Henry VII Failures

Improved Essays
How successfully did Henry VII deal with the problems he faced during his reign?
The success of Henry VII is clearly seen throughout is reign in the number of defining, long-lasting but generally political un-taxing decisions he made. Several of these contributed to the longevity of the Tudor dynasty and worked to bring stability and balance to England in the years succeeding the Wars of the Roses. While there were a number of failures during reign, none of them were particularly devastating and were all generally short-term issues.
Key successes in Henry’s political moves included arranged marriages that forged connections and alliances. The first he made was between him and Elizabeth of York, the heiress to the York line. This served as a
…show more content…
At the beginning the gentry heavily favoured by Richard posed a serious threat of rebellion, many of which were either Yorkists or supporters, and though his marriage to Elizabeth did stem some of the hostility the north still heaved with overly powerful lords loyal to Richard. A visit was arranged to display Henry’s power and standing, and despite being attacked he succeeded in this assertion. Closer to home Henry faced a number of Richard’s supporters on the council. He made the decision to remove those closes to Richard while keeping enough of the original council to retain a stable and balanced government. These moves both assured his station as a king that wasn’t afraid to act against opposition, both physically and politically, and was unafraid to make changes to assure things worked smoothly for him. It was a way to protect his status, similar to his narrow focus on gathering …show more content…
While his methods weren’t very innovative the way he recreated and tweaked older systems used by kings before him created an arrangement of policies and laws that brought multiple form of revenue into the king’s coffers while simultaneously working to distance and control the nobility. One such method was the Crown Lands Act of 1851: after a line died out due to lack of male heirs the lands were retained by the king, and later rented for profit. The numbers of noble families decreased over his reign as his monetary yield increased. Feudal Dues placed a law upon landowners that required them to give military service in aid of the king, keeping nobility below him as well as making sure they couldn’t grow overly strong when it came to building personal armies. It came to a point where 46 of the 62 noble families were in financial debt to the king during his reign. The king’s personal revenue and security steadily increased while his dependency on parliament and the nobility decreased, allowing him more freedom and to keep the aristocracy under control. The decrease in his popularity due to his miserly ways seems a small price to pay for the success he had in this field, however it did lead to some further issues with the discontented

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    King Louis XVI - The Awful Leader King Louis XVI, born August 23, 1754, was the last King of France and he wasn't a particularly strong leader. Although he’s one of the most famous monarchs in the 18th century who went down in history, he miserably failed at his job. The kings before him, Louis XIV and Louis XV, put the country in debt and the unemployment dropped to 50%. He was a beloved king at the beginning of his reign, but as he made more decisions he slowly became a despised king. His people stormed the Bastille to show a defiance towards him, his family got charged with treason, and he was guillotined by his people on January 21, 1793.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Louis XIV Successful? The Great Louis XIV reigned as a successful king in France from 1643 through 1715. Louis was considered the embodiment of an “absolute” monarch, because of his need for sole power and ruling. As Louis started his reign, many things needed to be changed, from being a disconnected age, to a integrate procedure. He commenced this process by taking full power over France and converting to only one religion.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry did not self-indulge in financial or any matters, he stated what he wanted and relied on other people; Henry VIII was practically the opposite of his father, Henry VII. Henry also spent his wealth, he enjoyed grand feasts and owning luxurious items; he had the true image of a King. This could have led to his and England’s weakness, as the French and Habsburgs monarchies were great in size and wealth, and England couldn’t even compete with them, it was too weak. Another aspect was that Henry didn’t and couldn’t have a lot of victories, this was due to England being poor.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A similar problem is seen in the reformation of the justice system, although his ideas looked great on paper he did not take into consideration that moving all the courses to the great court houses and making courts available for the less fortunate would flood those institutions with cases and soon overload them. He might have been able to make his system more successful if he had been able to adjust the capacity of the court houses accordingly, but did no such thing condeming his idea to fail. The attempt to stop enclosures, although a great idea, was shortlived due to him not seeing how beneficial it might have become in the future and abandoned it too quickly for a problem that was more short lived. The only real success he had was in the hinderence of people abusing the benefit of the clergy and it was not his idea but something that had been initiated by Henry VII. In conclusion although he had great ideas and did lead England through some revolutionary changes, he was ultimately not very successful in his service to Henry VIII as most of his changes were…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Better to die fighting for freedom then be a prisoner all the days of your life.” (Bob Marley) Whether on the eve of a revolution, being oppressed by a slave master, or marching in the streets protesting, humans have always craved freedom. In the “Speech to the Virginia Convention” by Patrick Henry, he states it as bluntly as he can “Give me Liberty, or give me death.” When he gave this notable speech it answered the Americans’ natural desire for independence and his words still apply today.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The foreign policy of Henry VIII failed to achieve its objectives in the years 1509 to 1547’ During these years, Henry VIII was the monarch on the throne and his foreign policy was at very important to him. Throughout his reign, the objectives of his foreign policy changed but it was mainly focused on proving himself to his subjects. In this essay, I will be arguing for and against the statement, nonetheless, I do agree that Henry VIII failed to achieve the objectives he set in his foreign policy. Whilst his father dealt used diplomacy with other countries, Henry VIII preferred going into battle, which also helped achieve another objective of his; to be a warrior king.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How does Shakespeare use symmetry, in which scenes or even people seem to be slightly altered reflecting the other scenes or people in order to make his point? In addition to the political quarrels, William Shakespeare has depicted several comparisons between characters and settings to mirror situations in Henry IV. King Henry has juxtaposed Hal and Hotspur, Hal enjoys diversions and humour whereas Hotspur is exhibited in a serious manner. Contrasted again, Hotspur is the epitome of honour contracting to Falstaff who believes honour is nothing.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What was the most significant threat to Henry VII's reign? Some people argue that the De la Poles were the most significant threat to the throne and whilst they surely had the most potential I disagree with that claim. The brothers had three times the chance to make a claim to the throne, as all of them had an equal claim to it through their maternal heritage. Albeit they did not use it to their advantage or were unable to use it. John wasted his claim by supporting another, which would have given him a high political position of his own if he has succeeded and put another York in power but would not have gotten him the crown.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through his many battles and friendly alliances, he was able to do just that. He “refused to back away from a war already in progress or to leave a job undone, until he had by sheer determination and persistance completely achieved the goal he had set for himself” (138). When it came to a war against the Lombards, King Charles “did not stop until he had, by means of a long siege, worn King Desiderius down and had accepted his complete surrender” (138). Even when a war became unbelievably difficult against worthy rivals, “the king’s greatness [of spirit] and steadfast determination—both in bad times and good—could not be conquered by their fickleness or worn down by the task he had set himself” (139). “These were the wars that that mighty king waged with great skill and success in many lands over the forty-seven years he reigned.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Voluptuary Essay

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Others will say that they were financially responsible able to plan ahead before they threw it all on the table. Some will say that it was because they were humble or servant minded putting the good of their people before others. If someone were to think about these qualities of a good king they would see that the Prince of Wales depicted in John Gillary’s painting “The Voluptuary” it is obvious that the Prince would not make a good king. A wise and discerning king is one who will be able to make the hard choices that profit the good of the kingdom. Looking at the picture of the “The Voluptuary” by John Gillary it’s obvious that the depicted…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Penn Thesis

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For the deeply religious communities around Bentheim, this change in power in the late 1600's meant the could loose their soul. Losing ones life on the treacherous cross Atlantic journey to America paled comparison to loosing ones soul. All circumstances led Henry to find a solution. He sought out the teachings of his church and the news of the day.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter the Great vs. Louis XIV There has yet to be a king in history that is without fault, that has no failures. In the early 1600’s to the late 1600’s two kings arose, one from Russia and one from France. Peter the Great was from Russia, while Louis XIV was from France. While both of these rulers had obstacles, they both climbed over them and managed to get back on their feet and they made their rule historical. Both Peter the Great and Louis XIV had many goals that they wanted to achieve, they both had many accomplishments and they both had many failures.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you know who King Louis XIV is? Well King Louis XIV is the Sun King and is the longest reigning monarch in European history. King Louis XIV left a permanent mark on France’s economy and destiny. King Louis XIV was not just a king, but a leader, he built France’s to its highest point in that time. Louis did this using many tactical policies and strategies.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He centralized the monarchy’s power around him and nobody had any political influence. He easily handled the difficulties he faced from the nobles by pacifying the nobility. King Louis XIV of France was undoubtedly the best absolute monarch…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The king and Hal’s relationship is extremely flawed, especially in the beginning. King Henry shows his disapproval in a way that severely alienates Hal, and in turn, Hal starts avoiding his father. This results in him spending more time with those the king regards as deplorables. He clearly displays his fury at their familiarity with his son here: “Such barren pleasures, rude society / As thou art matched withal, and grafted to, / Accompany the greatness of thy blood, / And hold their level with thy princely heart?”(3.2.14–17). This basically encompasses his grievances with Hal’s friendship with Falstaff and those at the bar.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays