Harman And Embryo

Improved Essays
There are two possible considerations that are argued. The first being that at the stage of conception, human embryos and fetuses have equal rights to human beings. In Elizabeth Harman’s article, Judith Jarvis Thompson argues that “a fetus has a full moral status of a person [and] abortion is nevertheless permissible” (Harman). The second argument is that human embryos have some legal rights in comparison to humans. Elizabeth Harman argues the permissibility of an early embryo’s moral status. She claims that if the early embryo has any moral status at all, then creating and “destroying them to make stem cells” cannot be allowed. (Harman). In other words, it is simply immoral to “sacrifice the life of one human to save another without their …show more content…
However, some doctors stand on the side that it is morally wrong to derive stem cells from embryos in hopes of a cure. Nothing can be guaranteed from stem cell research. Arthur Caplan is the director of the Bioethics Center at the University of Pennsylvania. Caplan, PhD, explained in M.J. Friedrich’s article how embryonic stem cells are not “morally equivalent to embryos or human beings” (Friedrich). He does believe a level of “moral ground” should still be shown to people in favor of stem cell research (Friedrich). But he explains a particular way to show “respect for procreation,” and that is by adding “status to procreation and the creation of embryos... [and] discouraging their creation unless [one] is trying to turn them into a person” (Friedrich). Caplan made an expert opinion when he distinguished the differences between embryos sitting in in-vitro fertilization clinics and the embryos that need to be created for the sole purpose of research. He labeled the embryos sitting in the in-vitro fertilization clinics as "prisoners of the utility industry," because they do not have the same “moral standing” as embryos created for purposes pertaining to research. In his opinion, "no one will claim them [because] they are unwanted …show more content…
Adult stem cell research is the closest alternative to embryonic stem cell research. Adult stem cells are seen as less “available” and less “versatile” than embryonic stem cells, but recent studies have proven their success (“Embryonic Stem Cell Research”). Researchers from America and Brazil extracted stem cells from bone marrow in twenty-three patients with type-1 diabetes. They were successfully able to help twenty of those patients become “insulin-free for a period of time” (“Embryonic Stem Cell Research”). Embryonic stem cells are much more experimental to use on patients because they run the risk of the patient’s immune system rejecting them. Adult stem cells do not run this risk because they are “taken from a person’s own body” (“Embryonic Stem Cell Research”). There have been several medical successes regarding adult stem cells. For example, “on May 21, 2015, FOX News reported that 29 stroke patients who received their own bone marrow stem cells were noted to recover motor skills and speech” (“Embryonic Stem Cell Research”). Another alternative to human embryonic stem cell research is using stem cells found in the blood of the umbilical cord. There are several banks across the United States that people are able to donate cord blood to, post birth; however, researchers still argue that embryonic stem cells are the best stem cells to use because they are capable of turning “into any cell in the human body,”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research is ethical because the rightful owners of the cells chose their fate. Additionally, instead of being discarded the cells are used for a higher purpose. The holders of the embryos should have the option of whether or not they want to discard or donate their cells. Embryonic stem cell research should continue because the donation process is completely…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem Cell Research Ethics

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Science borders a fine line between knowledge and creation, often on the verge of an ethical predicament. Embryonic stem cell research violates the moral ethical standard which scientists must meticulously follow. Those who are against the research are aware of the significance of morals within the scientific community. The sacrifice of one’s potential life for the theoretical medical alleviation of one’s condition entails turning a blind eye from the embryo. An embryo is an unborn child, capable of developing into a unique individual, “Either the embryo is viewed as a person whilst it is still an embryo, or it is seen as a potential person.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality Vs. Evolution on the Improvement of Life: Embryonic Stem Cell Research In Beau Watts' essay "Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Moral Evil or Obligation" (December 2011), the author claims that embryonic stem cells are the answer for humanity to have an overall better life. Watts, an emergency room physician in Kansas City, Missouri explains the complex properties of embryonic stems cells while also discussing the properties of other proponents for altering genes, such as embryonic germ cells, and adult stem cells. He highlights how the other cells are not as promising to use for the research, even though people argue that experiments on embryonic cells are morally unacceptable. The author mentions that people are against embryonic stem…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These stem cells are a simple cell in the body that can develop into any one of various kinds of cells. This means they can become blood cells, skin cells, organ cells, etc. Stem cells and their potential uses are very important to advances in human medicine but the advantages they offer cannot be realized without proper funding. Embryonic…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research on human embryonic stem cells, how ever is controversial, given the diverse views held in our society about the moral and legal status of early embryo.” (National Research 1). Opposers argue that destroying embryonic cells and fetuses to obtain stem cells is something humans should not mess with. The general public believes that biomedical researches are “playing god” by destroying embryonic cells, but scientists have a bigger fear. Scientists fear that stem cell research will eventually lead to the creation of human clones. The reasoning behind this fear…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    God didn’t create them science did. When you look at the moral point of it why would scientist want to clone anyways, is it because they are trying to create a new brand of humans for experiments? There was…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because lives are saved, families are given hope, and a non-curable disease is possibly cured, stem cell research and transplantations are moral practices. For certain groups of American citizens, stem cell research is not a moral or safe practice because it gives “godly” powers to humans, foreshadows the eventual human clones and uses cells from innocent human babies. The counterargument is not valid because it expresses the fear and has no valid point. Additionally, the point that stem cells are using previously destroyed tissue cells to benefit another is being overlooks. Stem cell transplantation and research has the potential of growing in a valuable medical practice that can diminish human suffering and prolong human life as a…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If science can find a way to harness the power of stem cells we could potentially cure many diseases that we currently have no fix for just a way to prolong a person’s life with the disease. Why would we deprive millions of people of something that could save their lives and save their families grief? “In principle, embryonic stem cells can be expanded and then differentiated into most cells lineages of a living organism” (Carson, Christian T). When they say in principle this means it is not a…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Buying the equipment to needed to utilize this would also be relatively inexpensive so it would be especially helpful to hospitals in poorer countries. Another huge pro to stem cell research, if not the biggest one, is the ability to test drugs on stem cells, rather than live subjects like rats or mice. Another significant example of controversy in the medical and science research field is over animal testing. With a little time and funding, scientists could completely take harmful animal testing out of the equation and instead use stem cells to provide accurate results of the drug’s safety. Among the pros I have explained, there are many relevant examples that demonstrate why stem cells should receive more positive recognition and funding from their countries…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people are at polar ends of the spectrum of this debate. Many people are pro-life and do not support the murder of a human embryo for research. Much of this belief is based on the definition of a human embryo. Recent scientific advances in human stem cell research have redefined the human embryo by stating that it does in fact show all signs of life but not necessarily individualism; meaning self-reliant. These further advances have helped to form a decision by the Department of Health and Human Services to fund stem cell research which is dependent upon the destruction of human…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics