Immanuel Kant And Deontological Ethics Essay

Improved Essays
In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the …show more content…
The defining feature of deontological ethics is that it decides whether an action is moral or immoral without considering anything else. For example, Kant argues that lying is never under any circumstances acceptable, no matter what the situation, as we cannot will for lying to be a universal maxim. Whereas the consequentialist view is of the opposite opinion that it is our consequences that hold moral value, not our actions. Concequentialists believe in the theory of “the greater good” and therefore aim to make the most people the most happy they can in society, Because of this, they take the view that telling a lie in some instances is acceptable if it goes on to produce good consequences later on. This seems like an ideal theory if we could actually pre determine the outcome of our actions, but we have little or no control in the real world over how our actions turn out. Kantians argue that although we don't have control over the outcome of our actions, or the effect they will have, the only thing we do possess full control over is our motives behind the action. Thus our free will can only decide on our motives, meaning morality that is focused on the consequences of a situation is not concerned with autonomy of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s critique of consequentialism comes from his principle of morality, more specifically the categorical imperative, and how it is immoral to use an individual as merely as a means to an ends and not be treated as ends in themselves. This theory is in distinct contrast with the principles of consequentialism because the theory is based on the fact that the consequences of a conduct determines whether the conduct is right or wrong. The individual would thus be a slave of utility maximization because their actions would solely be based off of reaping the best possible results. Therefore, meaning that consequentialism does not take into account the morally relevant difference between acts and omissions because consequentialism ignores moral…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We are free to act in way’s that are moral or immoral because according to this theory, our intentions are more meaningful than the outcome. Kant explains that, “A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes-because of its fitness for attaining some proposed end: it is good through its willing along- that is good in itself (pg. 110). ” If we make the conscience effort to do good, we are inherently good. If our objectives are to cause harm, we are inherently bad. If we intend to do good but the outcome does not work in our favour, we are still seen as good since…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is here that Kant’s rationale for making choices, as well as morality, can be…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant created Kantian ethics, an example of deontological moral theory which places focus on the morality of the action itself, rather than the morality of the consequences of the actions, or the morality of the person who committed the actions. Kant believed in the existence of an inherent good will within humans that would lead them to make moral and just decisions. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, on the other hand, completely rejects the idea of an inherent goodness and instead places focus on the idea that humans have a natural instinct to survive and be victorious and that the victors of social, economic, and political battles would determine what is good and bad. Nietzsche 's criticism of Kant centers on its acceptance of duty as…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant expresses his theory by stating “humans are by nature free” (CCCB, 15). He believes that we all have a duty or obligation to do something and that we have the freedom to do it. He believes that “what we ought to do, we can do” (CCCB.15), therefore, we act on our own free will, and are therefore, free. While freedom cannot be proven through empirical reasoning, Kant argues through practical certainty that humans are free. For example, if individuals “ought” to choose ethical actions based on obligation and duty they must therefore, be free to do so.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An Act Ethically Right

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All human beings have free will to make decision but more importantly, everyone have good will. For Kant, good will has “whole value in itself” and “ its usefulness or fruitlessness can neither add to nor take away anything from this value”. Likewise, most individual would act to get something good out of it. However, the moral value of an act cannot rest on the consequences because a will is only good when it is good in itself and not what it accomplishes. Therefore, it is essential for Kant that one’s intention and reason play factors in determining whether an act is ethically right because one must act of duty for duty’s sake.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian Morality is concerned with one thing, personal motives. This idea can help explain Kant’s view of morality. His ideology is unlike anything I have studied yet. It is not as simple as the utilitarian’s trolley car. It is also much more complex then the libertarian idea of morality.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant strongly believed that humans each have moral freedom. “Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) argued that moral requirements are based on a standard of rationality he dubbed the ‘Categorical Imperative’ (CI)” (Johnson). Moreover, Kant divides ethics into…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life is difficult. It holds many moments of uncertainty instead of clarity. The field of dental hygiene is no exception to life’s uncertainty. There will be times when you have to figure out if you can actually treat a patient of not, or if you can treat the patient, what course of action will you take to treat them. Is it better to pull the tooth, or is it better to do a root canal?…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant explains that developing a “metaphysics of morals” help us gain a clear understanding of moral principles to align them with our moral duties. Kant argues moral principles are not based on factors such as circumstances, needs, and desires; they derive from a priori concepts. He makes the claims that actions are considered moral if they are performed without underlying motives, not on the basis of consequences, and not based out of mere duty. Kant is not a consequentialist and thinks intentions behind an action determines if it is good or bad. This is interrelated with the concept of good will.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays