Marc Antony's Funeral Speech

Superior Essays
Yara Mneimneh
Mrs. Kate Bowler
English 10 A
12 December 2015
Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Speech
In Act III Scene II, Marc Antony presents his famous speech that begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”, this speech was able to change the minds of the audience to turn against the conspirators. The purpose of Antony's speech was to show tribute to his friend Caesar in a eulogy and to revolt the audience. Antony wanted the audience to revolt for him to seek revenge on Caesar’s brutal murder. The purpose contributed to the significance of the speech in the play. The speech was crucially significant because in Brutus’s speech, it is claimed that the reason Caesar was killed was for the best interest
…show more content…
Firstly, Antony uses the stylistic choice of irony when the conspirators and Brutus were called honourable men. Everytime Antony described Brutus as “honourable” he would use an increasingly sarcastic tone, until the last time in the speech, it was felt as if the meaning was changed. The last time Antony calls Brutus honourable, the speech hugely impacts the crowd to changing the mindset of Brutus’s, which is that Caesar was killed for the better of Rome, to the mindset that Brutus and the rest of the conspirators are traitors. The use of irony converted the mood of the audience from accepting Caesar’s death, to feeling angry and in need to assassinate Caesar’s killers. Additionally, the use of irony in the speech advocates the theme of fire and blood, because Antony was trying to convey the message of assassinating Brutus and also, he was smearing Caesar’s blood among all the conspirators. Secondly, Antony uses the stylistic choice of rhetorical questions like “Does this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (III.II.90) to make the audience reconsider the stereotype of Caesar being ambitious and also for Shakespeare to convey Antony’s main argument. Linking back to the purpose, Antony uses a tone of frustration to convey the fact that Caesar was rather not ambitious and evidence is used when the refusal of the crown three times was refused. After this piece of evidence was …show more content…
It will start out with a little bit of an aggressive tone to reflect Antony’s frustration with the audience being disruptive. Then the scene will continue with this tone until Antony starts to call Brutus “honourable” here, a sarcastic tone will be used but it will be subtle at the same time, to reflect how Antony is trying to send the opposite message to the audience, but he is trying to be benign about it. The subtle tone will proceed for a short amount of time, as it will be become a much louder tone, when Antony calls all the conspirators honourable, because in this moment he will be underlying scorn. The tone will become much more emotional rather than aggressive, as Caesar’s faithfulness will be stated and it will reflect the memory of Caesar. During the rhetorical questions (about Caesar’s ambition), Antony will ask these in a way that an answer is expected to show the audience the wrong of their thinking. In the end of the scene, it will be the most emotional as the performer will start to feel tears in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech was based on the use of pathos. He mentioned the will of Caesar but then told the people, “It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (Anderson 840). The people did not realize that he was manipulating them into demanding to hear the will. His speech was filled with emotional appeals and veiled calls to action such as this. At one point in his speech, he crooned, “Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny” (Anderson 838).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mark Antony says, “If it were so, it was a grievous fault; / And grievously hath Caesar answer’d it” (Shakespeare 598). There is importance in these two eleven syllable lines. Antony is not only bringing attention to the seriousness of the sin of ambition, but also how serious of a price Caesar paid for it. This proves important when Antony is able to turn the audience’s view around that the men who killed Caesar were in fact the ambitious ones, and that Caesar did not deserve his death. This way the crowd can still see ambition as a “grievous fault” while exonerating Caesar of it, and in turn have the justification of taking down his killers for unfairly ending his life.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Initially, Antony presents a tone of sincerity and relative agreement with the conspirators: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (). However, as his oration progresses, so too does the tone toward a more dramatic categorization. While Antony prepares to read Caesar’s will to the Roman citizens, he indicates the specific wounds inflicted by Cassius and Brutus: “Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through... Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed” (). As a plebeian shouts, “O traitors, villains!”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His point is important in his argument because it uses the emotions of the audience as a way for them to feel anger towards Caesar, ultimately allowing them to realize that under Caesar, they would be slaves. Out of the arguments Marc Antony and Brutus presented, Brutus had the stronger of the two. Brutus used this argument and emotion to get the pulpit to agree with him because the audience can easily comprehend what he is saying and he presents it in such a way that if Caesar were not to have been killed, this slavery would have been the only…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He does it in a very smart way though while following the rules Brutus has given him. Instead of telling the citizens flat out that they should join his side and that Brutus’ and the rest of the conspirators that killed Caesar were wrong for killing him. He does it using verbal irony. Four different phrases Antony uses in his speech that contain verbal irony will be explained throughout this document.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While justifying his reasons for the speech, that he “[isn’t speaking] to disprove what Brutus spoke” but rather “speaks what he knows,” Antony uses verbal irony. The statement contains irony because he says that he speaks not to disprove Brutus, however he did the opposite by the claims against the Conspirators. Using the irony as bait to draw in the citizens, Antony builds on his tone of manipulation. The irony makes him appear as a good guy, that does not speak out against others, so the people respect him differently. He manipulates them into listening to the rest of the words he must say.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This grows his credibility in the eyes of the people and the people begin to put their faith in him and his point of view. Antony also says in his speech, “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” Through this simple statement he is proving to the simple people in the audience that his character is not one that would mess with their minds, or try to convince them of something they don’t already believe him. Now whether these statements are his true character or not is irrelevant. The audience believes his intentions and choses to follow his ideas rather than the ideas of Brutus, making him the more effective speaker in this…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony tells everyone how genuine Caesar is as he is a faithful and just [friend]; when Antony talks about Caesar’s loyalty in their friendship, it shows how Antony forces the Plebeians to sincerely feel that Caesars murder is a dishonorable crime (3.2.84). Likewise, Antony states Caesar’s hidden love for his people when he sees “Caesar [weep] when the poor weep” ;(3.2.90). The argument, that Caesar’s stabbing is unjust must be true because when Caesar weeps for the poor, it demonstrates how he offers his heart and love to all types of Romans. Additionally, Antony describes Caesar’s good side, where he “trice refuses the crown”; this is significant because it makes the audience feel remorse for believing he is a Tyrant (3.2.95). When Caesar declines the crown three times, he wants to make sure the Romans support him.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first place, Antony states, “You will compel me, than, to read the will” (3.2)? Similarly, Antony wanted to trick the crowd into keeping him longer. In other words, Antony planned to mention to the crowd that he had Caesar’s will, but would then subtly put it away. Once Antony had changed the subject, he would use the persuasive technique of Pathos and change their emotions to cause the crowd to feel eager about hearing what Caesar had left them all in his will. Another key point was when Antony said, “Alas, you know not: I must tell you then: You have forgot the will I told you of” (3.2).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another example of a rhetorical question in Brutus's speech is when Brutus says "Who is here so vile that will not love his country?" In that last quote notice he started with "Who is here" He say that many times in the speech which is repetition for impact, he uses this to persuade the crowd. That device works as a list to make it seem like there were many reasons for the assassination and he keeps reinforcing his opinions with repetition. Brutus also explained that he didn't hate Caesar, but that he loved Rome more. He says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more" this shows it would have been hard to kill Caesar, as he loved him, but he is so sure it is right he had to killed him.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By using flattery, Antony is able to bring the Plebeians to his side through his speeches at Caesar’s funeral. First, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious… And Brutus is an honourable man” (III,ii,77-87). Antony constantly gives credit to the conspirators, especially Brutus. He repeatedly shows that the other speakers at Caesar’s funeral were honorable too.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Once they do however, Antony 's speech becomes much more interesting. Each seemingly complimentary statement about Brutus and the others becomes a disguised insult. Every kind word is another jab. This is another tactic used by Antony to dance around Brutus 's demands, and one that works…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays