Stricter Gun Laws In America

Improved Essays
On April 28th 1996 a gun men armed with a semi-automatic rifle shot and killed 35 people wounding 18, after this the government decided that maybe their gun laws needed to be re-looked at. They implement stricter gun laws and even had gun buyback programs for guns that were decided illegal so that no one was losing money. This lead to lower gun related suicides as well as gun related homicides these dropped 65% and 59% respectfully. This was in Australia of course not is America, because in America we hold the
In America we have the right to bear arms written into our constitution as the second amendment. "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
…show more content…
You actually have to know how to safely use it before you are allowed to buy one. In some countries you even have to get references to show that other people would be okay with you owning a gun and or notify your spouse or ex-spouse before buying a gun. Some countries have a wait period before you can get a gun and then make sure that you properly store it afterwards. Finally to obtain a gun in many countries you need to have a good reason, which does not include "for protection". Although it is hard to prove direct causation, countries with stricter gun laws do have lower gun deaths.
A major argument against gun laws is that guns don’t kill people, people kill people. I find this ridiculous of course it is true that by itself a gun cannot hurt anyone. The purpose of these laws is to keep it out of the hands of the people that kill people. If you have nothing to hide and are not planning anything nefarious then you would still be able to own a gun, you would just have to abide by the laws and regulation while purchasing and handling the
…show more content…
They will not accept that your reason for needing a gun is to kill anyone. This makes since to me why would a government who has made it illegal to kill someone then sell a gun to a person who plans to use it to kill someone. The silliest argument against gun control I’ve heard is that you don’t need a gun to commit murder, which is completely true. People kill each other with knives and rocks and even their own hands. These objects have something in common they’re initial purpose is not to kill they also are not able to kill multiple people quickly. A gun was invented for the sole purpose of death whether it was of an opposing soldier in war or an animal during a hunt they were used for killing. They are killing machines and we are handing them out like tic tacs. The scariest part of the lack of gun control in America is that 20% of gun owners own 65% of the guns in America. This means that most of the guns in America are owned by people who have way too many than are necessary for “protection” or “hunting”. In Australia if your reason for owning a gun is hunting rabbits and you already have two rifles for that reason then you will not be allowed to get another because it would be unnecessary and nobody needs that many

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It states that gun control is helpless to avoid kids to use guns. After that, gun control is not a guarantee of reducing deaths. To implement gun control, it means governments restrict the sales, purchases, owning and carrying guns. It is not only ineffective in reducing death rates, but that increases with high speed. Similarly, criminals do not care laws as they illegally do many other things.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can violate the 2nd amendment, which is of course “right to bear arms.” There has been so much in the media about gun control. The majority of the media does not show what concealed and carry is capable of in a positive way, but only the negative. People believe gun control is there to have their guns seized. There are more than enough restrictions on guns, so there for the majority of people that can have guns are safe to be around. This proven claim shows my thesis is correct by having restrictions on guns, is not stopping criminals from obtaining illegal guns, but only making it more difficult for innocent, clean slate civilians to possess…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having gun control in those countries and people are still getting guns makes you want to fear for your life. The use of logos was weak here because if it had failed in those countries, what makes them think gun control laws will be obeyed here in the United States. Their facts show that even though those countries in Europe had stricter gun laws, determined killers still managed to get their hands on weapons. These facts show gun control in America would end up the same as it did in France, England, and Norway, ineffective. The use of logos was ineffective because it was proven killers still had access to weapons in countries with strict gun laws.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of gun possession and the right to bear arms is hot topic amongst most Americans. It has been said that “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” Some argue passionately in saying gun laws should be stricter, while others argue that they have civil rights that need to be protected. My view is somewhere in the middle. I believe there should more specific limits on gun possession, instead of a general law which excludes many Americans from their right to protect themselves. I believe the law that restricts all felons from the right to bear arms is too strict.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People should have the right to protect themselves, their families, and their property, however there are guns that can be purchased that have no real purpose unless you are planning a mass shooting. Of course some people just purchase these because they believe they are cool. I agree that these should be illegal to sell. Gun control would be great, but I believe it is an impossible goal. In a perfect world we would be able to get control, or better yet never have invented such a violent weapon.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Should Guns MUST Be Banned

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Columbine, Newtown, San Bernardino, and Charleston are all examples of the horrors of mankind and the actions they carried out. People pointed to guns as the culprit of those horrors, however the truth remains that people don’t take guns to court, but the person who shot the gun. And there is a reason for that. Although banning guns would make it more difficult to get ahold of them, guns shouldn’t be banned because it may not lower the crime rate and because of our Constitutional right to keep them. The statement heard all of the time now is that guns kill people, that guns are the leading cause of death in the US, and that guns MUST be banned in order to decrease the murder rate.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays