Drehle's Argument Against Capital Punishment

Superior Essays
Capital Punishment
2,943 prisoners are currently on death row. Of those, only 60 are in a federal prison for infamous acts of murder. Capital punishment, or more commonly known as the death penalty/sentence, is a government type of punishment for committing capital crimes. Currently, the number of people on death row is high and is continuing to rise. Attorneys state that capital punishment is not justified for humans, even though it is. Capital punishment is a better choice than receiving a life sentence in prison.
Although the death penalty can be looked at as a gruesome act, it’s simply an experiment that has been proven successful. While those opposed might say that it’s an experiment that never should’ve happened, that is not so. The courts are stating that if criminals are convicted of life, they will learn their lesson, but this isn’t always the case. According to David Von Drehle from Time magazine, in 2015, a guy known as Thomas Knight was executed after being on death row for almost 40 years. He was sentenced to death row in 1975 after he kidnapped, robbed, and murdered a couple in Miami Beach. He stabbed a guard to death with a shank- which is any type of item that can be sharpened to a point- five years later, while he was still in prison (Drehle). This is the death penalty at its
…show more content…
Those who oppose will argue with saying how executions harm those being executed. “Torture is defined as an act where pain and suffering is inflicted upon a person, whether it be mental or physical (White Paper).” So unless that person is being harmed on purpose and is suffering, they are not being tortured. While there have been some cases where criminals like Thomas Knight are being harmed and are in pain, that rarely happens. Capital Punishment should not have pain and suffering coming from their executions, even though sometimes it accidentally happens. Even though there are good sides to capital punishment, it can also have a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While the justice system tries its best to find the right people who committed a crime, it is made up of humans who can and will make mistakes. Because of this, people who are actually innocent can be determined guilty. If they are sentenced to the death penalty (and the state goes through with it) and new evidence (or even old evidence) shows that they are actually innocent, they cannot bring that person back to life. If they are sentenced to life in prison, however, and they are found to be not guilty, they are able to be released from prison. It is not an ideal situation but it is better than dying for a crime that a person did not commit.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They seem to believe in an eye for an eye justice. However, in my opinion, killing people can never be a humane act. Besides this, it is not always certain that all the convicted criminals are actually guilty. Some innocent people might get executed for the crimes they never did due to lack of proper evidences. If life imprisonment is practiced instead of the death penalty, such innocent people can be freed whenever their innocence is…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people see it as an eye for an eye type of ordeal, while others see it as legal murder. According to Steven Goldberg (1974), “one who supports capital punishment can foreclose further discussion by asserting that an eye must be taken for an eye, even if the taking of an eye does not deter anyone any more than would a lesser penalty.” Some people believe that having the death penalty creates a safer environment. Edwin R. Keedy (1912) believes that having the death penalty in places prevents some of these awful criminals from taking their bad behavior even further and taking someone’s life. According to Roger Hood (2016), the death penalty is not any more of a deterrent than life…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over time, punishment has changed, and society’s views have as well. Capital punishment has been a largely debatable subject over the past decades, but the government still chooses to keep this punishment. Although the death penalty should be viewed as a good way to keep murderers behind bars, this punishment can send an innocent person to death row for a crime they did not commit, and in cases, there are problems of people being subjective, such as having discrimination. Capital punishment is a place for justice. People say this punishment is for those who have created barbaric crimes.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An objection that Haag uses is that the right to life is forfeited if the crime that is broken is severe enough. While the counter argument to this is that some rights should be taken, but to kill another human being is not the only form of punishment. Once a life is taken, it cannot be returned, it’s a dark road that has no return. Some state that imprisonment does nothing to deter the next crime of committing that same crime. So sense the argument finds that life imprisonment seem to be a sensible punishment.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various argument against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny. Instead, Jeffrey H. Reimn conveys the notion of any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty today is perceived by many as an inhumane way of receiving punishment. A critic will not only argue the simple fact that the death penalty is a violation of one’s constitutional rights and only targeted for a particular social group, but also intended to affect innocent people. The death penalty doesn’t have to be the way it’s perceived to be today, for if it is dealt with accordingly, the benefits will outweigh the negative and would help the United States in the foreseeing future. That being said, instead of worrying about the damage the death penalty may cause, one should take into consideration the reasoning behind maintaining and implementing new procedures that would further enforce the penalty nationwide. Convicts…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sometimes the law takes its way of life and it can be biased as well as it may be too prejudiced. Although Civil Right movement has campaigned against capital punishment. The statement against capital punishment is that, even though it is a penalization for the murders, it will not hurt to punish the murders with the less harsh sentence. Capital punishment would have been justifiable if it were able to prevent future offenses. Yet, this has not been the case so…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment cannot be an effective deterrent when it’s enforced haphazardly across the country. The Death Penalty Information Center has found that execution is irregularly sentenced upon defendants, depending on the county of jurisdiction. An expansive report showed that just two percent of counties in America accounted for 52 percent of executions and 56 percent of death row inmates. Most of these counties have infamous records of corruption and misconduct. For example Maricopa County in Arizona had four times the number of pending death penalty cases than Los Angeles due to the aggressive actions of the district attorney who was disbarred for misconduct.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is not a decision to be taken lightly, but in some instances it is the right decision to be made. People have such a hard time thinking that anybody deserves this end of the line punishment, but they need to understand there needs to be a way to help prevent people from thinking that all that can happen is they end up in prison. That sort of mindset is detrimental to a society, letting people think that they can commit haynes crimes and only go to prison. There is a misconception that we should not give people the death penalty in case that person is innocent, but the people who receive the death penalty are proven to have committed the crimes that they are charged with before receiving capital punishment. Capital punishment…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays