Richard Selzer Mercy Summary

Improved Essays
Doctors carry a lot of responsibility; they are expected to save and of fix lives. Patients know there are medical miracles, and everyone wants to be that miracle. But doctors understand the reality. If someone is suffering terminally ill, is it ethical for a doctor to end the misery? Or should they wait around for the very slim chance of a medical miracle? Richard Selzer’s “Mercy” explores the idea of a medical murder, from a morphine injection to a not so medical strangulation thought. The paranoid doctor contemplates his morals as a suffering man is on his death bed. In this doctor’s mind, there is a difference between murder for medical purposes and just plain murder. Murders, or at least the murders portrayed on TV shows, are almost …show more content…
But for this patient, it did nothing more than basically put him to sleep. The doctor is panicking because “the man will not die” (Selzer 145). Somewhere in his mind, the doctor is uncomfortable with his decision of taking this man’s life. The family knew what would happen if the doctor gave this man more morphine. As the man laid in his bed, rolling around in agonizing pain, the family continues to tell the doctor to “do it, do it now” (Selzer 143). The man had been the doctor’s patient for seven years, so at some point the doctor developed some kind of personal attachment to this patient. After giving the man the morphine that should have ended his life, the doctor said “I did not murder him. I am innocent” (Selzer 145). The doctor feels guilty because he was the one to empty the morphine filled syringes into the man’s veins. The doctor was doing as the family wished, not what he thought was right. The doctor didn’t want the man to suffer, but he also didn’t want to be the reason for this man’s death. After the strangulation thoughts, the doctor exists the man’s room in a panic to see the family patiently waiting. As the doctor is telling the family that he just isn’t ready to die, the woman says “He is ready, you ain’t” (Selzer 146). If the doctor was so uncomfortable with the thought of a medical murder, why did he even consider a much more personal murder? For the sake of the man’s comfort and the family’s …show more content…
For this doctor, his personal thoughts came up following a lethal morphine injection. The uncomfort he felt after “helping” this man showed in the panicking tendencies, seeing the IV pole with watching eyes and saying he was innocent for not killing the man. Although the doctor was uncomfortable, he did exactly as the patient and family asked. So did this doctor murder his patient? In the doctor’s eyes he did, but it was for a medical reason, not a personal one. The doctor’s intentions were right, he just wanted to help with his patient’s pain and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This case centers around a conversation between Dr. Wolfe and one of his patients, Hal Crane. The two men are talking about Crane’s urges and thoughts about killing people, additionally, Dr. Wolfe seems to believe that Crane is a paranoid schizophrenic. There are many justifiable motives to have Crane committed against his will. For example, during the conversation everything Crane was saying seemed premeditated meaning he has been entertaining the idea of murdering somebody for a while. A key instance of the premeditation is how Crane knows precisely who he would kill.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This also consistent with respecting individual liberty and patient dignity (Starks, 2013). Further, if terminally ill patients that are dependent on life support have a right to refuse further treatment that prolongs their life then the principle of justice would indicate that other patients in suffering should be permitted to have an assisted death. Moreover, if the patient has competently decided that assisted suicide is desirable, they have decided that death is a lesser evil than their continued existence and so the physician should have no moral objection to euthanasia (Sikkema, 2017). Moreover, there are many other methods of suicide that are arguably more dangerous than controlled physician assisted suicide (Starks, 2013). Finally, in cases where it may not be possible to relieve pain and suffering, an assisted death is seemingly the compassionate and humane response.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is showing that this is the worst fate a person can receive. This issue also joins to the issue of sin that the physician committed which caused him…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics and concerns in our society. It crosses many social, political, emotional and moral boundaries which is something many subjects cannot do all at once. This paper is meant to show my personal view on this controversial subject. Margaret Battin’s article ‘Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,’ discusses three moral principles that are typically used to argue for the legalization of euthanasia as a regulated practice. These three principles are; the Principle of Mercy, the Principle of (patient) Autonomy, and the Principle of Justice.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    So what really is the role of the physician during lethal injection? Physician participation serves as an illusion that capital punishment can be conducted humanely. Physicians have no social duty to participate in executions. Yes, those who choose to participate do so out of beneficence, but “if physicians…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I’ll stop,” I told him as I injected him with the pain medication.” ( Huttman 817). Physician’s usually grow a bond with the patient because in order to consider assisted suicide, the patient must have about six months to live until death therefore, when they beg to end their life, physicians do it with compassion because they could no longer see the patient suffering or begging. In retrospect, between Physician Assisted Suicide, physician should consider palliative care as a last resort in many cases.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A decade into the brave new world of the 21st Century attempts to legalise assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia through courts and parliaments became commonplace around the globe. But it was 15 years earlier that the Northern Territory of Australia became the first place in the world to pass legislation to legalise voluntary euthanasia. The Rights of the Terminally Ill Act which came into effect in 1996, allowed a doctor, in defined circumstances, to comply with a request from a patient to end the patient's life or assist the patient to end his or her own life. This controversial Act lasted just 9 months before being overturned by the Australian Federal Parliament.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think the best way to approach these situations is not to ask the doctor for assistance in dying, but refusing treatment. For those who cannot consent and are in very poor condition I think families should be allowed to decide to take their loved ones off any machines and let their body take their natural course whether that is living or eventually dying. That is more morally right than expecting another human being to carry the burden of deaths on their shoulders and taking away their duty to save lives. This is more morally correct because many years ago we did not have the medication and treatment we had today, so those who wish to die can do so naturally through their disease or condition. Citizens should have the right to live, but not the right to ask doctors to help them die.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a very controversial topic. Many people think that physician assisted suicide is ethical and should be performed on those who are terminally ill and others think that physician assisted suicide is not ethical or moral and think that physicians who are associated with physician assisted suicide should lose their licenses and go to court. But why let a loved one suffer? If someone is terminally ill and in chronic pain all the time they should be able to have a dignified, pain free death. A prescription of a lethal dose is quite a peaceful way to go.…

    • 2418 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In one of my lucid intervals, during those days of agony, I asked my physician to discontinue all life supporting services or show me how to do it. He refused and told me that someday I would appreciate the unwisdom of my request” (243). This is evidence where the doctor was not less than an angel who did not lose hope and took the risk of saving his patient and bringing him back from the point where all his hope was gone and he simply wanted to end his life and free himself from all the pain. Not only that, by taking the risk he got more time to see smiles on his family’s faces who have been in grief since the time he was in hospital. Saying no to death and yes to life gave him more time to enjoy his life a little…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the doctor takes if upon his self to over dose this cancer patient with pain killers to kill him off the…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I don’t necessarily agree with euthanizing nor ending someone’s life in terms of that is the best answer for them. The only time I would agree in euthanasia are when either the patient is in their last stages of their medical conditions and no treatment is able to prolong their life or maybe when the patient begs you to end their life and you abide to their decisions. For an example, if Dr. Quill’s patient, Patricia, is in their last stage of leukemia and her body is not responding to all the possible treatment options out in the market and nothing the physician can do to prolong her life, that’s when I would have to think about other possibilities. If there really is nothing that the physician can do, we…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays