Why Did The Roman Republic Fall

Good Essays
The Roman Republic was indeed a prosperous civilization with advancements in literature, poetry, and architecture, but after an unfortunate series of bad rulers and growing barbarian and Germanic tribe power, the Roman Republic declined and eventually split. A desire for military superiority could also be attributed to the fall of the Roman Republic in taking too much land and spreading troops too thin across their borders. A few select leaders partially paused the Roman Republic decline, but the internal damage was already too severe that a fall would be inevitable. The start of the fall began around after Sulla retired in 81 BC, Crassus and Pompey both fought for the consulship. Pompey then proceeded to make a name for himself in fighting …show more content…
Pompey’s conquests sparking Caesar’s alliance with Crassus and eventual military takeover was the cause for a thinned troop force. With growing opposition surrounding them, generals thought that they could keep Rome a military superpower, but they forgot about the problems within the Roman Republic. No longer was the primary focus of a growing republic agricultural development and commerce, but now is military superiority. Revolts could not change the minds of these power hungry generals who even began reducing upper class pay to fill the void of money they had from ambitious militant campaigns. The resulting uprisings did nothing but hurt the unity of the republic even further.
In conclusion, the decline and fall of the Roman Republic was caused by a desire to remain a military world power and ambitious generals who tried to make that happen at any cost. A battle for the throne among generals to put forth the ideas that they saw fit put at risk many industries that a civilization relies on. Taking people from agricultural and rural areas to be put into defending the borders from growing opposition left the Roman Republic frail from both an economic and militant standpoint. This is what left a once powerful republic constructed under Caesar, Octavian, Antonius, and more frail and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Had there been Roman government that was effective in it’s final stage, the distant Romanized provinces would have kept Roman rule over the barbarians. In conclusion, the Fall of Rome was unavoidable due to three main arguments, the first one being that Rome expanded its empire too far which lead to military overspending. Secondly, the military overspending proved to be infertile, because it deemed impossible to protect such as vast amount of land with the constant attacks from enemy barbarian tribes daily. Thirdly, without supporting leaders and the Roman legions, the empire fell into a long sad spiral into corruption and political unreliability. Therefore, the “‘Holy Roman Empire is [no longer] holy, nor Roman, nor an empire’…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The fall of the western Roman Empire was not caused by the barbarians’ attempts of invasion. Rome fell because a failing tax system and internal strife. The tax system was failing because the Roman Empire had overspent on military exercises and the coin had depreciated in value. As the coin depreciated, taxes were raised and the wealthy fled the cities in an attempt to avoid paying taxes. It is clear that the Roman government understood the threat of usurpers and the dangers that they posed to a united country because the emperors went to great lengths to stop usurpers.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Decline of Rome The most significant factors that contributed to the downfall of the Western Roman Empire were barbarian invasions due to a weakened military and a shrinking population that held resentment towards Rome. These problems converged and created a domino effect that eventually toppled the dignified Roman Empire. Rome had lost the essence of what made the Roman empire Roman. This included a disciplined and driven military made of confident soldiers who believed in the power of Rome. This army protected and expanded Rome’s borders which was exemplified by the rule of Trajan (98-117).…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the detritus of the Peloponnesian War, the agrarian fighting of the old polis was ended. Warfare now meant expansion of conflict onto a variety of costly and deadly new horizons, where past protocol meant little. The Greek genius was freed to apply capital, technology, and manpower to war without ethical restraint, but in the process the old idea of a city-state was lost. I…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Rome Fell Essay

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An economic downfall is most likely the reason why the roman empire fell because without money to fund its captured city garrisons the Romans couldn 't hold their lands, and since they couldn 't hold their lands, the people revolted against them. With that Rome would have to hire mercenaries to keep the peace, which would be a further drain on the money Rome had. Some might say it was due to the Barracks emperors, but at that point the dominoes were already falling. Others might say it was due to the adoption of Christianity, but that only affected parts of the Roman empire.. All in all everything in this world revolves around money, if you don 't have it, there is no way you can…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As Caesar began to gain power he became an obvious threat to the Roman Republic. Caesar was loved by the people but not by the higher ups in Rome, who feared his rise of power (Shmoop). People of Rome had abandoned their work to celebrate Caesar. During this time in the Roman Republic, anyone’s rise in power from the people was viewed as a threat. However, Caesars death results in a Roman Civil War.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Such an army can be considered unbeatable, but the Huns – who were “a confederation of warrior bands” – will try to march against them, only to find themselves getting the unavoidable defeat. The defeat is devastating, and the Huns, realized the power of the opponent they are fighting, will need to compromise. Under the ruling of Attila and Bleda, the Huns sets peacful terms with the Romans, in which they insist on helping the Empire with their conquest in trade for lands and peace. The Romans, seeing the Huns as a source of strong and brave warriors, accepts the term. As a consequence, the Huns finds themselves no longer under the threat of being attacked by the Romans, but then, they end up under the supervision of the Empire, and the process “ Romanization” will continue to do its job.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two reasons to support the claim that military mistakes lead to the fall of the Roman empire are that the couldn’t conscription and that they didn't have the right armour. To begin with, the first reason why Rome fell is that the soldiers didn't want to wear all the armour and because they were lazy and carless. According to the Vegetus excerpt, Document B, the Roman Army it states, “the customary armour began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely wore it therefore they first asked the emperor to set aside breastplates…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If a certain person did not like the emperor than he would have the emperor 's guards kill the emperor and give the title to the person who paid the most money. With little to no military forces remaining, Rome turned to foreign tribes for help. At first the Germanic tribes fought for the empire and the plan to reach out for help was a success. However, the leaders of these tribes wanted one thing, power. Most of the…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Louis XIV decided to fund the American effort, not because he liked the new world, but because of his hatred for England. He believed that if the Americans were able to defeat the English, France could finally lay claim to valuable English colonies. While he had rationalization for funding the Americans, his contributions ruined France financially and plunged them into deep debt. This left virtually no money for the country to address the class divide and social and economic problems stirring at home. Something had to be done to raise revenue, and higher taxes were an obvious…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays