Steinbocks Moral Theory

Improved Essays
Chris Ahmad
Phil 116
Paper #1
Human embryos are organisms in early stages of life, typically the first to eighth week of development, and are created by the fertilization of an egg with a sperm. In terms of the argument at hand, early embryos are of interest (14 days after fertilization). They can be obtained in numerous ways and are useful in many types of research, especially medical treatment, due to the fact that they are a source of pluripotent stem cells that are able to divide into many types of cells. Bonnie Steinbock argues that stem cell research isn’t determined solely by moral status and that though the specific embryos discussed do not have moral status, they do have moral value, thus need to be dealt with respectfully (Steinbock
…show more content…
According to Steinbock, both theories claim that embryos lack moral status. It doesn’t matter what idea we adopt when discussing the moral status of an embryo. According to Steinbock, both theories claim that embryos lack moral status. Yet this doesn’t necessarily mean we can treat them however we like. Steinbocks states that a HERP report states that even though human embryos don’t have moral status like young humans (infants or toddlers), they still deserve respect and solemn moral consideration because of the fact that embryos are regarded as a developing form of Homo sapiens life (Steinbock 433). They may lack moral status, but they have moral value. An entity has moral value when it has reasons to treat it in particular ways and not in other ways. In the case of embryos, it has the potential to become a fully developed human and that is why Stenbock is correct in stating that embryos should be respected because of their importance (Steinbock

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Doctors of today have advanced tools and technology to look at an embryo and tell if it is healthy and ready for life. Many mothers experience complication in pregnancy that can lead to a child being born with disabilities. As stated in JUSTIFYING INFANTICIDE AND NON-VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA By Peter Singer, infants can be born with “irreversible intellectual disabilities, will never be rational, self-conscious beings.” With the knowledge of the child’s health before birth it gives a morally difficult question to answer. Should the child be born?…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is a scientific article with the purpose of giving the audience a view of the arguments for and against stem cell research. It emphasizes that scientist want society to understand the importance of embryonic stem cells. This paper opens up with multiple thesis questions such as, “what moral status does the human embryo have?” Counter arguments are provided after the initial claims such as, even though there is no specific point to consider an embryo living, during pre-implantation stages, there is no psychological, physical, and emotional properties, these properties are what makes personhood (3). The paper introduces the religious stances of major religions.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hyun, Insoo. "III. Embryonic Stem Cell Research." Bioethics. Ed.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The true discussion now lands on the weeks prior to 24 which an embryo is not guaranteed rights. Science has given us ability to test, listen, and see how an unborn child interacts in the womb much as it would as if brought forth into nature. The rights have been debated socially, morally, and religiously for decades, but in recent years humankind can prove that an unborn child is a human and in the United States that person is guaranteed…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Examination Overall, there is divergence in the opinions of the public, researchers, and politicians in regards to the ethics of embryonic stem cell research and the responsibility of policies in setting restrictions for what is legal and what is funded in this research. As already stated in this paper, the debate does not simple end with a simple explanation. Within the two sides of this debate there are six different ethical positions that are generally recognized. One, all utilization of human embryos for research is wrong (Greely, 2013). Two, surplus in-vitro embryos can be used, but additional ones cannot be made for the purpose of scientific research (Greely, 2013).…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All great leaps in our society have first met with some moral conflict. Scientists today are facing the use of embryonic stems cells and if their use takes away a human life. It has been proven this small group of specialized cells can treat many diseases that we have battled for some time. In the case of the embryonic stem cell research, it is almost impossible to respect both moral principles of respecting the value of a human life and to prevent or alleviate suffering. These two principles are what have created the debate on embryonic stem cell research and use.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He warrants that since the embryo has not been implanted in the uterus, it is not a human being yet, therefore he justifies that there is nothing wrong with practicing on a cell that is not a human yet. He strongly backs up his warrant by using the morning after pill as an example of something that people use that is justifiable for treating a cell that is not a human yet either. The author asserts the moral views of the people that do not agree with the research, various times throughout his essay he uses morality and human rights to argue against the practice. Watts utilizes credible sources such as The National Bioethics Advisory Committee, to state their opinions on the rights of embryonic stem cells. They believe that the "blastocyst must be treated with respect appropriate to early human embryonic tissue, but is justifiable if it's used in research that aims to save or heal human life" (Watts, 460).…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a chance for life, which to me makes them have moral value. Though an embryo doesn’t have memories or life experiences or feel pain doesn’t mean it doesn’t have value or importance. Its been said that embryos don’t feel pain, but how can we know for sure. Though they may not feel physical pain or psychological pain doesn’t make it right to destroy them. Embryos can have a value to life.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From this, it is shown that embryos have the right to see the world and experience life in the future. Moreover, embryos have the right to develop into human beings, according to Insoo Hyun. Because the right to life is essential to all embryos, it can be seen that embryos should be able to experience individual freedoms that humans have. If embryos are destroyed, then embryos wouldn’t be able to experience individual freedoms that humans…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research is incredible! It’s so beneficial for our health, but the prices we have to pay for it are….not so incredible, but they aren’t horrible. Personally, I want to fund it, but I don’t cause it’s like, you’re killing things (not babies yet) and technically they’re not alive yet, but you’re saving actual people’s lives. I understand the whole religious thing, but if whoever you believe in didn’t want you didn’t want people to invent stem cell research, then why did they allow it? I’m a Christian and I believe that whatever happens is by the will of God.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lee and George’s paper “The Wrong of Abortion” details the moral wrongness of aborting embryonic beings as it is essentially justified non-intentional killing. Reasoning provided by Lee and George are faulty as it neglects to consider the consequential factors that affect child after birth, complications that arise with giving your child up for adoption and how the abortion can benefit the mother and child. Lee and George begin the paper by defining that embryos and fetuses are essentially immature but complete human being and that after complete fertilization, an individual human is formed. They argue that the baby can feel pain and that it should be considered just as any regular being because of they have their own distinction, they have…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem Cells Evaluative Essay This is a general essay for one who may or may not be going into to stem cells on the different kind of stem cells we are determining price of each of the different stem cells the ethics and its plasticity. What are stem cells? Stem Cells are an undifferentiated cell of a multicellular organism that is capable of giving rise to indefinitely more cells of the same type, and from which certain other kinds of cell arise by differentiation.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem Cells: Good Or Bad?

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Claim: Stem cell research and use is a bad idea because stem cells come can kill unborn children, stem cells also are bad because cures should not depend on the killing of an unborn child, when you use stem cells for a cure it can be unstoppable and you can die from tumours that form, and finally for the final reason is stem cells can get you hurt in many ways. According to Embryonic stem cell therapy ‘morally unacceptable’ it said “Where stem cells are harvested from the embryo and foetus-as opposed to the umbilical cord blood or placenta of the newborns or the adult-existed life has to be sacrificed.” Reasoning: This is bad because your life can be sacrificed and you can die from that. Another reason why this is bad is because you shouldn’t…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cell Research Argument

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The public’s opinion on stem cell research has drastically changed from when the controversy first got major media coverage in 2001. According to a poll posted to isidewith.com, 73 percent of Americans agree the federal government should fund stem cell research, while 27 percent think the contrary. But why has public perception taken a complete and utter turnaround from years ago? One may argue, positives of stem cells outweigh the negatives. Today, we have a better understanding of what these cells are capable of.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When looking at human life from a moral point of view, can a fetus be considered a…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays