Significance Of Kant's Theory Of Deontology In Captain America

Improved Essays
Captain America Steve Rogers was a regular, undersized, want to be soldier. Unfortunately for him, he was never big enough to qualify for military duty. This was until he was offered a chance to become a candidate for an experimental procedure that would allow him to serve his country as he had always wanted. He managed to impress enough to be picked for the procedure. After a series of painful series of injections, Steve became bigger, stronger, and faster. He then adopted the persona of Captain America, unfortunately for him he was being utilized as an actor trying to help raise funds for the war. This was until he seized upon an opportunity to become something more. He was overseas near the frontline when he learned that a large number of soldiers had been captured. There …show more content…
Immanuel Kant and his theory of deontology would argue that some of the tactics that Captain America uses are not right and he is in fact unethical. Deontology judges actions based on their adherence to the rules set in place (Kant). So when Captain America lies to people (generally to protect people), he is being unethical in the eyes of Immanuel Kant. However, one of the criticisms of Kant’s theory of Deontology is that it does not take into account situation. This means that at times when most people would deem it to be acceptable to lie, such as to protect others, or when Captain America is trying to gain a strategic advantage over an enemy, he is still being unethical in the eyes of Kant. Immanuel Kant’s argument for this is, what if everyone acted like this? If everyone lied to protect others or to gain a strategic advantage then they would eventually not be protecting people or gaining any advantage because everyone would know that the other person was lying (Kant). It is interesting that Kant would find Captain America, someone who almost everyone finds to be almost morally perfect, to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since Steve Rodgers was asleep for the past 70 years, there were a lot of events and new things that he missed out on. There are a lot of things that he would have wanted to witness, not only as a superhero/savior of America, but as an individual. He missed out on a lot of new things and events such as new technology, advanced military weapons/equipment, and world tragedies. There has been a numerous amount of technological advancements that Steve Rodgers would have wanted to catch up on, including but not limited to the PlayStation, the jetpack, and the smartphone. All three of these were great technological advancements that would have been on his catch up list.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Personal Response

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Name- MAYANK MANGAL ID No.- 2014A4PS459H Assignment: Personal Response Essay Immanuel Kant : An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment is an essay which was written by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in the year of 1784, the greatest modern philosopher of all times is deeply inspired by Rousseau from where he adopts the novelties of freedom as autonomy or itself legislation. The essay addresses the causes of lack of enlightenment and the preconditions which are necessary to make it possible to enlighten the people. Kant thinks that the people should be given freedom to use their own intellect and he abolished all church and state paternalism.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This example shows why Kantian Ethics interferes with our deeply held moral intuitions. There are times like this where lying seems absolutely necessary, however that completely goes against Kantian…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iron Man would like the attention on him for once in his life. Captain America gets all the attention and Iron Man is tired of it. Iron Man creates the reverse formula to make Captain America puny again so the fans do not like him anymore. The fans will like Iron Man and he will get all the attention. Captain America wants to get rid of Iron Man once and for all.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Overall, the main point is that lying is morally wrong. The nonconsequentialists have more leanness towards this action. They do believe there are situations in which, the truth may not always have the best outcomes. In the case of the superheroes, they are lying to keep those dear to them safe. Which in fact, they are doing for the greater good.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the world, many accidents happen concerning the military. However, are these military accidents ethical or unethical? To what extent is it ethical to take action if a team member is shooting at you in combat because they think you are the enemy? Friendly fire is “weapon fire coming from one’s own side, especially fire that causes accidental injury or death to one’s own forces” (oxforddictionaries.com). Within military combat, accidents happen where a soldier may hurt, injure, or kill another soldier on the same team because you think they are the enemy, or vise versa.…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Lying Wrong

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article by Christopher Robichaud, it mentions that “Kant maintained that our negative duty to not lie cannot be violated” (Robichaud 191). On the other hand, the nonconsequentialists believe that there are circumstances in which, “the duty not to deceive is trumped by other considerations” (Robichaud 191). For example, in this article it mentions that if Spider-Man was to tell Aunt May his secret he would cause tremendous pain. Enough pain that she can potentially die. In the view of a nonconsequentialists it would be argued that causing serious physical harm trumps deceiving.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "You've got to stand for something or you will fall for anything" (p.168, Ericsson). Sometimes we lie because it was or is for the greater good. Other times we lie was because we know something or because we…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    We now turn to examine the second aspect of Kant’s morality which is mainly advanced by Wood through the foundational model. The substantive aspect focuses on dignity in the context of rational normativity in the Kant’s moral philosophy. This means to describe what the human dignity is, we might appeal to the nature of humanity in term of rational being as an end itself in Kant’s practical philosophy, rather than humanity in its technical term. By this, it follows the nature of humanity could be presented only through human rational activity when they ought to act rationally under the demand of normative laws since humanity as a rational being related to some basic normative notions, such as; the nature of rational nature as an end in itself,…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people will say that lying is never the answer, but they don’t always tell why. Lying often ends unethically, not only the can the lier be punished or feel guilty in the process, but it often goes further than anticipated. When looking back there seems to be more consequences on the result of the pretense than what the reward would have been if everything worked out and there was no lying. The Salem Witch Trials, the McCarthy Trials, and the McMartin Trials all proved that it is important to always be honest, regardless of the sacrifice.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People lie frequently, hence why it is such a moral dilemma. If people were able to identify more hidden agendas and different types of white lies, it would be less of a conundrum. Many people are unaware that we as people make mistakes on a daily basis. Many individuals choose to see the good, whereas some would like to exploit the good in people and use that to their own advantage.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays