Gun Culture Research Paper

Great Essays
Side 1: Contributing to Gun Culture A. The Second Amendment. Also known as the original gun law states " A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Numerous people today live by this law as they fight the battle to their right to bear arms. We are guaranteed as citizens of the United States of American the right to bear arms. Harsher Legislation concerning gun control or the banning of guns is not the absolute solution to gun violence; it would only be also the abolishment of a right authorized by our founding fathers. Gun ownership proves that as citizens we can and have the right to protect ourselves if there is a threat to national …show more content…
If anything if the laws that are already in place are enforced properly and rigorously, it is then that incidents involving gun violence will …show more content…
With these licensed gun owners support of gun rights believe situations like the Sandyhook Elementary School shooting, the outbreak at Pulse nightclub in Florida, etc. could have been neutralized. However, any sensible gun owner should, in any event, evaluate the situation. Self-defense can be justified, if and only if, a person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm to themselves.There are five components to consider in the process of a self-defense justification: “innocence, imminence, avoidance, proportionality, and reasonableness.” a. Innocence. If the person who initiates the conflict uses self-defense, it can not be justified. Unless the initial aggressor retreats and the other party perseveres or the minister agitation was not deadly, and the another party reacts with deadly force. b. Imminence. When a person is defending themselves, they must react with immediacy. If one seeks self-defense after the deadly occurrence, it is considered

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Gun lobbyists have a right to advocate for laws and policies that they see fit for citizens who own guns. Clinton should not be able take away their right to advocate for policies they believe in. Ultimately, citizens of the U.S. should be able to express their right to keep and bear arms, but the process of obtaining a gun should be stricter in order to keep criminals and other people from using guns in acts…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Like with owning a car or motorcycle, by requiring liability and insurance to gun owners you are protecting not only the gun owners, but anyone who is harmed by them. I believe that because citizens have a prima facie right to own guns, then alternative policies should include enforcing liability to owners and mandating insurance. These legal procedures could be justified because guns are inherently dangerous, and it is reasonable to have people be liable for their own dangerous actions. The moral right to keep and bear arms is upheld by the fundamental moral right of self-defense and the fact that it’s our constitutional right. Gun ownership should not be restricted on the premise that its benefits outweigh the harm it causes.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We simply can not control who can buy guns. However, we can control our rights, and the right to bear arms should never be taken away. Laws on guns should only be passed for storage and handling of guns, not on whether they should be possessed or not. We as the American people need to focus on what truly matters to us and our family, and that is we need a sense of safety. Let 's face out without guns and with law enforcements help a long ways away we need guns to protect ourselves, and without we are asking to be injured or killed by an…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After enforcing stricter gun laws and regulations there would be no reason to completely ban the use of fire arms from the greater American citizens. There are many reason why gun rights should not be taken away from American citizens. First and foremost being that the right to bear arms is an American right given to us by our fore fathers. Taking away our rights to own fire arms is infringing upon our rights as American citizens, a right of the American people that has been upheld for hundreds of years. Why take away these rights when enforcing better laws and regulations can prevent the same…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Debate On Gun Control

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The second amendment is quoted as “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This can be argued form both sides. What anti gun control advocates would say about this is that the people have a right to defend themselves. If the US were to fall or become compromised, it would be up to the citizens to defend themselves from whomever the perpetrators are. Citizens also quote the second amendment when talking about measures that do not refer to protection. Stricter gun laws, or even the banning of certain types of weapons would hinder citizens who enjoy sport shooting.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control Regulation

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For starters one of the biggest things politicians and other people look to when trying to create pro or anti-gun laws is the constitution. Many of the pro-gun supporters will bring up the second amendment which states: “ A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment clearly states that citizens of the United States are allowed to bear arms and that weapons for our military are a necessity for our free country and that this right shall not be taken away. So now that we know what the constitution says about the right to bear arms what do the people who create laws say about gun control and other things related to firearms? When a survey asked what they thought about gun control almost all of them were in favor of background checks to help end gun violence. Some of them said the government should ban large capacity ammunition magazines, semi-automatic assault rifles and make background checks more…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Controversy “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, Shall not be infringed.” My interpretation of the second amendment is me being able to legally purchase a firearm and use it for protection if I need to. I am all for guns however, I do believe there are pros, cons, and gun laws to allow Americans to keep their guns. Guns can definitely be used as a protection based on how responsible gun owners are. In Responsible Gun Ownership Saves Lives, paragraph five and six states how gunfire broke out in Clackamas County Mall in Oregon. Two shot, one wounded, Meli drew his gun on Roberts, saving lives of the innocent shoppers.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control “Gun Control means being able to hit your target, if I have a “hot button” this is definitely it. Don’t even think about taking my guns, my rights are not negotiable and I am totally unwilling to compromise when it comes to the 2nd Amendment” (“Michael Badnarik”). This quote was said by Michael Badnarik. He defends his rights. Gun Control is a set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Amendment reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".There are two debates over this amendment.One would say a state law violates the "right to bear arms" the law is unconstitutional and invalid. The other side would say guns could be helpful in many difficult situations For my being I would like to understand both sides of this debate,…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As young adults growing up in America, we will soon have to face the issues that our country is dealing with.It all comes to reality when we have to start voting or putting in our own opinion. We all are entitled in our own opinion that’s why i feel strongly for guns and the use of guns as we the people of the United states have the right to bear arms , to help prevent crimes and for our own protection. As Americans of the united states we are giving the right to bear arms because of the 2 Amendment allows us to. “ A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state , the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” ( www.archives.gov ) Taken away our rights is like taking about us being American.Our…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics