Slaves, Women's Rights, And The Dred Scott Case

Improved Essays
America. The country of freedom and equality. That is what everybody thinks first when they think of America. But is it actually true? America is not actually the country of freedom. There are many restrictions that make people feel like they aren’t treated equally and even hundred of years ago and today. A few examples are slaves and slavery, women's’ rights, and the Dred Scott case that involved America. If America was actually free, people wouldn’t be treated differently from each other. First, slavery and slaves are huge controversial issues that went all around the country for years, debating back and forth about whether or not slavery should be stopped. Slaves were treated very harshly in the north and south. When slavery …show more content…
Women were treated very differently from men, causing in the future the Women’s Right Movement. Women could not be educated like men. And even if they were, people wouldn’t appreciate it or care about it. For example, Elizabeth Blackwell, Lucy Stone’s sister, knew mathematics, science, and history very well and was even trained by a doctor. She wanted to become a doctor herself one day, so she went to school to learn about it. However, she was unfortunately rejected twenty-nine times because she was a woman. But eventually, they accepted and she was the first woman to ever receive a medical degree. It only started in 1920 that women were being treated equally to men (History.com). This just supports the fact that women were not treated equally because if they were, they would have had just as a fair shot as anybody. But instead, they were pushed aside because they were in fact a woman. It is even still happening today that women are treated differently. Today, women still make about 16% less money than men (Megan Friedman) and it doesn’t make sense. If a man and woman are doing the same exact job, why are women getting paid …show more content…
Dred Scott was a slave that had traveled with his owner to Wisconsin, where slavery was banned by the Missouri Compromise. When Scott returned to Missouri, he went to court to try to explain to the government that he believes slaves should be set free, because when he went to Wisconsin, he had made himself a free man. The government kept going back and forth about whether or not he should be freed. This was a poor choice from America. If America kept saying that they were a free country, but they didn’t know if he should be freed, America is a biased country. Also, slaves were considered “not citizens” of the United States, proving that the country didn’t think of them as actual people. Therefore, Scott was unfortunately sent back to his owner because technically, he was property and had to be returned to his owner. This proves that America believes that people can only be free if they are white men and women. America wanted to keep slavery in the country because if they didn’t, they would allow people to be free. So, the case and the Supreme Court decision says that America didn't think African Americans were considered people. However, in the end, finally, his case was overruled and it eventually led to freedom for all

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was a important person in America and in the Supreme Court's history. He helped push America towards what's right and the Civil War. Dred Scott was born sometime in 1795 and was born into slavery. He had a brother and a father and mother. His family and him were owned by Peter Blow.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Free Soil Analysis

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Controversy was spread all over the United States due to slavery. In general the South was in favor of slavery, whereas the North was opposed to it. The North’s main argument in this controversy was “Free Soil” and that slavery hurt white men and the economy. The South, however, claimed that without slavery, it would not be able to have a stable society or economy. The North believed slavery hurt white men and must be stopped from expanding throughout the United states; the South argued that both the United States government and the British economy needed slavery in order to survive.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Ruling In the Supreme Court’s decision on Dred Scott’s many consequences brought tension surrounding the issue of slavery in the United States. “In the case, the Supreme Court rules that Scott was still a slave, and therefore, he had no right to file the suit in the United State court as he was not a citizen and did not have any legal rights” (Horton). This case may have been the one of most controversial in American history due to the fact that it deals with such a disputable topic as slavery. In this paper, I will discuss legal and cultural events from the Dred Scott v. Sandford case that may have flared the start of the Civil War.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The court decided not only to not give him his freedom but “all people of African ancestry” (PBS) was part of their decision of banning freedom even if they would have an opportunity to earn it. Many slaves at this point found themselves affected because of Dred 's case and the decision that was made by the Supreme Court. The Dred Scott Decision was a complicated case that went through so many process and to the end was not won. The case instead affected the slavery system and that would not be changed because the Supreme Court had the right to do decisions such like this. The slavery system complicated his chances of winning the case and supporting himself of obtaining citizenship.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A 7-2 majority ruled on the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford, citing a wide variety of constitutional grounds for support. One of the weakest arguments of this case was the argument for Dred Scott not being able to be classified as a citizen. As a result, he was not subject to the full right of freedoms and due process of law. Taney wrote that slaves lacked sovereignty and that they were not intended to be included by the framers of the Constitution (5). He writes that slaves were actually, “intended to be excluded from it.”…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The eleven-year struggle with the Supreme court would soon come to an end to the decision that Dred Scott would remain a slave. Dred Scott had been fighting for his and his family’s freedom from slavery. Dred Scott was born into slavery around 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia. It’s unsure if he was owned by the Blow family after birth or not. Dred Scott’s parents were also slaves.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dread Scott is making a statement about American imperialism, through the image of South Korean students burning the flag, Dread is giving us a different viewpoint of how America is viewed in different regions of the world. By giving the audience a chance to participate, to voice their opinions only through treading on a symbol of compulsory nationalistic pride (the flag), we are put in a position where we can begin to imagine the viewpoint of people from around the world whop don't hold any favorable opinion of American exceptionalism. That being said I would write in the book. Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man, involved in the Supreme court case Dred Scott vs. Stanford, in which the Supreme Court decided that African Americans…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed they were free because they had lived in free states. In the bias Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford, five out of the nine judges were from slave states. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote the pro-slavery Dred Scott decision that took ten years of litigation before a decision. The Court ruled that because Scott was not a citizen of the United States, he could not legally claim violation of his constitutional rights.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery Dbq

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Slavery was always seen in the 19th but was not very well described. Slavery has many definitions but usually is was defined as the practice of owning slaves. This was seen through 1619 to 1865 in America. Slaves were used for what the master wanted, for example many plantation owners used their slaves for cotton picking and farming . Many worked on the fields and grew up as farmers, but were not considered people.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America is the land of the free, because of the brave. Americans enjoy many freedoms because of the democracy our ancestors fought very hard to establish. Freedom summarizes what being an American is about, but it’s not what an American is. An American is someone who is brave enough to do something even though the punishment is severe, someone who sees opportunity and stops at nothing to achieve it, and someone who doesn’t take the easy way out. Bravery is part of the definition of an American.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There were a few reasons the north and the south viewed the issue of slavery so differently. The first was political differences. With the two politicians having different opinion, the debate between Lincoln and Douglas was a huge factor between north and south. Lincoln held that slavery was a moral wrong. Lincoln, himself, had slaves but he was very determined to try to free the slaves.…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Civil War could have been avoided if only Lincoln had purchased the slaves their freedom”. In my oppinion, I disagree with statement beacause It has long been argued that the civil war was triggered not only by slavery, but controversy led to the conclusion that the main problem was tariffs. I can't think of a single war or major event that had a singular cause. President Abraham Lincoln believed that the civil war was inevitable due to increasing tension between the north and the south and that this was the only way to solve the problem between the two groups.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Women In Medicine

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Women and Medicine Throughout history women have always been seen as not being equal to men. Men have been above women when it came to a point where women felt as though they should be given the right to do what they want to do and not fall into society’s norm. A big part of a breakthrough in women’s rights would have to be when women stepped u to the plate and started earning their medical degrees. Since the medical field was something men were only allowed to do besides women just staying home with their sick kids and other family members, women felt as though they wanted to be needed.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries women where cursed, beaten, and neglected just because they wanted a voice in American society. There was a time before when women were not treated equally in comparison to men. A woman 's sole purpose of living was to cook, clean, and take care of her children. Women had no right in deciding who they wanted to be and they surely had no voice in government or politics of American society. Starting in the mid nineteenth century, women began protested to show how passionate they were to vote and be in control.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays