Analysis: A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis Thompson

Improved Essays
All Persons Have a Right to Life
The idea of abortion is always a tough subject to talk about. Some people believe it is morally right to have an abortion but some people like Judith Jarvis Thomson think it is wrong to have an abortion. Thompson does just argue that abortion is wrong, she claims that abortion can be justifiable. Judith is right in her belief that abortion is wrong because the fetus is an innocent person and killing an innocent person is always wrong. Most importantly she believes that every person has a right to life and explains why she thinks that in an article she wrote.
Judith Jarvis Thomson, a Professor of Philosophy at M.I.T is greatly known for her article. “A Defense of Abortion”. In her article she continues to argue the idea that every person has a right to life. She doesn’t just include the thought of the fetus being hurt/killed but also the idea that the mother that is carrying the child could also be hurt. One main point that Judith claims is that the fetus and mother are both
…show more content…
With her analogies Thompson also tries to show that a fetus’s right to life does not consist in the right not to be killed, but in the right not to be killed unjustly (477). She then continues to explain her thoughts on if a mother was pregnant due to rape. Thomson states that the mother has not given the unborn person a right to the use of he body for food and shelter (477). It is understood that the mother didn’t give the baby the right to be in her body because she didn’t chose to be abused. In cases like this it is hard to harm the fetus. As Thomson believes, the baby doesn’t necessarily have a right to the mother’s body because the mother was wrongfully harmed and has no intentions of having a child. In a situation like this, Thomson believes that it would be okay to have an abortion as long as the fetus isn’t

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Every unborn child should have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the second and third trimester. In 2010, research shows that states indicated that unborn children are considered humans under tort, property and criminal law (Roden, 2010). By these laws shown, a mother shouldn’t get to choose whether the fetus lives or dies. The unborn child is its own person and by a mother aborting her own child should be considered murder. Under law a child is supposed to be born for many different reasons, including being capable of having a legacy (Roden, 2010).…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mother that is carrying the child still has rights to autonomy and control over herself. Yet, the fetus also has the right to life and right to life without harm. Minkoff and Paltrow states, “In so doing, they suggest a need to balance rights when those rights appear to conflict with each other, a potentially to subordinate the rights of the women to those of the fetus” (Minkoff and Paltrow, p. 757). Minkoff and Paltrow suggest that unborn children have rights and pregnant women have value.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She gives us the example of a famous violinist that has kidney failure and is hooked up to our body for nine months in order to survive. She continues to say that we did not volunteer to hook up our body. This was an interesting point to include as it relates to unplanned pregnancies and rape cases. This article focuses on the moral aspect of abortion. One of the big questions that Thomson argued was “who is more entitled to the right to life?”…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She suggests that a parent becomes morally obligated to the fetus when they decide to not have an abortion and do not try to prevent a pregnancy and therefore allow the baby to be born without efforts of adoption. When they take the baby home, they assume responsibility for the child and cannot withdraw support from the child. She believes that just because of biological relationships, there is no special obligation to it. They can choose to assume responsibility or they can choose to not take responsibility. Until they accept responsibility, it is morally permissible to have an abortion.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases are supposed to be analogous to cases of rape, threat to life, or when a woman has taken reasonable precautions not to get pregnant. Thomson does not, however she concludes that abortion is justified in any and every case. There is a moral requirement to be a Minimally Decent Samaritan as Thomson puts it, and this makes a late abortion wrong if it is done just for the sake of convenience. To use her example, it would be wrong for a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy to get an abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But it is not said that you cannot do anything to save yourself. No matter how innocent the child is, you do not have to stand by while the child crushes you to death. Thompson relates the house to a mother’s body, to which we do not allow the right of self-defense. But if the woman is housing the unborn child then it should be remembered that it is her…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless, a person’s right to life is stronger than the mother’s right to her body Therefore, the fetus may not be killed and the abortion may not be performed The premise that Thomson rejects is premise 3 (Therefore, the fetus has a right to life.) It can also be said that Thomson rejects premise 3 by questioning what “right to life” in premise 1 (Every person has a right to life.)…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren mainly emphasizes that “the rights of an actual person always outweighs those of a potential person” (Munson & Ian, 2016, p. 493). Just like the “anti” abortion views, Warren finds it always permissible to receive an abortion when due to rape. The woman carrying the child is an actual person who participates in the community around her, while the fetus has the potential to be a person just as the woman. But the fetus has yet to become this actual person. Warren would argue against Marquis view, that the value of the future for the woman carry the fetus is more important than the future of the fetus.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the piece written by Thomson she spoke about the mom having a cardiac condition. This is an example as to why a woman would want to get an abortion for her health and also ensuring that when she does choose to have a child she will be there for her baby and love he or she unconditionally. An example of over using abortions is just simple not using contraceptives and aborting the baby because you chose not to use protection. This is a reason that some may feel the need to get rid of abortions altogether but in the end there will always be exceptions to…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, an abortion in the seventh month of the pregnancy without any complications, is more indecent then an abortion in the third month with complications. Thompson concludes by stating that although mothers have the right to abort their fetuses that does dot grant them the right to kill them if the fetus survives the abortion and that abortion is not strictly either morally permissible or morally impermissible but depends on the…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, she uses examples to try to explain why abortion is not an immoral act as she treats the fetus as an invader to the woman’s body. Some people however do not agree with Thomson’s depiction of how she defended why abortion should be allowed. With this in mind, I will try to argue that abortion is not an immoral act since women have the right to do whatever they so choose to do with their body, especially in the case that the fetus is as Thomson…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A human life begins start at the time of the conception. A children does not deserve to be kill for the irresponsibility of their parent. According to Life Site News, "Abortion is a defining human-rights issue of our time.." (Ricker 1). Everyone stands up for their own human rights, but when it comes to abortion no one stands up for the baby’s human rights.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays