Not by Germanic barbarians, not by Persian armies but by civil unrest. Resources are needed to keep any Empire strong and full of vigor. We can not gain new resources if we do not expand. However we can not expand, if our legions are loyal to their generals more and more often ever since Marius and his war with Lucius Sulla. The victor of these skirmishes can determine the outcome of Rome politically. Take for example Julius Caesar, if it was not for the camaraderie of his men he would never have obtained power and established his rule over Rome. But all these pits of general against general has tired Rome, and all Romans. Romans want, no, they crave stability, economically and politically. The best way may be monarchy, but is the point of our senate not to allow one man rule? If the people want it however they are reserved the right to be ruled this way. Even then they have the tribune of the plebs to watch out for the everyday commoners. Clever enough Octavian can rule, gracefully enough in the past, to appear that he was royal to Rome and it 's people while having the total opposite outcome. His claim to fix Rome in the past was essentially to cover up one man rule in a facade of
Not by Germanic barbarians, not by Persian armies but by civil unrest. Resources are needed to keep any Empire strong and full of vigor. We can not gain new resources if we do not expand. However we can not expand, if our legions are loyal to their generals more and more often ever since Marius and his war with Lucius Sulla. The victor of these skirmishes can determine the outcome of Rome politically. Take for example Julius Caesar, if it was not for the camaraderie of his men he would never have obtained power and established his rule over Rome. But all these pits of general against general has tired Rome, and all Romans. Romans want, no, they crave stability, economically and politically. The best way may be monarchy, but is the point of our senate not to allow one man rule? If the people want it however they are reserved the right to be ruled this way. Even then they have the tribune of the plebs to watch out for the everyday commoners. Clever enough Octavian can rule, gracefully enough in the past, to appear that he was royal to Rome and it 's people while having the total opposite outcome. His claim to fix Rome in the past was essentially to cover up one man rule in a facade of