Rome Decline Essay

Improved Essays
Rome and all of her influence is declining. I fear for those whom live in the very heart of Italy and her fellow surrounding provinces. The man power is declining. To many Roman men have lost their lives to fellow Romans. What example are we setting up for the commoners who see one of the pinnacles of roman society, aristocrat, killing aristocrat. Commoners are already at their breaking point. The Punic wars have drove us into the collapse of the commoners. Those whom had the land were drafted into the war with hopes of loot, gold and other plunder but instead their terms were increased due to rapid expansion. They had less time to serve on the farm, and because the campaigns reached to the end of the worlds, the jungles of sub Asia to the …show more content…
Not by Germanic barbarians, not by Persian armies but by civil unrest. Resources are needed to keep any Empire strong and full of vigor. We can not gain new resources if we do not expand. However we can not expand, if our legions are loyal to their generals more and more often ever since Marius and his war with Lucius Sulla. The victor of these skirmishes can determine the outcome of Rome politically. Take for example Julius Caesar, if it was not for the camaraderie of his men he would never have obtained power and established his rule over Rome. But all these pits of general against general has tired Rome, and all Romans. Romans want, no, they crave stability, economically and politically. The best way may be monarchy, but is the point of our senate not to allow one man rule? If the people want it however they are reserved the right to be ruled this way. Even then they have the tribune of the plebs to watch out for the everyday commoners. Clever enough Octavian can rule, gracefully enough in the past, to appear that he was royal to Rome and it 's people while having the total opposite outcome. His claim to fix Rome in the past was essentially to cover up one man rule in a facade of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pax Romana Essay

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman Empire was at its highest peak during the reign of Augustus, in which he installed the idea of Pax Romana (meaning Roman peace) to bring peace, security, and civilized life to the Roman nation. However, even in the times of happiness and prosperity not all people welcomed the great Roman peace, as demonstrated by the troubles brewing in Egypt, Gaul, and Judea. As Rome began to falter under the economic, political, and military difficulties, many Romanized nations began to withdraw their support. The Roman nobles, rather than invest their money in the industries of Rome, chose to misuse their wealth, causing the economy to come to a halt. So, by the third century A.D. and the end of Marcus Aurelius reign, which ended Pax Romana, the…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our founding fathers actually went through tough decisions on deciding what is best for our nation’s voting process and they concluded with the Electoral College. Overall it promotes good government and it attributes to our diverse nation. “The abolition of state-by-state, winner-take-all electoral votes would speed the disintegration of the already weakened two-party system” (Arthur Schlesinger). The Framers of America wanted our country to have a voting system that wouldn’t hurt the nation in an inefficient way. Although the system may not be perfect it still is the best way we have for electing our…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “He was by then inextricably involved in the affairs of Gaul,”(Ancient 1). and lost powerful friends that eventually ended his life. Caesar could have been a great leader and won many wars before his natural death or death during war but instead he had to be “put down” like a sick dog by the Senate because he was ripping the Empire…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He may have done bad things and things against the way of the Roman Empire but he did it to better Rome and help make the Roman people more free. Brutus wanted to see that Rome is the best that it can be. When he killed Caesar he did it because he knew that Caesar would not be okay to step down from dictatorship and move to a more free government of the people. That is why Mark Antony refers to him as “the noblest Roman of all”. He may not have fit in with the power hungry leaders of the time, like Caesar, but he did want to make sure that the people of his country, Rome, were treated with equality and freedom.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Did Julius Caesar Die

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If he did, I do not believe that he would use Brutus, the right hand of his key opponent, Pompey, as an advisor. So it is clear that Brutus is open to other opinions, at least in politics. It should not interest us what he did in anecdotal examples of his every day life, but what he did as a leader and a politician. Even if he was not open-minded, Rome was always a democracy, so if he gained enough support for his different opinions -but, last time I checked, Brutus did not have any big differences in his policy with Caesar- he would have been able to influence Rome's government through democratic means, Rome's institutions. Killing off his political opposition is never the (right) way to go.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anthony’s eulogy is not only to put an intrigue in the mind of the people about the assassins but also to convince them of the atrocity committed to a great leader. But when focus on Caesar speech maybe he would have succeeded on being a king with a strong control over the republic of Rome and would have extended his plan of ambition at the expense of the Roman nations for his best interests. It is not certain if Caesar would have become dictator of Rome either, as it was obvious that Cassius, Brutus and Decius each one would form their own army and live in a constant civil war for the reason that each wanted ultimate power over the Senate and the political system itself. Caesar is portrait in the play, as a noble and gentle man when he is conversing with his wife, who is trying to persuade him to stay home for fear that something, will happen to him. Brutus on the contrary shows as a man thirsty for avarice and for…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An argument could be made that the ‘Holy’ Roman Empire shaped the way the world is now, but the Fall of Rome was inevitable for three reasons which can be seen in the demise of most great empires. Firstly, the Romans expanded their empire too far from their capital, secondly the creation of enemies due to Rome’s lack of leadership resulted in the land being overrun by foreign nations, and lastly, due to the weakening of the Roman legions, corruption and political instability played a role in the ending of the Roman Empire. During its reign as the world’s foremost superpower, Rome overexpanded and overspent on its military. At its peak, the Roman Empire was 2 million square miles and it stretched across Western Europe, encompassing parts of…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Catiline's Corruption

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It can be argued that one of the causes of the decline of the Roman Empire was an increase in corruption due to greed. The aftermath of Sulla’s proscriptions, the many battles Rome had endured as well as economic turmoil all contributed to Rome’s decline. Catiline sought to heal Rome of its troubles through violent means. Catiline and his supporters conspired to overthrow the consuls, assassinate other government officials and burn the city. Though the conspiracy was stopped before it could properly begin, it revealed exactly how corrupt Rome had become.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lastly, Champion would concur with the other authors that there existed political reasons for Roman engagement in war. The Republic was unique in that officials were elected to their positions. Other nations, such as Greece, had unelected Hellenistic monarchs who would be in office based on being born into the right family. Thus, these nations may have not seen constant engagement in warfare as being necessary to their society. In contrast, the Roman…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Practically, this meant that Augustus would deal with his enemies and political rivals efficiently, while maintaining good relations within the Senate. Although Caesar named Augustus as the heir to his throne, Augustus was denied Caesar’s money, his estates and his political position. Augustus was only allowed to take on Caesar’s name. Augustus accepted this, and formulated a plan to conquer the enemies of his adopted father. In order to achieve this goal, Augustus took out huge loans from the bank of Rome - he then dispensed this money to the citizens, which (naturally) made them favor him.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays