Self-efficacy is found that during the treatment of phobic, patients’ interpretations are not objective. As Zimmerman (2001) claims that even though patients are afraid to touch particular items, but they will not get injured during the close interactions with them. There are no injures, so what they are afraid of is their own thoughts rather than items in the reality. They have wrong assumptions that these things will hurt them due to prior experience or other reasons. As a result, they do not believe themselves even though they have the ability to interact with these items. According to Zimmerman (2001), Bandura defines that self-efficacy is the ability to believe oneself for a certain activity.
It is whether their assumption is positive …show more content…
Self-concept is the overall perception of oneself, while self-efficacy is the belief of a particular task. What is more, outcome expectation is the consequent value of the activity, while self-efficacy is the belief of one’s ability to achieve the activity. Furthermore, perceived control is whether one’s performance due to external factors or internal factors, while self-efficacy is whether the person believe he or she meets all the requirements in order to perform successfully. Though these close concepts are also determinants of the outcome, self-efficacy is the most predictable factor of …show more content…
The reason is that self-efficacy is measured by more specific behaviors than self-concept does. Furthermore, Zimmerman’s (2001) statistic shows that self-efficacy is more predictable for academic performance than outcome expectancies. What is more, according to Zimmerman that Bandura considers those who have internal control would cause anxiety in activities with a limited time. Self-efficacy has a stronger positive relationship with performance than its close concepts, because self-efficacious students tend to, with more efforts putting, harder tasks choices, self-regulation, lower level of stress, and stronger persistence.
As Zimmerman (2001) states, those who with higher self-efficacy would put more efforts. However, if the ability will be acquired in the future, a self-efficacious person might work harder and prepare more readily before class than those who have lower self-efficacy. For a reason, they believe their ability to acquire the ability successfully than others with lower
It is whether their assumption is positive …show more content…
Self-concept is the overall perception of oneself, while self-efficacy is the belief of a particular task. What is more, outcome expectation is the consequent value of the activity, while self-efficacy is the belief of one’s ability to achieve the activity. Furthermore, perceived control is whether one’s performance due to external factors or internal factors, while self-efficacy is whether the person believe he or she meets all the requirements in order to perform successfully. Though these close concepts are also determinants of the outcome, self-efficacy is the most predictable factor of …show more content…
The reason is that self-efficacy is measured by more specific behaviors than self-concept does. Furthermore, Zimmerman’s (2001) statistic shows that self-efficacy is more predictable for academic performance than outcome expectancies. What is more, according to Zimmerman that Bandura considers those who have internal control would cause anxiety in activities with a limited time. Self-efficacy has a stronger positive relationship with performance than its close concepts, because self-efficacious students tend to, with more efforts putting, harder tasks choices, self-regulation, lower level of stress, and stronger persistence.
As Zimmerman (2001) states, those who with higher self-efficacy would put more efforts. However, if the ability will be acquired in the future, a self-efficacious person might work harder and prepare more readily before class than those who have lower self-efficacy. For a reason, they believe their ability to acquire the ability successfully than others with lower