The Dred Scott Decision: A Man Who Decided To Fight For His Freedom

Superior Essays
On March 1857 a case was opened in the U.S. Supreme Court about a man who decided to fight for his freedom. The Dred Scott Decision was named after the courageous man, Dred Scott, who valiantly defied the order of slavery to obtain what every white man had, freedom. Dred decided to fight for his freedom when his master passed away while being at the state of Illinois that was considered a free state for all. Even though the Supreme Court disagreed with him, and got involved in his case to prove that Dred couldn’t claim his freedom or U.S. citizenship. During the Dred Scott decision the U.S. Supreme court was justified that slaves could not claim U.S. citizenship, however Chief Justice Roger B supported Dred Scott. The U.S. Supreme …show more content…
The court decided not only to not give him his freedom but “all people of African ancestry” (PBS) was part of their decision of banning freedom even if they would have an opportunity to earn it. Many slaves at this point found themselves affected because of Dred 's case and the decision that was made by the Supreme Court. The Dred Scott Decision was a complicated case that went through so many process and to the end was not won. The case instead affected the slavery system and that would not be changed because the Supreme Court had the right to do decisions such like this. The slavery system complicated his chances of winning the case and supporting himself of obtaining citizenship. Dred Scott though never gave up to obtain a freedom that he was seeking for and realistically knew it was not an easy challenge to overcome. The decision made by the case caused so many chaos and tension because it was a case that threatened the union. The decision “inflamed regional tension” (Dred Scott Decision) because if Dred was to win his case other slaves would join and file a case as well. The tension created among slaves was nevertheless for either good or the bad. This case deep down was a hope in some way to others that were also part of the slavery

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sanford case, which would create another reason on why slavery needed to be abolished. This event happened before the start of the Civil War, so it gave the north leverage on why we needed a ratification of the Constitution. Dred Scott was a slave who moved to a state that allowed slavery, from a state that did not allow slavery. He believed that he deserved the right to be a free slave now, to not be forced into slavery just because he moved into a slaveholding state. Scott brought this point up to the United States Supreme Court because he wanted to see and receive justice.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hiram Revel Research Paper

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The purpose of this study is to present bibliographical information of Hiram Revels and his impact on the culture, politics, and history of the African-American experience. Hiram Revels impacted life, black churches as well as blacks and whites with opposing political views. As the first African American Senate, a person of Revels defeated stereotype that came along with the Dred Scott decision, which stated that no individual of African ancestry was or could be considered a citizen of the United States. In order to provide a preferable understanding of Hiram Revels, this research paper will also contribute biographical information. Hiram Revels was born free in Fayetteville, North Carolina.…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prior to the Civil War, relationships between the North and South had been poisoned by disputes over taxes. The North financed its industrial development through crippling taxes imposed by Congress on imported goods. The South on the other hand, had been an agricultural economy who had to buy machinery and such from abroad, ended up footing the bill. When recession hit in the 1850’s, Congress jacked the import taxes from 15% to 37%. The South threatened secession, Which outraged the North.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Dbq

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This amendment, however, addressed the original ideals that were formed in the Declaration of Independence; for example, the declaration states, “All men are created equal,” and after the Civil War, the epiphany came to light that African-Americans were also men, and they, also, should be treated equally not only as citizens, but as humans. Most citizens of color and different ethnicity were not given fair treatment in the judicial system prior to the 14th. For example, the case of Dred Scott v Sandford, was an unfair trial due to racism. Dred Scott was a slave owned by John Emerson, after he had passed his wife Eliza Irene Sanford took his estate. While under Sanford control, Dred Scott tried to buy his freedom for his family but Sanford refused.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the Supreme Court rulings such as in the Dred Scott case, the North and South fought numerous times over slavery. The North feared the many potential consequences of this case. The South was reluctant to give up slavery for various reasons. The Dred Scott v. Sandford case set precedent for other cases with similar conflicts. This case also provided reasons for the Civil War to occur between the North and South.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was a former slave whose slave’s owner moved to a free state where slavery is prohibited. When they returned to Missouri Scott sued for his freedom that he had by living in a free territory. The discussion take place during the trial was basically that a Negro slave descendants free or not were not apart of the people. Africans were inferior and had no right of a white man. They also challenged the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by stating that the situation is not warranted by the constitution.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    BOOK Wendy Leo Moore wrote, Reproducing Racism: White Space, Elite Law Schools, and Racial Inequality. The Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc. published the book in 2008. The book has 6 chapters and there are 200 pages, the book ends on page 183; the rest of the pages in the book are the Bibliography and Index. At the end of each chapter Wendy Moore puts her notes where she found all of her information.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, was a previous slave proprietor from Maryland. The United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. Court’s majority decided that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, believed that blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic,…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America's history is plagued by scores of controversies and tough decisions made by crafty lawmen. One of the greatest controversies, perhaps, is the issue of slavery, for which thousands upon thousands of men fought and died. Many opposed slavery morally, and some even economically, but everyone had their own opinions on it. The North, however, took action on slavery with laws like the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Compromise of 1850. These two acts harbor a host of moral dilemmas and make many people wonder just what the politicians who wrote them were thinking; however, these bills, along with other bills, helped to stop slavery in its tracks.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    DRED SCOTT V. SANFORD: THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS Jay Barber 25938654 HIUS-221 November 16, 2017 As seminal decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sanford brought the issues of racism and slavery to the forefront of American political culture during the nineteenth century. It has also been considered by legal and political scholars to be a “ghastly error”, the “product of an overly ideological and reactionary judge”, and a cause of the Civil War. Many abolitionists and Northerners declared the Supreme Court’s decision to be illegitimate while others demanded obedience to the Court’s decision and labeled disobedience as rebellion, treason, and unconstitutional.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays