Butus And Antony's Speech: Battle Of The Speeches

Improved Essays
Battle of the Speeches According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective. While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe. While …show more content…
Antony uses parallel structure to show how close he was to Caesar. “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral. He was my friend, faithful, and just to me….”(III,ii,81-82). Antony is showing the people that he loved Caesar, a claim that supports everything he is about to say. Antony loves Caesar, and is willing to do anything to avenge his death. Antony makes the people remember all that Caesar has done for them, and slowly manipulates them with his words. “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men”(III,ii,139). Again Antony uses parallel structure to sway the crowd. He tells them that he can’t read the will because they are men and would become enraged, then tells them that they are his heirs. Antony understands that in order to go up against the conspirators, he needs the people and can only get them, by manipulating their emotions to discredit Brutus. Brutus utilizes parallel structure in his speech as well. “Good countrymen, let me depart alone, And, for my sake, stay here with Antony. Do grace to Caesar’s corpse, and grace his speech…”(III,ii,50-52). Here Brutus is convincing the people to listen to Antony talk about Caesar for his funeral. This is a costly mistake because Brutus just convinced the crowd that his actions were justified and that he killed Caesar for the greater good. The people now dislike Caesar and are …show more content…
Brutus respected Caesar and repeatedly says how he loved Caesar and how great he was. He has to use this repetition because the crowd is still unsure of Brutus. “...say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”(III,ii,18). He goes on to say yet again how much he loved Caesar. “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”(III,I,20). Brutus has to go slow with explaining the reasoning, because the people are angry and confused at why this hero they all love, killed the great Caesar. Antony’s use of repetition is along the same lines as Brutus’ but he is directing his compliments at Brutus. “(For Brutus is an honorable man; So are they all, all honorable men)”(III,ii,79-80). He ends most of his statements with calling Brutus honorable and good. “But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man”(III,ii,83-84). Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each included example of logos, ethos, and pathos in his speech. However, one crucial mistake that Brutus made when speaking is letting Antony speak after him. He cannot counter what Antony says, and does not know what he tells the people. Because of the way Antony spoke and what he included in his speech, he is able to come out on top. The people are able to relate to the emotion that is pouring out of Antony, whereas they merely listened to the facts that Brutus spoke to them.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both speeches of Brutus and Antony about Caesar’s death were compelling, but Mark Antony’s speech was overall superior to that of Brutus’s, for he won back the Roman people’s loyalty. In Brutus’s speech, he tries to invoke the people of Rome using ethos. Brutus uses ethos to credit himself, saying that the people should trust his words. The people of Rome can trust in his words because he is a part of the government, so in using ethos was an effective way on persuading the people.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This battle of words takes place during Caesar’s funeral, where both Anthony and Brutus speak in a bid to win over the large crowds of plebeians. There is a major difference between the two character’s and how they address the crowds. Brutus speaks first and reasoning with the crowd using logic; Brutus uses superlatives to argue his case more persuasively: “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (3.2.20) Through juxtaposing Caesar and Rome, Brutus hopes to simplify his argument against Caesar in order for the plebeians to understand more clearly. This is reinstated by the fact that Shakespeare had Brutus speak in prose which was the style of speech used by the common man.…

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony write speeches after Caesars death trying to convince the crowd to let them be the leader of Rome. After comparing both speeches it is clear that both of them use ethos, pathos, and logos trying to convince the crowd. However, Brutus is a move persuasive speaker, but Antony also uses ethos, pathos, and logos trying to convince the crowd. Brutus speech was more convincing than Antony speech. Both Brutus and Antony use pathos trying to persuade the crowd.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare's play “ The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches upon Caesar's death. Mark Antony uses the right rhetorical devices to win the crowd's affection and trust. Mark Antony's original intent appears to be to express his anger of the death of his friend. “ Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears” (3.2.75-109) he uses ethos here as he addresses the crowd as friends first establishing a sense of comfort and trust for his speech. Brutus’s original intent appears to be to explain why he killed caesar.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Persuasion

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, Brutus’s speech is far more inferior to Antony’s, in which Antony successfully able to convince the raging mob of commoners to rebel against the conspirators. Once Antony had finally gained the trust of the people, like most political leaders, he manipulates the words of Brutus to benefit himself and his own political agenda. Yet, the people listen and fall in order with Antony, like soldiers in the army, as Antony motivates them to go to war. As a result, Antony sways the opinions of the people from the conspirators to his side and sends the commoners off to battle. Obviously, Antony use of ethos and logos is far more superior to Brutus’s ability to sway the people.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first place, Antony states, “You will compel me, than, to read the will” (3.2)? Similarly, Antony wanted to trick the crowd into keeping him longer. In other words, Antony planned to mention to the crowd that he had Caesar’s will, but would then subtly put it away. Once Antony had changed the subject, he would use the persuasive technique of Pathos and change their emotions to cause the crowd to feel eager about hearing what Caesar had left them all in his will. Another key point was when Antony said, “Alas, you know not: I must tell you then: You have forgot the will I told you of” (3.2).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition to defending a Caesar’s dead body Antony had to go back in the past to things he has done for the people, and he is not even defending himself. Not alone that Antony has to worry about the conspirators, he even sent a servant to the scene of murder to make sure he was not a target on the group of conspirators list. Consequently, leading to Antony fearing for his life while giving his speech. Then after he gave his speech he was able not only calm the crowd, but to convince them to go against the conspirators and want kill them. Overall while Brutus’s speech was exceptional and was able to calm the crowd and change their minds into thinking Caesar was a tyrant.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yara Mneimneh Mrs. Kate Bowler English 10 A 12 December 2015 Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Speech In Act III Scene II, Marc Antony presents his famous speech that begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”, this speech was able to change the minds of the audience to turn against the conspirators. The purpose of Antony's speech was to show tribute to his friend Caesar in a eulogy and to revolt the audience. Antony wanted the audience to revolt for him to seek revenge on Caesar’s brutal murder. The purpose contributed to the significance of the speech in the play.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays