Open Court Essay

Improved Essays
Open Courts
Based on the content of the common law, open courts is one of the ways to fulfil open justice. Publicity is an essential indication for open court concept. According to Baylis (1991), one of the most important concepts of justice is ‘justice must to be seen to be done'. Generating accessibility to participate in the court process can improve justice. Open court with public hearing is to ensure the enforcement of integrity within the law, the honesty of the evidence, and the information conveying to the public. (The principle of open justice)Publicity of courts trials can also lead to the trust and accountability of public. Rinehart v Welker [2011] NSWCA 403 at [32] (Bathurst CJ and McColl JA), citing Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 (at 463)

Why are some courts closed to the public, that is, held in camera?
Some courts hearing proceedings closed to the public are based on the reason of privacy and protection the interest of the parties, especially the vulnerable witness and victims. For example, the hearings of sex offences in which participants are children or teenagers less than eighteen years old are held in camera. Besides, with another case such as marriage annulment which is concerning sexual abuse, the proceedings are also held in camera. Furthermore, there are cases such as terrorism and child pornography are also
…show more content…
The public can implement their civil rights by hearing in the court. It is people that grant the government the power to fulfil the justice. If the public can not see the proceeding, people cannot know what is happening during the trials. That is, the suspicion may rise out of the public and people may not trust jurisdiction anymore. As the saying goes, ‘Justice must to be seen to be done'. Therefore, it is about the social contract between people and the government and people have the rights to participate in the court

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Democratic societies like Canada and the United States follow the unwritten and underlying principle of “rule of law”. The rule of law ensure that a certain level of procedural justice are achieved in trials, as they provide the court with a basic grid of evaluation. However, such procedural processes were not respected in the Bryant-Milam trial, as the the two social categories of race and social class tarnished the processes of the trial, fostering impartial judicial proceedings and ultimately disallowing justice. The trials ability in achieving justice was deterred as occupational status and race contaminated and fostered impartiality amongst the jury, the witnesses and the provided evidence; three of the fundamental components of a judicial proceedings.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis: The Jury System

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Why is this important now? What impact will it have on the future? - The proceeding issue deals with whether or not to abolish the peremptory challenges within the judicial system. Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without the inclusion of a reason as to why.…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common law is the development of systems and rules to articulate a decision based on precedent, tradition and customs. History has developed, through these techniques, to create an ideology that results in a massive grey area within the words. Laws have and will always be words on a piece of paper, the customs of the laws are unique. These customs, precedents, and traditions have created institutional inequality built into the architecture of law. This relationship is presented by Galanter, Derrick Bell, and Austin Sarat.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    General Difference Between Successful and Unsuccessful Mental Disorder Defense Despite many characteristics mentioned in the above, the fact that most individuals found NCRMD have had previous contact with the psychiatric system or history records with the criminal justice system are very interesting to acknowledge. When compared with individuals with successful the NCRMD defense and unsuccessful NCRMD defense, individuals with NCRMD found more involvement with the psychiatric previously(Gullets, 2016). It suggests that the offenders who have been diagnosed with a mental disorder in the past have more possibility of successful NCRMD defense compared to others with no previous records with the psychiatrist. In another words, the previous records…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the movie M, the criminals themselves captured the culprit for the murder of the children and they are holding a “criminal’s court” or “Kangaroo Court.” In this trial, the audience can see no matter what the circumstances are procedures and trials are important. Despite that these people are criminals; they are still holding a trial to convict the murderer and to punish him for the crimes that he committed. However, they did not employ the full extent of the law (procedures). Criminal law is a system of law that has to do with punishing those who commit crimes.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Adult Court Case Essay

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. How does waiver to adult court occur? What is the main reason to waive a juvenile to adult court? - Waiver to adult court occurs by according to Taylor R.& Fritsch E. (2011 P. 12), “certification, or transfer, and involves a juvenile court’s relinquishing its jurisdiction over the offender and allowing a juvenile to be sent to adult court for prosecution.” The main reason to waive a juvenile to adult court is if he or she commits a delinquent crime that would have been a crime if committed by an adult and if the prosecutor chooses not to file a petition the prosecutor them has the option to waive the juvenile to criminal justice system for prosecution.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This begs the question Mass media has an appetite for heinous and abnormal crimes, resulting in extensive notoriety in criminal cases, which in turn affects the proceedings of criminal court. To begin with, criminal proceedings are normally initiated…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An out of court disposal is a way of dealing with a criminal offence, through methods which do not require a prosecution in court. Their use is often for low level, first time offences. There are a wide range of out of court disposals, they include (although are not limited to) the cannabis warning, simple caution, youth caution, conditional cautions, conditional discharge and penalty notices for disorder. For an out of court disposal to be given, the offender must admit their guilt and there should be enough evidence to prove that the individual committed the offence. It is also necessary to consider whether the public interest would be served by the using of such disposal.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Gerald Rosenberg, in his analysis on whether courts are powerful agents in achieving social change, highlights two main court views: The Dynamic Court view and the Constrained Court view. The Dynamic Court view holds that courts are successful agents in producing social change, while the constrained court view argues for the opposite (Rosenberg, 2). The American civil rights movement was an important demonstration in Rosenberg’s argument of the Constrained Court view (Rosenberg, 9). The Constrained court view maintains that courts cannot produce social change. In my response, I will deconstruct his court views to understand whether courts can produce significant social reform.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens do not elect judges, make or interpret laws; however they have a very important role in the shape of the justice system. People play an indirect role in forming the justice system by electing members of legislature and executive branches who can check on the Judiciary. Hence, the people also have a huge impact on the Judiciary just like the other…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trial Summery Over the summer and fall of 2015 I Interned at the public defender’s office in Wake County. Throughout my time interning I have been working on two cases, neither of which have gone to trial neither of which have gone to trial at this stage. However, I was able to attend part of a trial for a rape case, in which our client was the defendant. By attending part of this case, I was able to experience first-hand courtroom procedures.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Courtroom Reflection Paper

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Learning about the legal environment in the classroom setting can be very interesting and exciting, but seeing a court in action is an entirely new learning experience. During my time spent at the Superior Court of Tolland at Rockville, I had the opportunity to observe multiple components of various court cases. Three cases that specifically stuck out to me were a criminal arraignment, jury selection, and a landlord/tenant dispute. Each of these cases had different elements that allowed me to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the United States legal system. The first case I witnessed was a domestic violence arraignment.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays