Should People Agree With Landers's Advice To Their Parents?

There is no conflict of being agree with Landers’s advices since all people owe something to somebody. Possibly, in a third letter might have answered differently because a letter talks about a husband who spends at least five hours for his parents in order to take them to supermarket, the dentist, the doctor and so on. As it goes, it’s his role of being a good son since his parents are the people who brought him to this world. If he doesn’t want to be regretful in a future for not spending time with his parents, now he better spends more time with them as much as he can. Be a friend of children is a good way of knowing and controlling because of kids whose parents are restrict they tend to get involved in bad things such as choosing wrong companions, smoking and drinking. Feasibly, talk to a kid and give him or her chance to know how it influences having a bad companion that isn’t …show more content…
Mostly, parents don’t really expect something from their kids. If they do, it’s possibly a little respect because everybody loves to get attention and respect from others. Recently noticed that if kids listen their parents carefully even if they are adults, their parents are satisfied with respectful respond of listening. When parents are too old to take care of themselves, it’s their children’s duty to help them out and paying back the owe as well. If someone had children, he or she would expect happiness, health and good academic results in children. Once children are doing good in their lives, parents are happy to see them. Parents are not a bondsman because people owe something only to a bondsman, and they are the people who brought him or her to this world. Also, until now they have done everything for their kid. Consequently, if kids understand a value of having parents and being parents, without telling they would know what it feels like to parents and would understand the