Rhetorical Analysis Of Mark Antony's Speech

Improved Essays
Frances Reilly pd9 2/14/18
Mr.Demmers english Julius Caesar “When dealing with people, remember you are not dealing with creatures of logic, but with creatures of emotion” said by Dale Carnegie. This represents Mark Antony’s speech for Caesars funeral as well as his ascension. His is more effective since he appeals to the Romans emotionally then logically and direct. Also Antony is justifying Caesars death rather then proving himself that he’s an honorable man. Marc Antony uses repetition synecdoches, alliteration, and an ethos appeal to seek revenge on conspirators in his speech. People say that Brutus’ speech is more effective but I disagree. Marc Antony does not overestimate his audience. He speaks to the crowd, rather
…show more content…
Brutus’ tone was unapologetic, sad for having to kill Caesar, and “honorable”. Even though Antony’s tone is angry towards the end it starts off appeasing the crowds then humble or sincere. When you speak to the audience with respect rather then as lower class you gain more admiration. Also the fact that he went after Brutus helped him to be more effective since he can prove Brutus’s statement incorrect and press the right buttons. Therefore, Mark Antony’s speech was more successful.

With the use of rhetorical devices it helped Marc Antony speech to be more effective. In his speech he frequently used the following phrase, “But Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honorable man”. Antony is being sarcastic and he’s trying to prove a point that Brutus was not an honorable man. It evolves to show the opposite attraction of “ambitious” and “honorable man”. He is not an honorable man since he was so easily convinced by Cassius to commit a murder. Maybe he did do the best thing for Rome but he broke a bond and killed one of his friends how is that honorable? He was disloyal. Furthermore Antony is attempting to portray Brutus as ungrateful an treacherous. Repetition helps him to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech was based on the use of pathos. He mentioned the will of Caesar but then told the people, “It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (Anderson 840). The people did not realize that he was manipulating them into demanding to hear the will. His speech was filled with emotional appeals and veiled calls to action such as this. At one point in his speech, he crooned, “Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny” (Anderson 838).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion, Antony speech was more delivered better because includes several persuasive details in his speech. After saying that his intent wasn't to praise Caesar, he says, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me. " Antony's speech points out many of Caesar acts that had benefited them as Roman citizens. He plays with their minds saying that Caesar had been generous to them and protected them from the "intruders". He uses rhetorical questions, irony, and etc. to effectively persuade his audience to join his side instead of Brutus'.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Brutus is an honorable man.” (Act 3, Scene 2). Mark Antony as well as Brutus both used very convincing techniques to sway in their favor. Mark Antony did have a better way with words, as we would say. He had a more respectable tone as well as diction.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All three of these speeches provide exceptional examples of rhetorical devices that are influential in literature. Throughout the duration of Antony’s speech, repetition is used to stress the significance of certain phrases. When referring to Brutus, Antony repeats the phrase, “honorable man” four separate times. This indirectly implies that in Antony’s eyes, Brutus is a sinner, and therefore, he is not honorable.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Brutus and Antony are able to use the skill of rhetoric to get what they want, but who used it better? Antony is cunning and uses rhetoric effortlessly in his speech. After Brutus speaks to the crowd, Antony is next and he persuades the people to his side by countering Brutus about everything he said. His speech is powerful and he moves the crowd so deeply they begin to riot and kill innocent people. Antony used pathos and grabbed the Roman people's attentions by getting to their emotions.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both speeches of Brutus and Antony about Caesar’s death were compelling, but Mark Antony’s speech was overall superior to that of Brutus’s, for he won back the Roman people’s loyalty. In Brutus’s speech, he tries to invoke the people of Rome using ethos. Brutus uses ethos to credit himself, saying that the people should trust his words. The people of Rome can trust in his words because he is a part of the government, so in using ethos was an effective way on persuading the people.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After reading the two speeches I disagree with Antony stating he is “no orator as Brutus is, but a plain blunt man”(III.ii.220). I disagree with Antony portraying himself as a plain blunt man because the way he speaks to the crowd of Rome reveals his manipulative, selfish and conniving ways. He does not want what is best for Rome, but only what is best for…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, some individuals affirm Marc Antony’s employment of ethos and pathos as brainwashing his audience to follow his will without personal thought. These individuals, however, overlook the idea that Marc Antony surfaces the people’s own thoughts on the morality of the assassination. For example, Antony commences his eulogy by addressing the audience and asking them to “lend [him their] ears; / [He comes] to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (III. ii. 73-74).…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe. While…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays