The Importance Of Constitutional Amendments

Improved Essays
The Texas administration said that the "Texas Plan to Restore the Rule of Law" includes constitutional amendments to prohibit Congress from regulating any activity "wholly produced within a state," a category that could include the use of weapons And marriage.

The amendments would also include measures to develop a balanced budget of the United States and would allow states to override federal laws or decisions of the US Supreme Court if two-thirds of the entities disagree.

The plan to deliver a speech Friday in Austin to the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a conservative organization dedicated to promoting and defending freedom, personal responsibility and free enterprise.

The governor explained that the plan would curb the excesses of
…show more content…
"The cure for these problems will not come from Washington D.C.", "Instead, states should lead the way," he said in summoning the other entities of the country to a Convention of States "to correct the cracks of our Constitution."

Amendments to the Constitution proposed by the governor would include the vote of a majority of seven judges of the Supreme Court of Justice to invalidate any law passed by state or federal lawmakers.

The amendments would also prohibit federal agencies, "run by unelected bureaucrats", from creating or formulating federal laws and overruling or invalidating state laws.

One of the amendments would be aimed at restoring the balance of power between the federal and state governments, limiting the former to the powers expressly delegated in the Constitution.

Another amendment would allow state officials to file lawsuits in federal court when federal officials exceed their limits and one more would allow a two-thirds majority of states to override federal law or regulation.

Will ask the State Legislature when it meets in past years to approve Texas' participation in the constitutional convention, something that would also have to be approved by the other state legislatures so that it can actually take

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Since the Convention would fall under the federal government, Congress would be in charge of appropriating money to run the convention. Knowing full and well that Congress could stop providing funds if a disagreement were to arise, Sabato offers up the idea that states would take up the responsibility on such an occasion. The Convention must also hold subpoena power over the federal government in order for amendments to be passed that could potentially affect the federal government. If they were not given this power any work at the Convention could be overturned and…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay Questions: The US and Texas Constitutions Student’ Name Date Essay Questions: The US and Texas Constitutions 1. What are the similarities and differences between the US constitution and the modern Texas Constitution? The US Constitution and the modern Texas constitution are both developed to govern American Citizens, although on different capacities.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The current debate is on whether the Texas Constitution should be rewritten or not. Therefore, here a number of arguments for and against the rewriting of the constitution are represented. The proponents and opponents of the Texas Constitution to be rewritten have strong arguments to support or deny the idea. First of all, the Constitution is too long and needs to be organized. It is one of the constitutions that have gone through many amendments making it more complex and the longest of all the constitutions of the United States (Hooks: 2011).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the Philadelphia Convention, the federalist constitution was opposed by some representatives of the state because they felt it limited the power of the states. They believed that it gave too much power to the central government. Some arguments that were made for in favor of the federalist constitution was that a central government would better protect the rights of the American people. The Supremacy clause stated “that the national government's authority prevails over any conflicting state or local government’s claims” (Morone & Kersh 118) was self evident in proving the fact that the central government, although permitting states reserved powers, would have more power than the states. The changes from Dual Federalism to New Federalism…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 10th Amendment says that the powers not directly granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution or by the States, are reserved to the States and or to the people. This amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not provide an accurate measure of which powers belong to the national government and those which belong to the state government and the people. Due to the lack of specific distinction in the powers, the Tenth Amendment can become very open to interpretation regarding the rights and authority that the state and the national government have over certain issues. To aid in determining the difference in powers, proposed modifications to the Tenth Amendment, which would spell out specific rights of the state government, will be presented and explained.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kristin Paull Professor Jennifer Ritchey Texas Government 2306 September 7, 2015 The Texas Constitution The state of Texas has gone through many constitutional revisions since the first was introduced. It differs in many ways from the federal constitution and has some provisions that are unique to it. The current constitution is continually growing and being revised as times change, to become more modern for our industrialized state.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amendment Pros And Cons

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are many people around the world that would voice their own opinions about changes if they thought that their voices would be heard. Those people are always wondering if their ideas would be good for the country or if it would screw everything up. They do not speak up due to the fact that they are afraid to make mistakes that could cause a lot of damage inside the government or they are scared that they would not get heard at all. Some do not realize the process to get their idea ratified into an amendment. The series of steps that must be underwent can also shock and discourage others when submitting their own opinions of to the government.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781 and contained many weakness that would be changed in The Constitution. One weakness of the The Articles of Confederation was that the States had too much power and there was not a powerful enough central government. Another issue The Constitution attempted to solve was that central government did not have enough power to tax. In both The Articles of Confederation and The Constitution, the States maintained some of the same powers. The Constitution had many significant differences from The Articles Confederation, but some powers remained the same between both documents.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Constitution: Differences and Amendments During any regular or special session, a member of the Texas legislature can propose an amendment to the state constitution. This proposal must be approved by two-thirds of the members of each house of Texas and the Amendment will be voted upon by qualified, registered voters. A brief description, or explanatory statement of the proposed amendment is then prepared by the Secretary of State and approved by the Attorney General.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One formal method of amending the constitution is to get two thirds of both houses and two thirds of the states to agree and then have it ratified. Another method is to get three quarters of the state legislatures to approve. One informal method is executive orders, which are orders by the president on how they are going to implement certain actions, an example of this is former president Obama's immigration laws. Another method is by judicial review, an example of this is that it does not say anything in the constitution about separation of church and state but according to judicial review that is one of the cornerstones. Informal methods are used more often than the formal amendment process because they are easier to do.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pragmatic Approach to Texas's Immigration Introduction The Wall Street Journal's article Texas's Immigration Choices illustrates their agreement and support for Texas's Governor Rick Perry and his position on immigration and border state control. The author has stated, “We think Mr. Perry's positions reflect those of a border state executive taking a pragmatic approach to the economic realities of immigration.” Although Governor Perry's approach is just and has some practicality, it is not appropriately pragmatic and needs to be adjusted. Approach of Practicality In the issue of immigration, the author points out that additional security measures such as more fences or barriers will not solve the issue of illegal immigration.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Article 5 Analysis

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 5 of the Constitution demonstrates that in order for a convention consisting of structural modifications to the Constitution, two-thirds of the states dictate to call a convention, whereas amendment to the Constitution requires the approval of thirty-eight states. According to New York Times Correspondent Michael Wine’s in his news article Inside the Conservative Push for States to Amend the Constitution, Republicans are striving to meet the requirements of Article 5. The overall argument of the Republicans is justified by their desire to enforce a balanced federal budget. The new article translates a few conservatives favoring the convention, the general improvement of the Republican’s request, and the opposition. To begin, former presidential candidates, John Kasich and Jeb Bush, who are involved in the Republican platform, support the convention.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As an antifederalist, the Constitution should be amended according to the needs of the current American society. An Antifederalists argues against the Constitution in attempt to improve upon the rights guaranteed to the people. Contrary to this view, a Federalist believes that the Constitution is acceptable the way it is. However, this is false. The Constitution has several parts that are in need of updates in order to suit the current American society.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The committee can either determine to go further with the bill or completely get rid of it.(Governing Texas, Pg.…

    • 2562 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that each executive does not have to listen to the governor himself and any major change the governor tries to pass has to be approved by each executive. The executives cannot sign laws themselves but have a great deal on the influence of laws that are proposed accordingly with their parts of the executive branch respectively. Each representative may work together under the plural executive but have specialized powers and influence on the decisions being made for the State of Texas. The face of the plural executive would be the Governor with salary at $130,000 for the 2012-2013 fiscal year ("The Plural Executive"). The governor may grant pardons, reprieves, commutations, may veto legislations, call special sessions as well as…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays