Dual Federalism Vs New Federalism

Improved Essays
At the Philadelphia Convention, the federalist constitution was opposed by some representatives of the state because they felt it limited the power of the states. They believed that it gave too much power to the central government. Some arguments that were made for in favor of the federalist constitution was that a central government would better protect the rights of the American people.The Supremacy clause stated “that the national government's authority prevails over any conflicting state or local government’s claims” (Morone & Kersh 118) was self evident in proving the fact that the central government, although permitting states reserved powers, would have more power than the states. The changes from Dual Federalism to New Federalism

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the articles of confederation wasn’t running our country in the right direction. The Articles of confederation had no central power, at all. The Federal government then became the main focus of the two contracts, because it was more stable. Under the Articles of Confederation the state held all the power and they gave some power to the federal government, which caused economic, trading and law problems. The constitution then gave more power to the federal government and gave the states less power because that would give a central power for people.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately at first this motion was defeated after a brief discussion. Following the Philadelphia Convention some leaders during the revolution publicly opposed the Constitution, this became known as “Anti-Federalism”. The opposed because they believed if the National Government became too strong it would also be a threat to individual rights and the President would gain too much. When advocating the Bill of Rights, Jefferson wrote to Madison: “Half a loaf is better than no bread.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They feared that that original text from the Constitution didn’t contain a bill of rights. The Federalist thought the Constitution didn’t need a bill of rights and they thought that the nation would possibly not survive without the passage from the Constitution. They also said that a stronger national government was required since the Articles of Confederation failed for not having a strong enough national…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, concurrent powers, rights granted to both the states and the central government included the right to have courts and borrow money. Finally, the Constitution added a Supremacy Clause, which ensured that the Constitution were above any state-mandated laws. While the Articles of Confederation ensured the power of the states over the central government, the Constitution certified that the central government was the highest…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Two groups that played a key role were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists believed in having a strong central government, whereas Anti-Federalists waned the majority of the power given to the people and were wary of the government having too much control. These groups are similar to Authoritarians and Libertarians of today’s society, respectively. In fact, these group’s differing beliefs sparked one of the disagreements surrounding the Constitution, “One of the many points of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the Constitution’s lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was agreed upon in the Constitution that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson). By stating this it was absolute that those who were in a position of power are there because the people they over-see. Some of the men behind the support for the Constitution were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Although the Federalist strongly supported this change there were many disagreements from the Anti-Federalist group. The main argument came from those who believed this new Constitution would strengthen government at the expense of its people and independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Morris, Paul, Bertram and William 2011, “ Anti-Federalists Those who opposed ratification of the Constitution” ( p. 32). The Federalism represented a transitional point in the history of the United-States of America. This systematic transition created a massive change in the structure of the initiative States. As a result of the first economic system, which was the Federalism, there were loud voices that had a doubt and fought against applying the Federalism all over the States. The Federalism made a great success by achieving the acceptance of most crowds within the first States.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalist felt greatly upset by the Federalist ratification of the Constitution, which had shifted state power into federal hands, while the Federalists wished to keep a Bill of Rights out of the Constitution, because they believed that they could not list each right, and that the rights unstated would be broken and abused. The Federalists eventually won the ratification of the Constitution in large part because they set up the ratification process in a way that would be favorable to them. They had new conventions which were held in states that were favorable to their position first, and they required only 9 of the 13 states to ratify, although the Articles of Confederation had clearly stated that all 13 states would be required in order to agree to any amendments to the…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In order to make better comparisons and contrasts between the political parties of then and now, it is first necessary to analyze the ideologies of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalist of the 1790s had many reasons behind pushing to ratify the Constitution. They believed that a strong central government was vital in order to solve the nation’s problems and to also make economic progress that would make the U.S. recognizable as an economic power. They also believed that the Constitution created a good balance of power that would prevent corruption. Just as the Federalist had reasons for supporting the ratification of the constitution, the Anti-Federalists had their own reasons for rejecting it.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had. So Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What is federalism? Federalism “is a unique relationship between all levels of government that gives each some degree of independence from each other but definitely binds them together through the United States Constitution.” (pg. 69) 2.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays