Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Essay

Improved Essays
Imagine a world where no one was punished for their crimes. An innocent family could have been driving around with their young son, and in one instant they all lay dead in the car. Since no one is punished for crimes, the perpetrator goes free. This means no closure for the victims’ family. They must go through life hating the fact that their family members are gone. Why would society allow this to happen? The cost of murder should be paid by the life of the person responsible. Capital punishment is the legal authorized killing of a person for a crime. All over the world, people commit crimes every day, and everyday people have to face the consequences of those crimes. Certain offenses that warrant the death penalty are: treason, pre-meditated murder, and criminal homicide (Death Penalty Info Center). When one of these offenses is committed, the person however is not executed soon. A person condemned to death is the put on death row for around 15 years. Baze v. Rees was a landmark case in the protection of capital punishment. In this case, two Kentucky inmates on death row; both are sentenced to death for murder. Ralph Baze and Thomas Bowling claimed that the lethal injection procedure that the state uses creates …show more content…
Many states that allow lethal injection normally use three drugs, The three-drug protocol uses an anesthetic or sedative, typically followed by pancuronium bromide to paralyze the inmate and potassium chloride to stop the prisoner 's heart. The sedative drug varies by state. This combination of drugs, however, is thought to be unethical in many court cases even though it is the “default” method in many states. States that allow lethal injection include: Missouri, Georgia, Indiana, and before the death penalty was abolished- Maryland (Death Penalty Info

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Court Case Review Throughout the years the United States government has been faced with several discussions. Some of these have become very important throughout history and have left a significate impact on society. These cases range from birth control privacy rights to equality. Among these cases are Griswold V. Connecticut, Baze V. Rees, and Brown V. Board of Education.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. The death penalty is a complex issue, and can understandably be argued from both sides, those opposing the death penalty, and those who feel capital punishment should still be an option. Capital punishment should be abolished because, people are capable of change, the penalty puts innocent lives at risk, and we pay millions for each death penalty case. Firstly, people are capable of change; in other words, the guilty adept to rehabilitation.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In most states, the imposition of the death penalty on certain; mostly murderous crimes is established in the perceptions of the cost of such crimes to the victims’ families and the social cost to the society. There even appears to be an economic inclination saliently factored into the justice of capital punishment by comparing the value of imprisonment cost as opposed to the cost of incarceration. There appears to be an automatic or reflexive behavior for a retributive justice towards violent crimes involving murder of a loved one. Even the most ardent opponents to the death penalty as in my case, I succumb to the default psychological judgment of wanting justice at all cost. The problem for me arises when there is not an absolute evidence of facts that links an accused person to such crimes, and even if there was one, the facts in this case can be subjective.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lethal Injection Capital punishment has been a heated debate for a long time. Capital punishment is a system where prisoners who committed grave crimes that usually involve either mass murder or rape are sentenced to die to either give retribution for the heinous act committed and to deter other criminals from doing the same or similar crimes against humanity. This can be carried out from a variety of ways but, the only common one that is used currently is lethal injection. The lethal injection is a three step process that results in the death of the criminal being executed. The first drug causes the victim to fall unconscious after the drug reaches the brain in 30 seconds.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the Death Penalty Stay? Death is certainly the ultimate punishment. The death penalty needs to be implemented in our society because it is the most terminal punishment for the most horrific crimes. A few years back, i was coming home from school. It had been a great day, just as they normally had been that school year.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the twenty first century there has been a considerable amount of discussion debating whether or not the death penalty, the act of sentencing someone to death as punishment for a crime, should be re-introduced into Australia’s modern society. In these disputes people attempt to argue that the death penalty should be brought back as it is a deterrent against crime, however evidence proves that the death penalty should not be reintroduced into Australias society as it is cruel and inhumane Such evidence is outlined in the history of the death penalty, in the rise of executions of our neighbouring countries which still up hold the death penalty and even in the many cases where people have had the human rights violated and have been falsely accused…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first death penalty law was adopted around the Eighteenth Century B.C.E. The law was put in place by King Hammurabi of Babylon. Capital punishment came to America during the European colonization in the Seventeenth Century. Since then, the United States was formed. Originally, every state used capital punishment up until 1846 when Michigan banned capital punishment for all crimes except treason.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Almost 40 years ago, death penalty was abolished in Australia. Today, there has been a lot of debate as to reintroducing the capital punishment for severe crimes in Australia. Some would agree to give death penalty for major crimes and some would say life time imprisonment would be a better option. Criminals feel empowered when crime is punished lightly and crime proliferates. So, death penalty is a possible solution to lower down the crime rates and to give proper punishment for serious crimes in Australia.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate with the motion “Abolish the Death Penalty”, Diann Rust-Tierney argues that the death penalty is an insecure and hurtful policy that does not help advance public safety. Diann claims that the death penalty is not giving the public any safety nor does it decrease violence. Arguing that it is a waste of taxpayer money that could be used to improve law enforcement training. She later argues that the death penalty is an outdated system that is bias towards race and color, claiming that black men are less likely to be sentenced to death even though they are most likely to be victims of homicide. Diann ends her argument with a humanitarian statement that we as humans have the ability to change our way of life and we should not have to take…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death is permanent, which creates a large issue out of capital punishment. Taking a life is wrong, hence the severe punishment instated. However, the penalty is the same as the crime. Two wrongs don’t make a right. A poor example is set by killing in response to killing, and the crime is perpetuated.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is described as a government sanctioned punishment where a person that has committed a crime is put to death by the state. This sentence is commonly used toward people who have committed awfully high offenses such as murder, war crimes, and crimes against humanity and genocides. It dates back to the 1500's where this was seen as the just way of law that made criminals pay for their crimes in front of an entire community. Back then they used methods of hanging, stoning, and lashing these people, their main purpose being one, to maximize the general balance of pain and pleasure towards society. There are certain actions that we can take into our hands and those in which the law plays an important role.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the topic of the Death Penalty you have to ask yourself the morality of what you are doing, and if other human beings should have the right to take the life of someone else for what you deem as wrong above and beyond the normal crime. From an economic standpoint you realize that it is extremely inefficient not only in terms of time, but in the sheer amount of money it takes for the death penalty to actually be handed down making it more economically inefficient. I. Monetary Cost a. Texas i. Being the state with the largest amount of executions I deemed it fitting to be seen as a key component of defining how much it really costs to actually have the death penalty take place. ii.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As statistics, have shown, it does cost an obscene amount of money to execute a person, however it can help save innocent lives, and there isn’t a price that can be put on that. In closing, if someone has committed a heinous crime and is given the death penalty it should be required for them to see it through. As mentioned earlier, this will allow the family to have closure and potentially deter future offenders. Capital punishment very well could solve more problems than originally…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianna Coffee Dr. Huck GSTR 110 Capital Punishment The death penalty should never be applied as a punishment to a person convicted of intentionally killing another person because the death penalty is a costly, unfair punishment that does not benefit society as a whole. What is the death penalty? The death penalty is defined as “the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime.” (Definition of Death Penalty in English) Since 1976 there have been over fourteen hundred executions in the United States.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays