Rene Descartes True Or False

Improved Essays
Descartes starts off by saying that all the old opinions and beliefs that he had accepted as true were actually false. They were highly doubtful and he took time out of his retirement to reexamine them. He said that there was no need in proving al his old opinions wrong, but it was not necessarily wrong to believe in them either. Descartes says that beliefs are received from your sense and sometimes these senses mislead us, and because of this deception, it is hard to put total confidence in those sense or beliefs that some from your senses. Descartes says that there is no other information source, or hardly any other, that give you direct information like the senses, which is why it is almost impossible to doubt them. Descartes goes on to describe himself sitting there next to a fire and the fact …show more content…
Even the colors of dreams and paintings are real because they cannot be made up or original. Things such as Astronomy, Physics and Medicine are based off of composite objects and are of doubtful character, while things such as Arithmetic and Geometry are based on simple, general objects. He gives the example that you always know that 2+3=5 and there are 4 sides to a square, for it is not possible for them to be false. Descartes then talks about how God created him, but how does he know that God actually created anything around him and that he is not just being deceived, or everything else is just a perception of the mind? How do we know we are not being deceived each time we add 2+3? Or count the sides of a square? He then questions whether or not God deceives us, but then says that he is good and would not do that, except for sometimes. Descartes says that however we were made, we are the imperfect enough to be the “constant victim of deception.” Descartes ends by saying that he became his own deceiver by believing that his old opinions are all false and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    So Descartes is still going off of assumptions to prove his theory. He tries to resolve this problem by doubting everything around us in the physical world. Descartes proposes that if we doubt everything, the only thing we can be certain of is that we are alive (in the mind) because we can think (I think therefore I am). He has three propositions…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His initial premise, doubting reality, follows the process of thinking regarding the mind's perception of its environment. The body and mind are separate in Descartes' understanding. Though they work in tandem, human experience is dependent on the mind. The body is merely a vessel for the mind, and its senses cannot be trusted to determine reality. The mind, then, is what must be examined to determine the scope of reality.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that “deception is incompatible with God”. This conclusion is based on a relatively simple argument. Descartes makes the assumption that deception is sign of imperfection. He maintains that while the ability to deceive is impressive, the desire to deceive is inherently imperfect and weak. God, however, is perfect in all ways and thus deception is incompatible with God.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of doing so, Descartes was able to rebuild his beliefs on the foundation of this things that he knew for certain was true. Descartes believed that trying to debunk all of his beliefs would be tedious so instead, he concluded that all of this beliefs came from the senses. He also concluded that the senses sometimes deceive us, thus they have a possibility of being false. Descartes does not argue that because we are sometimes fooled by the senses that we are always fooled by them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Descartes puts forward the reasonable proposition that if something has deceived us once then we can never completely trust that thing again. So since our senses deceive us on a regular basis then we shouldn’t trust our senses at all. Now the issue here is that Descartes conclusion of not trusting our senses at all is very extreme and unreasonable, in fact it goes against his original proposition of not completely trusting that which has deceived you even once. Descartes conclusion jumps past just not completely trusting your senses instead saying you shouldn’t trust your senses at all. The logic doesn’t work since Descartes had it right with his original proposition.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Naïve Realism Theory

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For this to be true to him the beliefs could never be wrong. According to Descartes methodology is to determine whether beliefs are completely reliable and to do this one must be completely positive in the certainty of the belief, and to be certain is to be free of doubt. So Descartes searches for certainty through the methods of Naïve Realism, and in this search senses are observed and used to determine if a…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He instead uses these points to show a bigger truth that nothing can be proven with our senses. How can one prove that anything around them is real? Without senses and the knowledge people have been taught over time, there is no way to prove the life around them is real. Descartes argues that nothing is certain without knowledge to back it up. At a time when most philosophers used God to back their…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to do this he uses what is referred to as the method of doubt. (Broughton, 2003) Descartes’ method of doubt is to analyse and reject every belief that it is possible to cast the slightest of doubt upon. This method was not to look at every belief separately but to look at…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Descartes argues that the only way to arrive at the truth is to postpone on judgment until something is “clearly and distinctly understood.” He comes to this conclusion by first stating that as a creation of God we are imbued with free will and understanding, and since God is a being of ultimate goodness, he therefore would not imbue us with gifts that would deceive us as “trickery or deception are always indicative of some imperfection (54).” Descartes also posits that although humans are made in the image of God, and therefore are imbued with similar traits, we cannot reach his level of perfection because we find ourselves in between “…the supreme being and non-being (55).” By this Descartes means that although we at birth, are given the…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His reflection on reason in Part IV reveals the foundation for method in the way the mind works when disconnected from all distractions. As a result of Descartes being able to awareness of his own personal imperfections, he is able to reaffirm his belief in a supreme being, God. He exclaims “It thus remained that this idea had been placed in me by a nature truly more perfect than I was and that it even had within itself all the perfections of which I could have any idea, that is to say, to explain myself in a single word, that it was God” (Descartes 19). In other words, Descartes is stating that God exists because he is able to recognize his own imperfections. Instead of simply rewriting the words of Machiavelli, Descartes imitates his writing style and adds his own method to attract people and help them understand the use, application, and significance of his writing and…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that the knowledge we have learned is based on opinions that vary and have no certainty. From this realization, Descartes went on a destructive process where he went to a cottage and subjected everything to systematic doubt. The destructive process was comprised of four steps. First, Descartes was not going to accept anything for true that he did not clearly know for himself was true. Second, he divided ideas into difficulties and tried to split them into as many parts as possible.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One, that our perceptions and ideas are caused by physical objects, Two, that they are caused by ourselves, or three, that they are caused by God. The first of these can be overruled because it is the very nature of physical objects which he is trying to discover. The second, that we give ourselves these ideas, Descartes sees an invalid as well because he believes that since we are finite, and God in infinite, we could not conjure up the idea of God. It is for this reason that He believes that God must exist because our idea of his in inert. Meaning it was planted there in our nonphysical DNA so to speak.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays