Richard's Response To The Ransom Of The King Of England

Improved Essays
Some people may agree with this statement because of Richard’s ransom. The ransom showed how careless Richard was as king because of his failed attempts to disguise himself as a pilgrim. He had too much confidence in himself and wasn’t very self-aware, so thought that he would be able to get along by vaguely disguising himself but not really putting in enough effort so that it was almost certain that he wouldn’t get captured. His capture put England in a perilous situation concerning money, because of the ransom needed for his release. The amount was so high that it had taken 6 months for the people of England to raise enough money for him to be released. The tactics used to get the money were quite a few taxes on income and movables, on the …show more content…
He was very involved with his land in France and was very focused on his rivalry with Prince Philip, as he wanted as much land in France as possible, even more than the actual king of France did. Although some may say that Richard was fighting for England and was fighting crusades for the church so he could be seen as pious. However, in his ten-year reign, only 6 months of it was spent in England. It did seem as if as soon as Richard returned home, he wanted to leave again. This showed that he did not really care about England or the way things were run because he left governing in the hands of anyone he could at the time, and did not make many decisions on how England was going to be run. He did not have a real commitment to being king of England and did not seem to care what was going on or who was taking care of things, as he barely made any changes or developments. He actually decreased its development, because he demanded so many taxes for his battles, crusades, and eventually his ransom, that there wasn’t much money left for John when he became king to take care of things. Therefore, because he was not very involved in England, it shows him as a failure of a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Patrick Henry, famed for giving his well known speech “Give me liberty ,or give me death!” in 1775, proposed the suggestion in his speech that the thirteen colonies ,and great britain go to war in the Second Virginia Convention at St. John's Church in Richmond. Henry was able to accomplish to sway the individuals in the second convention meeting to his favor with his impassioned plea urging the Old Dominion to form militias to defend itself against the British with war. However, while many individuals in the revolutionary era strongly perceive that attending war was the ultimate ,and only option, they are indeed misguided. Therefore, there is a deathless much simpler solution than war, which is to offer to lower the taxes rates to colonists;…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Magna Carta 1. It was commonly held that king John was the worst king of medieval England, there were several reasons for this. He had imprisoned his former wife, starved his opponents and allegedly murdered his nephew. On top of that he had imposed heavy taxes on his barons. 2.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The British did many things that angered the colonists and led them to declare war. Although the colonists had started to grow apart from England, most still considered themselves loyal to the King of England. To make sure he was still profiting off the colonies, the King imposed a series of heavy taxes on various items that were essential to living. To make matters worse, the King kept adding more and more taxes to the point where some colonists could not afford the cost of living. This added fuel to the increasing tensions between the colonists and the King.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first, it may seem like Richard is simply power-hungry and envious of his older brother, the King at that time, and his reign over the kingdom. Richard longs for that position at the top of the ladder, but he knows…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King George III Blame

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On July 4, 1776, the United States of America declared independence from Britain with the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence was written by Thomas Jefferson and the colonist blame for all the ills listed in the Declaration of Independence is King George III. “This was a the language in which the Declaration of Indepence blamed George II for the American Revolution” (O’shaugnessy, pg. 1) I believe the colonies needed someone to blame for what was going on in their cities/states in America, so why not blame King George III because he is the king of the country who is making all these taxes on the colonies. In fact, Parliament was the one who stated to make acts/laws on taxing certain items.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As times change, values and ideas often change as they are invariably shaped by their context. However, some remain constant throughout time and are universal. The 1592 Shakespearean drama Richard III and Al Pacino 's 1995 docu-drama Looking for Richard [LFR] were written four hundred years apart yet both texts address perpetual values and ideas that are common to both eras. Through a simultaneous study of both texts, the responder is able to understand the influence of context on aspects of the human condition such as the adverse effects of lust for power and appearance and reality. Richard III is heavily influenced by Elizabethan principles and in Pacino 's response to the increasingly secular and modern American context he effectively refashions…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So when King Richard spurred his horse and galloped toward the broken line, calling out to his soldiers to turn back to the battle and fight. He was barely halfway across the field when the unsecured horse's shoe flew off. The horse stumbled and fell, and King Richard was thrown to the ground in front of the enemy. King Richard looked around him and saw that his soldiers were turning and running and the enemy's troops were closing in to him. His army had fallen to pieces, his troops were busy trying to save themselves and in a moment the battle was over.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Values In King Richard III

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    His frustration towards his fated identity causes a rejection of his self-restraint, in turn, emphasises the paradox in his “[determination] to prove a villain”. In the conclusion of the War or Roses, Richard’s lost identity as a warrior perpetuates his challenge to God and pursuit of power, challenging the Divine Right of Kings. Comparatively the social ideal of the Great American Dream cause Pacino to reshape the perceptions towards Richard due to a shift in the values of aspiration. The increased complexity in Richard’s character in Looking for Richard is representative of modern society’s villains possessing inner conflict as illustrated in the high angle mid shot of Richard holding Edward in the Cloisters in the opening soliloquy. The turmoil Richard possess in his contemplation of Edward’s incoming death evokes sympathy within the audience as Richard has demonstrated human characteristics of conflict and thus restraint, however this is discarded as his desire for power increases.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry VII Failures

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the beginning the gentry heavily favoured by Richard posed a serious threat of rebellion, many of which were either Yorkists or supporters, and though his marriage to Elizabeth did stem some of the hostility the north still heaved with overly powerful lords loyal to Richard. A visit was arranged to display Henry’s power and standing, and despite being attacked he succeeded in this assertion. Closer to home Henry faced a number of Richard’s supporters on the council. He made the decision to remove those closes to Richard while keeping enough of the original council to retain a stable and balanced government. These moves both assured his station as a king that wasn’t afraid to act against opposition, both physically and politically, and was unafraid to make changes to assure things worked smoothly for him.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is King John Bad

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Also, he arranged the murder of his nephew. He was a perpetual liar. He lied to get his way, no matter the consequences. King John also believed that since he was King, he could get anything he wanted. Because of this, he is more commonly known as the worst king in English history.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Edward IV died on April 9, 1483, England was nearing the end of the tediously long conflict known as the Wars of the Roses. England needed a period of peace and stable government, but it was not going to get it. Edward had two children, Edward, aged 12, and Richard, aged 9. Given the youth of the heir to the throne, regency would be needed. The two most obvious people to head that regency were Queen Elizabeth and Richard of Gloucester.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries a question has been swirling around in many people’s heads, what happened to the princes in the tower? Many theories have been created over the years with suspects ranging from natural death of the sickly prince Edward to murder by a member of their own court. The most widely believed theory is that their own uncle Richard the Duke of Gloucester, later to become Richard the III, had them murdered on his orders to ensure his position as king of England. Many people believe this theory because it has so much evidence to back it up ranging from Richard’s possible motives for killing the princes, the timeline of which the princes were in the Tower of London, and the fact that it was widely known that he killed them during the time of his reign.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard III Villain

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He was motivated by his need for control; he manipulated people and murdered his way onto the throne. I believe that there are two Richards, a Machiavellian monster formed by Shakespeare; and Richard III; the historical figure who many historians have claimed is an innocent…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard III Film Analysis

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Richard III the film is a historical movie which depicts the rivalry between the houses of York and Lancaster .The film begins with a dramatic opening scene which connects the past with the present. In the film Richard is at the center of all the action as the film depicts his ascend to the throne through the use of manipulation of other characters praying on their weaknesses, murderous tactics and seducing women who may be presented as weak. Among the victims of his murders are his brother Clarence, his nephews, his wife Anne, Rivers and Buckingham. The film captures all the major scenes of the original play.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the opening Act of Richard the III, Shakespeare introduces the protagonist, Richard, with a soliloquy, revealing a brilliant and witty mind within a deformed body. The house of York, as described, has taken power and Edward “this son of York” has been crowned king. In lines 1-41 of Act 1, Scene 1, Richard reflects on how these events affect him. He begins the plots and descriptions that will fool successive characters (like his brothers). Shakespeare uses soliloquies as a mode of expressing the real thoughts of a character.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays