The Pros And Cons Of Cracking

Improved Essays
With redistricting, gerrymandering, cracking, and stacking, how can we choose our representatives? When clearly, they choose us, even before we vote.
Redistricting is the process of redrawing electoral districts boundaries, often in response to population changes during census. Every state has its own standard of redistricting that complies with federal requirements to equalize the population, but it creates gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the deliberate manipulation of political boundaries for electoral advantage or it creates safe seats, which creates predetermination in elections before voting. This would make our process undemocratic. Cracking is when the minority community is fragmented into several districts, none of which have
…show more content…
The two basic ways to achieve this is the party list system and the multi-member district system. With the party list system the parties each list their candidates according to that party 's determination of priorities. In closed list systems, voters vote for a list of candidates, with the party choosing the order of candidates on the list. Each party is allocated seats in proportion to the number of votes it receives, using the party-determined ranking order. In open list the voters may vote, depending on the model, for one person, or for two, or indicate their order of preference within the list. The number of candidates elected is determined by the number of votes the list receives for that party. The percent of the vote for a party equals the percent of the seats that the party wins. This also allows third party candidates to win. This helps to ensure that the will of the people be …show more content…
He introduced Proposition 11 to the voters who enacted it in 2008. This put the redistricting into the hands of the citizens redistricting committee. Under this Act, government auditors would select sixty registered voters from an applicant pool. Legislative leaders are permitted to reduce the pool. The auditors then pick eight commission member by lottery and those commissioner then pick six more members. The commission is to include five member of the largest political party, five members from the second largest party, and four members that do not belong to either party. In order for redistricting plans to be implemented three members from each group must approve the plan. This did not include congressional districts. The governor did not stop there. Proposition 20, passed in 2010, gave the congressional districts to the citizens redistricting committee (Wikipedia). The 120 legislative districts and the 53 congressional districts will be drawn by the California Citizens Redistricting Commission. There will continue to be fourteen members of the commission. They still did not stop there. California has, also, changed their primary elections to break the parties control in two ways. The state had an independent commission (instead of state legislature) to draw congressional and state legislative districts. This redistricting increased the number of competitive seats between the two

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Baker V. Carr Case Study

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Each political gathering has an individual national tradition. Agents from each state go to the conve Some state parties require that representatives vote in an indistinguishable way from the result of the essential or council; be that as it may, not all state parties have this necessity. Commonly, the individuals from a gathering as of now vote in favor of the presidential candidate amid the essential season, and the vote at the national tradition is a stylized, however official, stamp for the champ. On the off chance that there is an uncommon tie amid the essential decision, the representatives at the tradition pick the chosen people by a particular arrangement of standards for each gathering.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most people believe that the outcome of elections in Texas is decided by the voters, but in our current single-member district system of electing representatives, frequently that is not the case. Often times who will win in an election is decided long before election day, usually by those who draw the district lines. For example, if the districts in texas are drawn to be 65 percent republican then the outcome will most likely result in republicans that have the majority of seats in the legislature. In a single member district system, only one member can be elected to congress for each district, that is why drawing the district lines is by far one of the most important aspects for a party to win seats. The parties assure their representatives…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judge Justice (along with the other judges) found that The Legislative Redistricting Board did not take redistricting seriously, but instead they did what they wanted. Another issue that was brought up in the case was the multimember districts in Dallas and Bexar. Representatives in these districts are elected but minorities seem to be underrepresented. The Legislative Redistricting Board had the lines drawn so there could be political success. The decision that was made brought controversy so this case was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court (White v. Regester) in which they agreed with the court’s decision.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People don't get a choice about who they want representing them as a country, which is the whole opposite of what being a democratic country means. Their voting for a reason and should be able to have a say in what's going on in the government. But sometimes when politicians are drawing these borders their not always looking out for the people and sometimes only care about their own political interest. For example, if they're more on the Republican side then their more lenient to drawing the district borders in a way that will benefit the Republican party. Which doesn't respect the wishes and desires of the voters, and allowing this to happen is not what democracy is about.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to playing the gerrymandering game, I knew that it was the manipulation of districts in order to gain a political advantage of some kind. It is possible to do this because the districts have to be redrawn based on updated census data, as population is always changing. I also knew that it is difficult for the opposing party to win an election when the controlling party gerrymandered the district to favor them. While playing the game, I learned that it is difficult to adjust the districts where every representative is satisfied. I also learned that if there were more strict laws about having very thin parts of the district, it would be more difficult to gerrymander.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This compromise came out of two separate plans drafted by Virginia and New Jersey. The Virginia plan outlined a representation system for government based on population, meaning that the higher the population of the state, the more representatives it deserved. This plan would cause an overwhelming under-representation of smaller states like New Jersey, which responded by issuing the New Jersey plan in which all states received equal representation. These two extremes were compromised in the work of Roger Sherman, who drafted a plan for a bi-caramel legislature in which one houses representation was based on population while the other provided each state with equal representation. Today, these two houses of government are known as the House of Representatives, based on population, and the Senate, where each state receives two…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congressional reapportionment and redistricting are conducted every ten years. When redistricting is conducted politicians often engage in gerrymandering. Define congressional reapportionment and explain one reason why it is important to states. Congressional reapportionment is when there is a change in the amount of seats in the House of Representatives after the United States Census, or decennial census.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an interview on gerrymandering, Lance Kelley noted that it is a case of “out of sight, out of mind” (“Kelley”). People seem to forget that gerrymandering is a problem until they are outraged by the unfairness of it. Unfortunately, at that point the districts have been drawn and confirmed, and it is generally too late to change them. After a gerrymander has been finalized, it is difficult to change it prior to the next redistricting. Occasionally lawsuits have been filed against excessive gerrymanders, stating that they are unconstitutional.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The result of this gerrymandering was an overrepresented Democratic party, inaccurately reflecting the views of our state’s citizens. It’s important to acknowledge that our court’s ruling on this issue has larger implications in the battle against gerrymandering as a whole. Gill v. Whitford 16 U.S. 1161 (2017-18) is another recent case that illustrates why gerrymandering is such a pressing question in our republic. The Republican state legislature in Wisconsin created unfair districts to ensure their majority in 2011. This redistricting resulted in the Wisconsin Republicans obtaining over sixty percent of…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Dilemma Premise: The U.S. Electoral College voting system needs to be improved upon because whoever earns the majority of total votes cast should be the winner. Definitions: Electoral College-…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main subject of the article is the controversy over the state’s redistricting plan and racial discrimination. Citizens and civil rights groups have started to challenge the discrimination in Texas elections. Texas is facing lawsuits over racial and political redistricting. The U.S. Supreme Court has also started to take action and implement laws to create change. The Voting Rights Act was created to prevent legal restrictions against minority redistricting.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When states need to redraw districts after every census, it is often up to state legislatures to figure out the lines. Within limits, the state legislatures can draw the districts however they see fit. The basic requirements from the federal government are equal populations in each congressional district, and compliance with the 1982 Voting Rights Amendment. The Voting Right Amendment prohibited both discriminatory intents and effects when drawing district lines, and allowed for the creation of majority-minority districts as a method of remedying discriminatory effects. Most other considerations – such as a desire to make districts geographically compact – are based on state laws.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays