Strengths. Strengths of the TMRDMC are continuous IP collaboration and communication, reflection in and on the interaction with the client, and its holistic approach.
The explicit inter-disciplinary collaboration and the depicted comprehensive domains of professional practice provide strength to the model. It gives direction for collaborators on how to participate in a team setting. The members must consider all the IP domains and work within their level of expertise. The collaboration process provides the opportunity for each clinician and the client to lead.
The circular component of the model shows the continuous nature of the dynamic aspects presented and adds simplicity to the collaborative and interrelated communications between the client, family and clinicians. The various colours help to highlight and identify the different components of the model. …show more content…
The connection between the ladder and the “reflection in and on action” reminds the user, that reflection constructs the metacognition of critical thinking (Christensen et al., 2008). The arrows remind the clinician to continuously implement reflection in their practice.
Limitations. A novice clinician may find the numerous components of the collaborative circle a limitation to the TMRDMC. However, these components are necessary to identify the PEOP (Christiansen et al., 2005) ,ICP(Orchard et al., 2010) and the ICF (Bruyère et al., 2005) frameworks within the model. As well necessary are the biopsychosocial aspects and the intrinsic/extrinsic factors needed for a
The explicit inter-disciplinary collaboration and the depicted comprehensive domains of professional practice provide strength to the model. It gives direction for collaborators on how to participate in a team setting. The members must consider all the IP domains and work within their level of expertise. The collaboration process provides the opportunity for each clinician and the client to lead.
The circular component of the model shows the continuous nature of the dynamic aspects presented and adds simplicity to the collaborative and interrelated communications between the client, family and clinicians. The various colours help to highlight and identify the different components of the model. …show more content…
The connection between the ladder and the “reflection in and on action” reminds the user, that reflection constructs the metacognition of critical thinking (Christensen et al., 2008). The arrows remind the clinician to continuously implement reflection in their practice.
Limitations. A novice clinician may find the numerous components of the collaborative circle a limitation to the TMRDMC. However, these components are necessary to identify the PEOP (Christiansen et al., 2005) ,ICP(Orchard et al., 2010) and the ICF (Bruyère et al., 2005) frameworks within the model. As well necessary are the biopsychosocial aspects and the intrinsic/extrinsic factors needed for a