Theoretical Discussion On Administrative Ethics Essay

1211 Words Nov 17th, 2015 null Page
This reflection paper reflect some theoretical discussion about administrative ethics, and how it is apply in practical and real-world bureaucratic discretion and formal rules. It also elaborate more on the challenges facing public administrators through administrative evil and ways that administrators can used to combat corruption, with various self-correcting mechanism for shady tactics particularly on whistleblowing.
Holzer and Schwester (2011, p.350) described ethics to be grounded in teleological and deontological theories. Teleological theories suggest that the consequences of any action is a critical factor to consider before making any decision or take any action, whereas deontological theories focus on the motives and the intention of any action as a critical factor rather than on consequences. Adams and Balfour (2009), writes that deontological ethics are meant to safeguard the integrity of the organization by abide to the professional norms, avoid mistakes and misdeeds that violates public trust, and ensure public officials are accountable to the people (p.598). While French and Granrose (1995) define ethics as a set of guidelines that can be used to resolve conflict of interest and improve societal well-being, Thompson (1985) provides a better definition of administrative ethics as the rights and duties that individuals should respect when take any action that may affect the well-being of other people and society. It also emphasize on satisfying the conditions of…

Related Documents