Who Is To Blame The Princes In The Tower?

Improved Essays
For centuries a question has been swirling around in many people’s heads, what happened to the princes in the tower? Many theories have been created over the years with suspects ranging from natural death of the sickly prince Edward to murder by a member of their own court. The most widely believed theory is that their own uncle Richard the Duke of Gloucester, later to become Richard the III, had them murdered on his orders to ensure his position as king of England. Many people believe this theory because it has so much evidence to back it up ranging from Richard’s possible motives for killing the princes, the timeline of which the princes were in the Tower of London, and the fact that it was widely known that he killed them during the time of his reign.
By taking a look at Richard’s possible motives for having his young nephews exterminated we can begin to uncover a few reasons it would be in his best interest to rid them from his life. Although both of the boys were declared to be illegitimate children and therefor unfit to be heirs to the throne resulting Richard to become rightful
…show more content…
After Richard the II rose to power, he still kept his nephews under his protection for months. The two princes were seen playing in the garden as referred to by Great Chronicle of London stating “During this mayor’s year. The Children of King Edward were seen shooting and playing in the garden of the Tower sundry times.” However shortly after , the two princes disappear and were never seen again. One account by Robert Ricart, recorder of Bristol, stated “…in this year the two sons of King Edward were put to silence in the Tower of London.”, followed by the date 15th September 1483. During this time, Henry Tudor wasn’t even in England let alone have access to the two boys in the Tower of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Richard Jr Book Report

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once upon a time, in a dark kingdom, there was a raging brutal war. The king of the old kingdom named Postfallia, sent for his son. When his son Richard J. Williams 14th walked into the room, their eyes met, and Richard Jr. instantly knew by his father's gaze, that he would soon be the recipient of bad news. Richard Sr. sat his son down and told him that with the death of his dearest general in the line of duty, he must call upon his son to take up arms and lead the kings army. The following weeks Richard Jr. spent all of his time training, and learning the tactics of battle, as well as the makings of great leaders.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mistress Shore is one of the most important characters in Shakespeare 's play Richard III, even though she doesn’t show up at all in the play. Without Mistress Shore, much of the play up unto this point would not develop the way it is with her, in fact without her as a plot device, there would be no Richard III because she is what allows for the jailing and death of Hastings, as well as the incrimination of the queen later on in the play and even the development of Richard as a character he is. Shore is a prime example of a character having a major presence and influence on a story, promoting both primary themes, and as a plot device moving the story forward. Mistress shore is one of the most instrumental of all to Shakespeare with his development…

    • 1364 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Romeo and Juliet we see the death of many characters, two of which are the lovers Romeo and Juliet. Along with some of their family members and close friends who die during the play as well, and during all this the question must be asked, Who is to blame? There are three people that could be considered the reasons of why so many people died. The three most worthy of blame would have to be: Romeo, Juliet, and Friar Lawrence they are to blame for the deaths of many. ("DBQ: Romeo and Juliet: Who's to Blame".…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard III Hero's Journey

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “His deputy anointed in His sight, / Hath caused his death, the which if wrongfully, / Let heaven revenge, for I may never lift / An angry arm against his minister.” (1.2.38-41). This is the first concrete example of King Richard’s loss of power.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power is like a knife. A knife in proper hands can create pieces of culinary art, however, a knife in cruel hands only creates destruction. Power is misused in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and William Shakespeare’s Richard III and both literary works demonstrate the same consequences. Power destroys morality within the abuser and society. This exploitation of power will also lead to discontentment among the people.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The corruption of power prevails across time periods, as initiated by Shakespeare and confirmed by Pacino in Looking for Richard. Undoubtedly, the battle for authority overrules the natural order of a human being, hence the consequent result of destruction and loss. In Richard III, Shakespeare thoroughly examines the nature of power and authority, utilising Richard’s brutal actions to demonstrate that the ends do not justify the means. In the Elizabethan theocracy, power was conferred through hereditary, not merit, hence Richard as a clearly unworthy and unwanted heir to the throne. In granting Richard the opportunity to cement his ‘power’, Shakespeare depicts the protagonist exerting the Machiavellian influence, as seen seducing the young Princes in Act 3, Scene 3, “God keep you from such false friends”, and “Your grace attended to thy sugared words.”…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Symonds was the first to grasp at this opportunity and made a plan to pass the boy of as Richard, son of Edward IV. This would ensure Simnel would get the support he needed to take over the throne as many would rally behind a prince from the tower. Not only was Symonds banking on the support of the Woodvilles, for example the mother of Richard the Queen Dowager Elizabeth Woodville, but also the Queen consort, Elizabeth of York who was Richard's sister and Margaret of Burgundy, sister of Edward IV and Richard III. This claim was a strong threat to his reign as his claim to the throne was shaky and only through his mothers heritage from several generations ago- On the other hand Richard had a direct paternal link to the throne, a much…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, have you ever wondered who was more to blame for Macbeth’s downfall, Macbeth, or Lady Macbeth? In my opinion, Macbeth was more to blame for his downfall. One reason that Macbeth was more to blame for his downfall than his wife was that he was so power-hungry, that he took the Three Witches' prophecies to heart and went along with his wife's plan to kill Duncan so he could become King of Scotland. Another reason that Macbeth was more to blame for his downfall than his wife was that he planned to kill Banquo and his son because the Three Witches prophesied that Banquo's kids would become king.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In lines 43-74 of the Shakespearean play Richard III, as Clarence has awakened from a horrible dream, he recalls the traumatic events that had passed by his eyes in a flash. Clarence shares his experience with the keeper of the Tower and vividly describes what he had gone through. Clarence gives the readers a clear vision of what happens after he dies. During his dream, his conscience kicks in by showing him the agony and acrimony of the people whose death he was responsible for in the battle of getting the power of the throne that he has recently won. Through his dream, Clarence is given an opportunity to see all the mistakes and betrayals he has made.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Tudor Personality

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On October 12 1537 Jane gave birth to Henry’s longest desired of a son named Edward, because she was really close to her new stepmother she didn’t have any hatred towards her. 12 days later, Jane had died, Henry lost his wife, Edward lost his mother, and Mary lost someone who was dearly close to her now. Her half bother was now heir to the throne after her father, but there was conflict outside the kingdom with religious faith. Her father married again and again. In his will Edward would take over the throne, then it would be Mary next in line, and Elizabeth third.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Richards doing in having his mother freed and how his crowning as new king. As well as his relationship with his people and power towards the kingdom. Richards method for ruling was very much different from his parents but got many of the same results. With his mother beside him she had some type of influence on him. while being king of England he had some changes made to the kingdom.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard III's Villainy

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Every hero needs a first-rate, old-fashion villain. In fact, the greater or more powerful the hero, the more despicable must be the villain, for the sweetness of victory lies in its difficulty. The question must then be asked: Can villainous victories taste as sweet? Could an audience of normal, decent human beings really find it in themselves to take joy in the victory of, say, a manipulative, power-hungry murderer? In his play Richard III, Shakespeare puts this idea to the test, not only by creating a villain so despicably brilliant that even the audience gets swept along in the mastery of his evil-doing, but also in giving him the voice closest to that of “Narrator” within his tale.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Third Crusades

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Third Crusade was recognized as one of the most belligerent, unsettled disputes in the books of history. This religious movement transpired in the Middle East, when the Muslims reclaimed the Holy Land, compelling the Christians to fight back. Not many good things happened in this movement, since many people had died from fighting each other. King Richard I was known as the chief leader of the Christians, while Saladin was perceived as the sultan of the Muslim people. These men were known as some of the best Medieval leaders of their time, instigating both of their names to be mentioned repeatedly in the history of the Crusades for centuries to come.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, Henry IV’s main father-son bond: Hal and his father King Henry IV. These two have an extremely tenuous link in the beginning of…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Richard II’s Underserved Loyalty by the Commoners Wat Tyler’s Rebellion was written after 1381 by an anonymous author to persuade the readers that King Richard II did not deserve the loyalty and devotion put forth by the commons. The author provides the reader with a chronicle of the peasant’s revolt in which he presents the commons’ reasons for revolting and how the King reacts to each interaction with the commons. The peasants are portrayed as justified in their actions, while the King is portrayed as a leader with no preference towards helping the peasants.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays