Overall, there is divergence in the opinions of the public, researchers, and politicians in regards to the ethics of embryonic stem cell research and the responsibility of policies in setting restrictions for what is legal and what is funded in this research. As already stated in this paper, the debate does not simple end with a simple explanation. Within the two sides of this debate there are six different ethical positions that are generally recognized. One, all utilization of human embryos for research is wrong (Greely, 2013). Two, surplus in-vitro embryos can be used, but additional ones cannot be made for the purpose of scientific research (Greely, 2013). Three, in-vitro embryos, but not cloned embryos can be made only …show more content…
There are physical and psychological risks that are associated and are often overlooked. In caring for and educating these women, nurses play a vital role.
Physical risks that are associated in the process of acquisition of embryonic stem cells vary widely and have the potential to be life threatening. Ovarian stimulation is the most common way of obtaining the ova that are used and can result in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (Ellison & Meliker, 2011). This can result after utilizing hormone injections to stimulate the growth of ova in the ovaries. There are no preset doses of hormone that are used; instead, amounts of hormones used vary for every woman (Ellison & Meliker, 2011). An excess of the hormone can cause the ovaries to become painful and swollen. Complications can extend beyond the ovaries and can cause events such as heart attacks, strokes, renal failure, and potentially uterine cancer (Dondorp & De Wert, 2011). Although this is a rare disorder and only has an occurrence rate of 5 percent in women that undergo ovarian stimulation treatment, it still occurs and healthcare providers must still be prepared to care for this specific population (Ellison & Meliker, 2011). Additional complications are associated with surgical acquisition of the oocytes, …show more content…
In any setting conducting thorough and frequent assessments are necessary and can make a difference in early detection of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and other complications. Monitoring laboratory diagnostic exams can give substantial information to nurses about the physical status of these patients. Building report with the patient can give insight on psychosocial status. Establishing nursing diagnosis along with nursing outcomes/planning help to give responsible and competent care. Educating women prior and during initial stages of in-vitro fertilization can make patient privy to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and/or surgical risks. This can be achieved by providing these patients with verbal and/or written supplemental material with information on the process and the risks. This could be by recommending the patient to do additional research with physicians or consulting with other professionals about the risk. Educating the patient about her options in regard to her extra ova or embryos ahead of time can help her prepare with any ethical questions she may have. Being informed can help patients feel empowered about their health and lives, and patients can confirm this verbally. Most importantly, these implementations help patients feel safe and certain about their care and