Commigation: A Case Study

Improved Essays
DEFENDANT’S MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR SENTENCING INVESTIGATION

COMES NOW the Defendant, Ulriste Tulin, by counsel, and submits his motion and amended budget proposal for additional authorization for sentencing investigation in this matter pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (“the Act”). In support of such motion, the following is submitted:
1. The defendant was charged with Conspiracy to Commit Hostage Taking, 18 U.S.C. § 1203, two counts of Aiding and Abetting of Hostage Taking, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1203, 2, and Using a Firearm during a Crime of Violence and Aiding and Abetting, 18 U.S.C. § 924.
2. The defendant was found guilty by a jury and is pending sentencing, where he faces a life sentence.
3. To
…show more content…
Investigator/mitigation (to be determined) - $125 (if Court transfers previously authorized funds) or in the alternative 25 hours at $100/hour for a total of $2500
10. The projected costs/fee are counsel’s best good faith estimates based counsel’s experience and counsel’s consultation with the service providers and the Circuit Case Budgeting Attorney.
11. Counsel has endeavored to keep costs down whenever possible, taking into account their ethical obligations to provide adequate representation and of budgetary constraints under the Criminal Justice Act.
12. Counsel respectfully requests that the Court allows authorize the additional funds for sentencing investigation.
13. If the Court requires additional information or clarification, counsel is ready to respond to any inquiries.
14. The trial and sentencing strategies of the defendant’s counsel are privileged, and therefore, this request is made ex parte.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Ulriste Tulin, through counsel, respectfully requests that Honorable Court approve the additional authorization for sentencing investigation in this matter pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (“the Act”) and grant leave to proposed necessary amendments should they become necessary by a change in circumstances as this matter

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lindbergh Baby Case Study

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the appeals and resentencing phase of the Hauptmann trial, another component of the criminal justice system is seen, that is…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the judgement of Mason CJ and McHugh J, it was said that a “ trial judge who is faced with an application for an adjournment or a stay by an indigent accused charged with a serious offence [...] the trial in such a case should be adjourned, postponed or stayed until legal representation is available. The judgement also stated that “an accused has the right to a fair trial and that, depending on all the circumstances of the particular case, lack of representation may mean that an accused is unable to receive, or did not receive, a fair trial. “ Moreover, the judgement of Deane and Gaudron suggested that the right to receive counsel was found in the Constitution, specifically Chapter Three which requires that ‘judicial process and fairness be observed.’ However, both Justice Brennan and Justice Dawson dissented, stating that it would unjust for judges to adjourn or stay trial due to the pressures it would place on legal aid agencies. For Dietrich, the outcome of the High Court case meant that without the legal representation he had required for the trial and due to the trial judge’s failure to grant an adjournment, a miscarriage of justice had occurred.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Review: In 1975, Attorney General, Avrum Gross, declared a prohibition on plea-bargaining in Alaska. Michael Rubinstein and Teresa J. White from National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice were assigned to study the impact of Gross’s decision. Their first task was looking at whether the policy had been carried out by the courts in Alaska, and second, was what the effects were on Alaska’s criminal justice system. This involved conducting 400 interviews of the surrounding judges in Alaska and collecting information from 3,586 case files. Overall their goal was to create a detailed description of the Alaska system during the “before and after” years.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plaintiff’s counsel has requested that the Department transfer Cohen, as far away from the Cumberland region as possible, to another institution within his classification level or ICC him. Before settlement exploration may proceed further, Cohen’s counsel has requested a transfer decision. As rationale, he explained that non-monetary considerations are Cohen’s primary concern due to his life sentence and lack of family. He also advised that a significant monetary award will not be a primary consideration unless the negotiation of the non-monetary terms are unsuccessful. He is adamant that Cohen does not wish to undertake discussion of any other terms until the Department determines whether transfer of Cohen is an…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alian Boudrias Case

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first charge consisted of failure to comply with the court’s conditions. The court established the accused, Boudrias, had to remain in an address provided by the Ottawa Freedom Centre (OFC) and was instructed to not move outside of the perimeter without the given consent of the court or without the company of an OFC’s…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name of case: Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Greater Oregon Court: United States Supreme Justice rendered the final decision in the case. Citation: The citation given to the case was 515 U.S. 687 (1995) Parties and their roles: (the plaintiff) consisted of Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Greater Oregon along with several lawn-care owners. These plaintiffs pursued criminal charges due to the Secretary of the Interior and Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS) about the definition term of taking and harm, regarding the Endangered Species Act (ESA).…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The respondent, Gerald Scarpelli, a felony probationer was arrested after committing a burglary. The respondent's probation was revoked without a hearing and he was not represented by counsel. He filed a petition for habeas corpus and the District Court concluded that revocation of probation without a hearing and without counsel was a denial of due process. The Court of Appeals affirmed.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion Ms. Justice Martinez delivers the opinion of the court. Appellant stands convicted of murdering Mr. Thompkins and possession of an illegal firearm. The Supreme Court of New Jersey found the conviction valid based primarily upon the confession unlawfully obtained from the appellant and the evidence brought to the court which was also unlawfully collected at the victim’s home. On December 24, the Ocean County Sherriff’s department was called to a wellness check of Mr. Thompkins.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the Crime Control Model, as Packer described it, defense counsel was considered a luxury, or worse, an impediment to efficient processing of the guilty. By contrast, under the Due Process Model, as we have seen, defense counsel was the key to asserting and protecting the defendant‘s rights” (Keith p.43). The techniques of extending…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    III. THE COURT IMPROPERLY PRECLUDED MR. TULIN’S COUNSEL FROM COMMENTING ON THE COURTROOM DEMEANOR OF MS. MARCELIN, IN VIOLATION OF MR. TULIN’S RIGHTS UNDER THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE Ms. Marcelin, while exiting the witness stand, but still in the courtroom and within plain sight of the jury, purposefully waved and smiled at Mr. Tulin.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brandon Betterman, the petitioner in this case, pleads guilty to jumping bail after not appearing for his court date on charges of domestic assault. Between his conviction and his sentencing, Betterman waited fourteen months due to a delay within the institution (Betterman). He believes that fourteen months should be taken off of his sentencing. This began the ultimate constitutional debate concerning what he considered his right to a speedy trial. The ruling claimed by the Montana Supreme Court stated the Sixth Amendment’s Speedy Trial Clause does not apply to the post conviction and pre-sentencing delay (Betterman).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Heffernan faced a few moral dilemmas when he was working as assistant to the District Attorney. One in particular was when he was faced with a moral challenge in the case of a defendant Heffernan presumed to be guilty, but had been denied a fair trial by jury. Heffernan was confronted with the decision of whether or not to challenge an appeal made by the defense so the defendant could have a fair trial by jury. But with a new trial, the defendant stood a chance of winning his trial since the previous witnesses were out of the country. Then a presumed murderer would be free on the streets.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, I spent my day observing juvenile detention hearings and a drug court trial in Mercer County, New Jersey. For my first observation, I went to Mercer Family Division in Mercer County, New Jersey. I observed several juvenile detention hearings. I asked one of my previous supervisors if I could sit in with her during her time in court. Overall the process for each child went relatively briefly.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Serena Pang Professor Karl A. Boedecker BUS 301 April 6, 2017 I. Court(s) visited: San Francisco Criminal Divisions of the Superior Court, which is located in 850 Bryant Street, San Francisco. II. Day(s) and Time(s) Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. III. Judge: I could not hear the name of the Judge.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays