri Bhama and defendant Rajendra Bhama were married until they got a divorce in 1977, they both are psychiatrists. While married they had two kids together. After the divorce custody of both kids was given to Savitri. Which led to a custody battle between the defendant and the plaintiff. In 1981, custody of both children was given to the defendant.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts had a vital role in this case as the final outcome would not have been reached if it were not for the court hierarchy. The charge against Eades of “inciting a person under 16 to commit an act of indecency towards him” is a table two indictable offence, meaning that it is to be dealt with summarily (in the Local Court), unless the prosecution nominates that it should be heard in the District Court. The case was first heard in the local court where Eades was acquitted.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This chapter goes into the specifics of pretrial procedures. It discusses the support or refusal of a motion to offer in a plea and sanctions. The first article goes into detail about the responsibilities of a sheriff when detaining a prisoner from another county or when jailing a minor. In article 2 it specifies the proceedings of a commitment hearing, such as, bonds, warrants, the witness’s responsibility to appear in court, the time that is given to be prepared for the case, and hearing the evidence provided in a case. Article 3 sets the instructions for indictments and what that means for officers, children and other specific indictments.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Commigation: A Case Study

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    DEFENDANT’S MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR SENTENCING INVESTIGATION COMES NOW the Defendant, Ulriste Tulin, by counsel, and submits his motion and amended budget proposal for additional authorization for sentencing investigation in this matter pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (“the Act”). In support of such motion, the following is submitted: 1. The defendant was charged with Conspiracy to Commit Hostage Taking, 18 U.S.C. § 1203, two counts of Aiding and Abetting of Hostage Taking, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1203, 2, and Using a Firearm during a Crime of Violence and Aiding and Abetting, 18 U.S.C. § 924.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dietrich v. R (1996): a summary The case of Dietrich v. R asked the High Court to consider: ● whether Australians had the right to a fair trial ● whether an accused person has a right to publicly funded legal representation. Olaf Dietrich was accused of a number of drug-related offences. He was unable to afford legal representation and was made to go to trial without counsel. He felt this went against his rights and appealed his case to the High Court of Australia.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1)a) As the facts demonstrate Enid and Ruth were caught causing criminal damage to property by Sinead and Amijt. Criminal damage is an indictable offence. An assessment will be made using specific sections of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 as to whether the arrests of Enid and Ruth were lawful.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of R V Askov

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In past 30 years Canadian courts are struggling with the Charter’s emphasis under section 11(b) that “any person charged with an offence has the right to be tried within a reasonable time”. There has been still not any clarity what is “reasonable time” despite courts has described some factors to determine it. The most important case with reference to reasonableness was R v Askov (1990), where the Supreme Court held (9-0) that accused rights have been violated under section 11 (b) of the Charter. It took 34 months in bringing charges to the trial court; as a result of this charges against the accused were stayed. Courts made it very clear that due to lack of resources, they would not tolerate delays.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Krouse v. Graham 19 Cal.3d 59, 562 P.2d 1022, 137 Cal. Rptr. 863 Facts: The Krouse family was returning from a grocery shopping trip and their car was parked on the curb. When Elizabeth (the wife) and Vinka Mladinov (neighbor) were returning to shut the door of the car, Graham hits a curb and rear ends the parked car. This results in the hitting the neighbor (Mladinov) and Elizabeth (the mother).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    FINAL JOURNAL ENTRY LAW IN SOCIETY I have learnt that the law is multifaceted, unpredictable, and its technical nature can lead to outcomes that we, as society, may initially perceive as perverse. I refer to the main pillar of criminal defence is legal guilt versus factual guilt. That is to say, a person may have committed the crime, but will be found not guilty if the state cannot prove it beyond reasonable doubt. The balance hangs, then, in whether defence counsel can demonstrate failures or omissions on behalf of the state, in regards to improper or poor police work, illegal seizures of evidence, and any other failures of proper procedure.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    R V Gadsby Case Study

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This involves the wide range of legislation. In this context, the present report is prepared to analyze the criminal evidence in the given case study of R v Gadsby [2005] EWCA Crim 3206. Here in the report list of relevant key facts and evidence is constructed and the extra information regarding the case scenario from the media is…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The laws of the justice system are the backbone that give it form and unity. The victims of crime existed unrecognized in the justice system. Victims had few roles when it came to the justice system. The passing of the first crime victim’s state bill of rights in Wisconsin in 1980 gave way to a new era of improvement for victim’s rights. The enactment of federal acts and task force in 1982 brought national importance to the victim’s concerns.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following case was originally dealt with by a deciding officer, and then the appellant appealed to the Chief Appeals Officer, the decision of the Chief Appeals Officer was appealed in the High Court, but was later dismissed by the Supreme Court. The case was in relation to an area of employment law, which concerns itself with the contract of an employee. The question in hand was whether the demonstrator, Sandra Mahon was employed under a contract of service or rather a contract for service, therefore identifying whether she was an “insurable person”. Sandra Mahon (“The demonstrator”) applied to work for the company (appellant) in 1988 as a demonstrator. The nature of this role was that when the shop required a showcase of a product,…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics