Julius Caesar Persuasion

Improved Essays
Persuasion influences our society by the environment, leaders, and knowledge that dictates the decisions of the world. In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Antony uses persuasion to manipulate the audience for his own political agenda. The play takes place in Ancient Rome, where the senators have all gathered with concerns of their leader, Julius Caesar, and fears his growing ambition. A small group senators formed a group of conspirators, led by Brutus and Cassius, to vanquish Caesar’s ambition and rising power by stabbing him 23 times. Now with Caesar dead, Mark Antony, Caesar's right-hand man, convinces the conspirators hold a funeral for Caesar because of his admiration among the citizens and to let him speak at Caesar's …show more content…
To ease the raging mob of commoners, Antony tacitly opens with “[Caesar] was my friend, faithful and just to me” (3.2.94). Illustrating Antony’s persuasiveness by promoting Caesar, while presenting their friendship. By doing so, it shows Caesar's loyalty and his admiration for his friend, to attempt to make the citizens feel the same way. Further on, Antony mentions “Brutus is an honourable man…[and he speaks] not to disprove what Brutus spoke, but here [he is] to speak of what [he] do know” (3.2.96-110). Antony wisely chooses to indirectly point out the betrayal of Brutus, by demonstrating Brutus’s credibility and using it against him. Reflecting poorly on Brutus behalf because it shows how he is all right with betraying someone who honored him, making Brutus seem heartless, a trait that someone with authority should not acquire. Which in the end, his use of ethos reflects the credibility of Antony in a positive way, while diminishing the credibility of …show more content…
However, Brutus’s speech is far more inferior to Antony’s, in which Antony successfully able to convince the raging mob of commoners to rebel against the conspirators. Once Antony had finally gained the trust of the people, like most political leaders, he manipulates the words of Brutus to benefit himself and his own political agenda. Yet, the people listen and fall in order with Antony, like soldiers in the army, as Antony motivates them to go to war. As a result, Antony sways the opinions of the people from the conspirators to his side and sends the commoners off to battle. Obviously, Antony use of ethos and logos is far more superior to Brutus’s ability to sway the people. Humorously, Shakespeare’s use of ethos and logos is comical because of he able to make fun of how society is swayed so easily to follow the words of a leader, buy a product, or even a person vote in an election. Overall, these modes of persuasions are evident in how a society is able to function and how everyday decisions of all people are swayed to one side or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He hopes the people will think he is more trustworthy using ethos. Antony also uses ethos by saying "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransom did the general coffers fill. " Antony lets the people forgot about Brutus's speech by telling them about all the people he brought home. Brutus tries to convince the people…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare during 1599 in London, it's a play of Tragic drama and historical drama. The setting is during ancient Rome, toward the end of the roman republic. The most essential moment of the play was the tragic death of Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar was a successful military leader and highly respected, but he started to change, becoming overly ambitions, easily flattered over the most little of comments and assuming power without the proper authority, becoming more arrogant and domineering, not the kind of man who is leader material. The power of persuasion is the central plot of Julius Caesar, The conspirators know their is safety in numbers and need to persuade as many people to join their cause as possible.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From Ancient Literature to modern day writings, Aristotle's rhetoric had influenced authors to induce by appealing to a reason or an understanding. One of the famous writings, well-known for its significant use of ethical, logical and emotional appeals was William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar. In other words, one of the main characters, Mark Antony relies upon Aristotle’s rhetorical strategies - ethos, pathos, and logos - within William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar to persuade the Plebeians to revolt against the murderers of Caesar and start a civil war in Rome. Firstly, Mark Antony uses ethical appeals to establish his authority as an honorable individual among the Plebeians.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each included example of logos, ethos, and pathos in his speech. However, one crucial mistake that Brutus made when speaking is letting Antony speak after him. He cannot counter what Antony says, and does not know what he tells the people. Because of the way Antony spoke and what he included in his speech, he is able to come out on top. The people are able to relate to the emotion that is pouring out of Antony, whereas they merely listened to the facts that Brutus spoke to them.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both speeches of Brutus and Antony about Caesar’s death were compelling, but Mark Antony’s speech was overall superior to that of Brutus’s, for he won back the Roman people’s loyalty. In Brutus’s speech, he tries to invoke the people of Rome using ethos. Brutus uses ethos to credit himself, saying that the people should trust his words. The people of Rome can trust in his words because he is a part of the government, so in using ethos was an effective way on persuading the people.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine losing a best friend. Imagine never getting to say goodbye to them after witnessing their last breath while being brutally murdered. Imagine having to stand in front of a crowd trying to reason their death with them while trying to comprehend the death itself. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Mark Antony has to fill these dreadful shoes and take the first step in the right direction after witnessing the murder of his closest friend, Julius Caesar. In act three Antony stands in front of the group of Plebians after they have just listened Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar needed to be killed.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Brutus’ speech the crowd supports his decision, they believe Caesar was corrupt and he had to die. Next Marc Antony, Julius Caesar’s right hand man, stepped up to talk. In his speech he used pathos to pull at the crowd’s emotions and logos to remind them why they loved Caesar. “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.” Antony says, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome… When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.”…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea, spawned by Cassius, has been taken over by Brutus and together they have killed him. Afterward, they chose to talk to the people and try to show them they did it for an honorable cause. Brutus gives a funeral speech, and then allows Mark Antony some time to speak as well. Mark Antony remains loyal to Caesar and questions…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus states," Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe. " On the other hand Antony's use of ethos retains to the reputation of Caesar and the many things that he had done for Rome. " He hath brought many captives home to fill" states Anthony. Antony's use of ethos is more effective because he tells the people the good that Caesar has done, and the people are not just going to forget something as this just because Brutus states his reliability. Logos, the use of logic…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He accomplishes this with one rhetorical device called litotes, which denies a point in order to affirm it. (Leithart 98) Antony 's speech is full of litotes, "I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke." (3.2.103) In this case, Antony proclaims that he does not wish to refute Brutus, but in reality that 's exactly what he means to accomplish. Antony exercises irony also, continually reiterating that Brutus and the conspirators are honorable men who acted nobly by killing Caesar. By the end of his speech, the ironical nature of this point became apparent to the Roman people.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wants everyone to remember that he is a honorable leader of Rome by saying, "not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more." He wants to give off the idea that he is a very patriotic person and he loves his country so much, that he would betray his best friend just to make Rome happy. Antony goes on to say, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me. But Brutus say he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man. " Antony never once disrespected Brutus, because he always told the crowd how much of an honorable man he was.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus was more successful along the lines of giving the people insight of his perspective, yet Antony was powerful and vulnerable with the people as he detailed the murder of his king, For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, ingratitude, more strong than traitors’ arms, quite vanquished him. Then burst his mighty heart, and, in his mantle muffling up his face, even at the base of Pompey’s statue (which all the while ran blood) great Caesar fell. O, what a fall was there, my countrymen! Then I and you and all of us fell down, with bloody treason flourished over us.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murder is defined as the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. The thing about definitions is they can change from person to person, depending on what they want it to read. So, one person 's perspective of murder can be different than another person 's perspective. Maybe that is why Brutus felt murdering Caesar was OK to do, maybe his perspective of murder is different than mine. Julius Caesar was brutally murdered by, his lifelong friend, Brutus and other conspirators.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays