The Importance Of Killing Animals

Good Essays
In contrast, killing animals is not valid because it is cruel thing to do. First, some country kills many animals for ceremony by cruel ways. For example, they cut animals’ head while they still alive. They stabbed animals with no mercy. It is uncivilized festival. As Pickover says “the cruel traditions should not be admiration and respect because it is not a good culture” (Berger, S, 2009).
So, killing animals that brutal and inhuman is not an appropriate thing to do. In the ceremony, we must do the good thing such as prayer for god and ourselves. Killing someone on that day is not a good idea anymore. Why can we kill them like we are devil? We should not think that animals do not pain.
Animals have their mind like human. Nowadays, many
…show more content…
They just think that animals can find the new home in shelter. There are many ways that do not end in this way. Singer founds that “Killing a merely sentient creature (with a pleasant future) is wrong because it robs the animal of the pleasant future it would otherwise have” (Kagan, S, 2015)
It can be seen that we do not know that this animal may find a new lovely family and house in the future. If we kill them now, it is a wrong decision for them.
However, killing animal for sport is not acceptable. Why can human kill animals for fun or hobby on the suffering of animals? It is an act of cruelty. For instance, many hunters have so much fun to kill the wildlife by using powerful weapons and always take a photograph with the pitiful body such as elephant, tiger, or lion. Mitra explains that “Hunters kill the poor animals, not for food or anything else but for selling them as trophies” (2012). It means human only think of the honor. We do not care anything. We show people that we can kill them for gaming and
…show more content…
Everything is equal both human and animals. When we do something, we must get the same result. We must pay for the bad thing that we have done to people and animals.
Finally, it is a good thing to mercy on animals as Islam. This religion can refrain from eating pigs. Al-Albani shows that “If you had mercy on the sheep, then Allah will have mercy on you twice” (Sammer, 2017). It means if you can ignore to kill animals, God will give you mercy too. You will get good things for doing this. In conclusion, killing animal have both advantages and disadvantages. Advantages of killing animals are used for food, out of suffering, and dangerous animals. These reasons are the important point that we can kill animals for surviving and helping them. In contrast, we should not kill animals for these following reasons: the cruel thing, the animal extinction, and contrast to religion. In my opinion, killing animals is not appropriate. If it is necessary to do for food or help them, it can do it. If you kill animals in anger or cruel action, I disagree in this point. Every living thing have value in their own. Human does not want to die while animals are the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This gives the reason for equality as there is not moral explanation why it should not be considered. We make animals suffer greatly in order to satisfy our needs of food. This, according to the author, can be described as speciesism as animals are killed in many horrific ways. It denies any other species interests other from humans in every way because we doing for nothing else but pleasure. Also, Singer suggests that experimenting with other species for human interests is another major form of speciesism.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They shouldn’t be tested on because they don’t do anything to deserve to be tested on. Animals feel pain just like us humans, so if we aren’t treated with that disrespect then why should animals. It’s not fair to the animals. Many animals die each year from how brutal the testing is. After some testing, the testers decide to just dispose of the animals themselves in inhumane ways like the breaking of the neck, or in a more humane way by putting them under medically.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The title of McPhersons work is ‘Why I am a Vegan’ which relates the majority of the work to why killing animals and using their products is wrong. That being said, I would assume almost anyone would find it troubling if someone thought it was ok to kill other humans; this is because humans have rights that animals do not. We have a duty to animals to treat them justly and humanly but they don’t have rights equivalent to ours. McPherson relates his examples to humans so we would be able to relate to the examples and be able to have perspective, however it doesn’t work in this argument. McPherson states that “killing typically interferes dramatically with the victim’s autonomy” yes this is true for humans and it is also true for animals (McPherson 5).…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kind treatment of animals has been heavily emphasized in Islam. In Islam like Judaism, followers are instructed to slaughter the animal by severing the jugular vein to result in quick death to reduce the suffering of the animal. Hunting for sport is denounced as is the cruel killing of animals. This is embodied in the tradition of the Prophet, which states that the bird who has been killed for amusement will ask God to extract justice from its killer on judgment day. Similarly, Muslims are prohibited from burning animals even insects alive as it is a form of torture which induces pain and suffering.17 Further, some rights of domestic animals entailed in the Quran and Hadith are as follows: the owner is responsible for feeding the animal, not starving it or deteriorating its health.…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is only wrong if the hunter is killing the animal as a “just because” reason. It should only be morally acceptable if the hunter is killing the animal for food for survival. Another debatable topic is over whether killing animals should be against the law. Again, in my eyes, no. As I stated in my early paragraphs, if killing animals were against the law we would be so overly populated that the animals would slowly begin to kill us.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rainsford Vs Zaroff

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Zaroff, instinct is no match for what humans possess. Reason is what distinguishes humans apart form animals. Both, Rainsford and Zaroff share similar logic but from opposing views. Rainsford is strongly against the murder of humans merely for sport, whilst Zaroff craves a more "dangerous game” with ingrained reason for an onerous test. Although, Rainsford goes against his own belief and kills Zaroff, which goes to show you are unable to have any morals en-order to succeed then to climactically…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They kill them for fun and place animals in games where their soul purpose is to be shot at. That isn’t a sport, you just shoot defenseless animals who have nothing to fight back with. All form of hunting should be forbidden. Animals feels pain. Humans aren’t the only one who feels pain.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You scream, I scream, we all scream for… VEGANISM! Okay, okay, no we don’t. Let me just start off by saying this is not another vegan advocacy. Trust me, there’s already one too many of those. I’m not here to convince you that not eating meat will somehow magically let you talk to animals or that if you do choose to eat meat you’ll be condemned to hell, although, some people are so ignorant and/or gullible they’d probably believe it.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furthermore, his perspectives are parallel to those of a normal human. He believes that wars and fights are a waste of human life, and that it is unethical to use a human as a gift or article for peace. Lastly, he functions like a normal human being. Grendel kills humans for his survival, which is similar to humans killing various animals in order to live and…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These are two important questions philosophers debate on. This essay will focus on why raising and killing animals for food is morally wrong. Firstly the fact that killing and rearing animals for human consumption means that their rights are violated. As animals raised for food is being used by others rather than being respected for itself. It is being treated as a means to human ends and not as an end to itself.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays