Double Effect

Great Essays
Technological advances have prolonged human life and changed not only what it means to practice medicine, but what it means to be alive. In some cases, patients turn to their physicians to assist them in dying. The purpose of this essay is not to promote physician aid in dying or even provide a stance on the subject. Rather, the purpose is to question the moral distinction between physician aid in dying and the doctrine of double effect. Through defining these two terms and analyzing medical cases where killing a patient is morally permissible, I argue that there is no moral distinction between physician aid in dying and the doctrine of double effect.
Originating from “Thomas Aquinas’…discussion of the permissibility of self-defense in the
…show more content…
Under U.S. law, adult patients with capacity have the right to accept and to refuse treatment. Though a patient accepts treatment, that patient at any time may request to withdraw treatment, even if the consequence of withdrawal is death. Take patient A for example. Patient A has condition X and needs a G-tube to stay alive. A is not conscious and therefore cannot give informed consent. A does have a health care agent and the agent gives permission to the clinician. So, A is given a G-tube. After two months of not getting better, the agent asks the clinician to withdraw the G-tube, knowing that withdrawal will lead to A’s death. After some discussion, the clinician withdraws the G-tube and A dies. Here the doctrine of double effect need not be invoked. This is the same for withholding treatment, if A needed a G-tube and A’s health care agent refused placement, the clinician would withhold treatment and A would die. Again, both are done in clinical practice and are seen as ethical and legal without invoking the doctrine of double effect. So, what distinguishes these three cases from physician aid in …show more content…
However, for the sake of the argument, let’s assume that the intent of the clinician is to relieve the patient’s pain in cases invoking the doctrine of double effect. How does the intent and details of the case using the doctrine of double effect differ from the intent and details of the case using physician aid in dying? Take a look at the chart below.

Theory Invoked doctrine of double effect physician aid in dying

Patient A Patient B
Agent Providing clinician clinician
Medication

Agent Administering clinician patient

Intent of Clinician relieve pt.’s pain relieve pt.’s pain

Means to Relieve titrated pain killer lethal dose of medication all at once
Pt.’s Pain

End Effect patient A dies patient B

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Michael Gill’s article “A moral defense of Oregon’s physician-assisted suicide law” he defends the law against two objections by providing arguments from opponents of PAS and proponents of PAS. The first objection that Gill defends is “that it is intrinsically wrong for someone to kill herself” (2005). The second objection is that “it is intrinsically wrong for physicians to assist someone in killing herself” (Gill, 2005). The physician assisted suicide law allows terminally ill residents of Oregon who are mentally competent and have less than six months to live to request a doctor to prescribe a medication that will cause a quick and painless death.…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors carry a lot of responsibility; they are expected to save and of fix lives. Patients know there are medical miracles, and everyone wants to be that miracle. But doctors understand the reality. If someone is suffering terminally ill, is it ethical for a doctor to end the misery? Or should they wait around for the very slim chance of a medical miracle?…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal in Every State When it comes to the topic of physician-assisted suicide, most of will readily agree that the patient has their right to choose their form of treatment; if they chose death, then the reasoning is that they chose to die with dignity. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of, does allowing patients to die under a doctor’s care deem the death as murder. Some are convinced that it does, other maintain that allowing patients to do so in tern, breaks the Hippocratic Oath. Here in the states, we are very fortunate with every law and amendment that gives us the right to do with what we want with limits.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In every state in America except Oregon and California, it is permissible to withhold treatment and let a patient die, but impermissible for a physician to take direct action to assist the patient in ending their life. Both scenarios involve a patient dying, and highlight the difference between letting a patient die and killing them. Either way, the patient is giving up all hope of a cure, medical breakthrough, miracle, or even an extended life. Dan Callahan, an advocate of keeping physician suicide illegal, highlights the metaphysical, moral, and historical arguments against physician assisted suicide that violate the integrity of the medical profession by intentionally killing. The US courts have already set precedents against physician assisted suicide, as there is no fundamental liberty interest in legalizing assisted suicide.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States of America, the legality of physician-assisted suicide or “Active Euthanasia” has been the topic of a highly debated political controversy. Whether there is a morally relevant difference between “Active Euthanasia” and “Passive Euthanasia”, or more simply between doing and allowing harm is at the center of this dispute. Two American philosophers, James Rachels and Bonnie Steinbock share their outlooks on the topic in their essays Active and Passive Euthanasia (1975) and The Intentional Termination of Life (1979). Steinbock argues that Rachels has misinterpreted the standard view on the subject, or the view in which the American Medical Association has published, and refutes Rachel 's conclusion. However, Rachel 's provides…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The patient must make this decision on his own, and cannot be persuaded by someone else. A patient must receive options for alternative treatments, and given time to consider all of his possible options available to him. The requirements put in place ensure that only those who truly feel suffering and pain have the option of assisted…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Physicians be allowed to assist in patient suicide? Physician or doctor-assisted suicide has been one of the most debated issues in the last few years. Physician assisted suicide when a doctor supports a fatally sick or immobilized person to take their own life, either by consuming drug or advises on what way to practice to do suicide with. There are many ethical and moral opinions regarding physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide is one of the most controversial ethics topics in society today. Many believe that physician assisted suicide should be legalized across the U.S because of the positive impact it could have on those with terminal illness who want to avoid prolonged suffering in hospice care. Suicide with a medical professionals assistance is also justifiable as a person 's right because it in no way affects or endangers another person 's rights. If physician assisted suicide is legal for those who are mentally competent it could relieve pain for not only the person but their loved ones. On the other hand, it becomes debatable when taken into terms of religious and moral beliefs, many disagree with those who believe that it…

    • 1306 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the many ethical dilemmas surrounding health care today is physician assisted suicide. Many will misinterpret this as Euthanasia because they both accomplish the same goal, causing the death of a person. However, physician assisted suicide is different because of the way that death is accomplished. Boudreau and Somerville (2014) explain that, “In assisted suicide, the person takes the death-inducing product; in euthanasia, another individual administers it” (p. 2). The physician in the case of physician assisted suicide is removed from the actual act of death.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Active Euthanasia

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Patients who are in critical care are often isolated from their families and the public in order to protect and stabilize their condition and are constantly being watched over by nurses. The dying patient is no longer a living being, but is a living corpse with a low quality of life. Doctors are not obliged to prolong the life of a patient, but are obliged to meet their basic needs, which could be, but is not limited to dying with dignity. If the principle of beneficence were to be exemplified in a case in which a terminally ill patient wanted to end their pain,…

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays