Shane Dawson And The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Essay

766 Words 4 Pages
In the book, it stated that Shane Dawson is a male homosexual, worked for a company called Entek International. During his work as an employee for the company, he received judgmental comments in regards to his sexual orientation by his co-workers, which actions were improper in work environment. For this reason, Dawson works became deteriorated. His work results became worse as the comments became more and more intense. This might happen because he did not have anyone to support him mentally. Felt that he deserved a better workforce than this, he later on filed a complaint with Entek’s human resources department. However, he was fired two days afterwards. State law made it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an individual based on sexual orientation.
Dawson’s case is one of the cases that could be link to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It states that the act curbed discrimination based but not according to sex, color, and race. Since Dawson categorized himself as a homosexual, he deserved to be protected by this act. He has the right to do what ever is necessary for him, if he feels that he is being discriminated. Therefore, to answer the question whether Dawson could establish a claim for retaliation or not, he definitely could establish a claim for retaliation. The reason that he could is because in a retaliation claim, a plaintiff, and in this case Dawson, is required to prove that he suffer damages because of making a charge, affirming, or…

Related Documents