Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion By Thomson

Improved Essays
In ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Thomson argues for the fact that there are certain cases where abortion is permissible and certain cases where abortion is impermissible. Thomson starts her argument by explaining that people contemplate their views on abortion by trying to determine a specific time period of when a fetus is considered a human being – some believe this is at contraception and others believe this is at birth. Whatever the case, Thomson uses an analogy of an acorn to demonstrate a pro-choice view. She relates that the development of an acorn into an oak tree does in fact not mean that acorns are oak trees. Much like how we cannot say that a recently fertilized egg is a human being. Thomson tells us these arguments are called “slippery …show more content…
Number one tells us the killing of an innocent person is always impermissible and abortion is killing an innocent being, therefore abortion is never permissive. Number two explains that directly killing an innocent human is murder and murder is never permissive, therefore abortion is impermissible. Number three of the conditions says that it is more important to restrain from directly killing an innocent person than it is to keep a person from dying, therefore, abortion is not permissive. Lastly, number four tells us that if someone is stuck between the choice to directly let a person die or directly kill an innocent person, they must let the person die therefore an abortion may not be performed. Thompson argues that all of these conditions are false. She rebuttals against the second condition by saying that if the killing of an innocent person is murder and murder is never permissive then the mother is letting the innocent person inside of her die by not having an abortion to save herself and thus breaking the second condition. But the conditions say nothing about the mother performing an abortion on herself to save her own life. They do not say she must refrain from trying to save herself or that she must sit by and await her …show more content…
A mother does not have many options when it comes to giving herself an abortion so we have to look at what a third party can do. Thompson asks us to imagine being in a very tiny house with a rapidly growing child. As the child begins to grow you smoosh closer and closer against the wall until you are finally crushed to death, whereas the child will be fine. Both you and the child are innocent and the child is unintentionally causing you harm. Now, this is what makes it hard for a bystander to help because they are unable to choose between your life and the child’s life. But it is not said that you cannot do anything to save yourself. No matter how innocent the child is, you do not have to stand by while the child crushes you to death. Thompson relates the house to a mother’s body, to which we do not allow the right of self-defense. But if the woman is housing the unborn child then it should be remembered that it is her

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Phil 3 Dakota Wensley Phil 3 The purpose of this paper is to analyze Judith Jarvis Thompson’s argument for the permissibility of abortion in the cases of consensual sex when contraception was used. This paper will be divided into four parts. I am going to present Thompson’s argument and analogy and present the premises and conclusion, I will then put forth the best argument against Thompson’s argument and compare the two on the basis of logic and truth, next I will attempt to speak for Thompson and try to rebuttal on her behalf, and finally I will decide which argument is better and provide reasons for my decisions.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although I make the start of a rational and mature argument, Thomson would respond in the following way. She acknowledges that her argument can be found unsatisfactory “ First, while I do argue that abortion is not impermissible, I do not argue that it is always permissible” (Thomson, J. Judith). Thomson agrees that if the minimal requirement is to carry the fetus to term then the minimally decent mother shall not fall below. There are certain circumstances that she deems abortion to be impermissible.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The newly fertilized ovum is no more a person than an acorn is an oak tree. Suppose we assume, just for the sake of argument, that the fetus is a person with the right to life from the moment of conception. It does not follow; she argues that abortion is never justified. She appeals to a series of imaginary cases, such as being kidnapped and plugged into a famous violinist, being trapped in a tiny house with a growing child, and having people seeds growing in your carpet. Reflection on these cases shows that the right to life is only the right not to be killed unjustly; it does not entail the right to use your body or to live in your house.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, Thomson also says that in situations in which a parent has chosen to assume responsibility for a child, it is their obligation to follow through and take care of the child. This is where Thomson draws the line on whether or not abortion is ethical. If the…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless, a person’s right to life is stronger than the mother’s right to her body Therefore, the fetus may not be killed and the abortion may not be performed The premise that Thomson rejects is premise 3 (Therefore, the fetus has a right to life.) It can also be said that Thomson rejects premise 3 by questioning what “right to life” in premise 1 (Every person has a right to life.)…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is the application of ethical approaches to issues, controversies, theories, and ideas. It is in one’s nature to seek answers to questions which are asked. It is also in one’s nature to question and decide if an idea or ideal is right or wrong, but in the case of ethics; permissible or impermissible. In this text, we are going to use these terms as acceptable or permitted and vice-versa. In this essay, we will be analyzing the article, “A Defense of Abortion” by philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thompson.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of mothers who become pregnant and their lives come to risk due to their pregnancies, it would be unjust to expect them to carry a baby which results in their own death. It is then that the mothers own right to life is at stake, and it is reasonable to allow leniency for such a…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She presents the view that the right of the mother to her bodily integrity carries greater value than the right to life of the fetus. She presents very convincing cases in instances where the pregnancy is due to violence – through rape or abuse, and a somewhat weaker argument that applies to unwanted pregnancies that occur even though reasonable precautions had been…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson and Hursthouse both have come to the conclusion that abortion is impermissible but there are acceptable situations in which abortion should be permitted. In my opinion I agree with both Thomson and Hursthouse but in the end the conclusion of Hursthouse is the view I could see making both sides of abortion acceptable. When a woman and man conceive a baby knowingly, getting an abortion will only occur in the event of a health risk or the chances of the baby living after birth will be so minimum. By choosing abortion before letting the child get to full term is less painful than carrying the baby to full term and giving themselves false hope. It is understandable that some may want to fight for that chance but there is the option of abortion.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, an abortion in the seventh month of the pregnancy without any complications, is more indecent then an abortion in the third month with complications. Thompson concludes by stating that although mothers have the right to abort their fetuses that does dot grant them the right to kill them if the fetus survives the abortion and that abortion is not strictly either morally permissible or morally impermissible but depends on the…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where Thomson addresses John Paul II’s missed premise about the content to the right to life, leads his argument to be an invalid conclusion. She also touches upon and disagrees that the fetus’s rights outweigh that of the mother whereas Paul II believes otherwise. Warren chooses to elaborate Thomson's objections with the argument of what constitutes as person, and personhood, with the five traits that a fetus does not satisfy. Thus, according to these counterarguments the traditional argument loses its validity; leading to my own conclusion that the argument is invalid. References: Thomson, J. (1971).…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Performing the abortion would be directly killing the child, whereas doing nothing would not be killing the mother, but letting her die.” The conclusion that is drawn from this scenario is that your own right to life gives you the moral right to “unplug” yourself if your life is threatened. Equally, if there is a risk of the mother dying, she has a right to end the pregnancy in order to save herself. It cannot be considered murder to kill someone in order to save yourself. This analogy shows the extreme view to be false.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics