The Naïve Realism Theory

Improved Essays
Naïve Realism is a theory that the world is perceived exactly how it is, and can be thought of as the commonsense theory of humans perception. Naïve Realism says that the world that we experience through our senses is acceptable, meaning that the objects we discover with our senses are there, and they have the properties we see them to have. Although Naïve Realism, as a theory may seem very plausible, it has one major problem; that being that human perceptions vary, and what might seem to be to one person, may not to another. So to make this theory reasonable, it is thought that all objects are the same as they always were, only our experiences of them are changed or different. Descartes began with the idea of Naïve Realism, under which he wanted to determine if we could be sure of anything, and for this to be true to Descartes, something has to be “stable and enduring”. For this to be true to him the beliefs could never be wrong. According to Descartes methodology is to determine whether beliefs are completely reliable and to do this one must be completely positive in the certainty of the belief, and to be certain is to be free of doubt. So Descartes searches for certainty through the methods of Naïve Realism, and in this search senses are observed and used to determine if a …show more content…
Material substance doe not exist according to him, and that regularities deny that ideas are casual. Also Berkeley supports the ideas of mind and spirit existence so he says that a spirit is responsible for all of these regularities. So when something is not around to perceive something happening, Berkeley assumes that God perceives it. For Berkeley the external world exists because God always perceives it. This makes the argument about “external world skepticism” unreasonable in Berkeley’s terms because it exists because of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For instance, with popper you can believe in anything as long as it is proven false. While Berkeley limits you to just the senses while their can still be thought outside of the senses and Descartes does not have enough physical evidence. I believe that the external and internal world is in conjunction with one another. In order for us to be alive we must have both for the body cannot live without the mind, and the mind cannot live without the body. The mind and the body both formulate a recipe which allows us to live with reason and a physical body, but our knowledge on what is true or not cannot just be left to one of the aspects that keep you alive.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Naïve Realism and Amnesia Naïve realism is the belief that we see the world exactly as it is, without objective or bias from influence of upbringing. Consequentially, naïve realism can pose an important problem when judging appearances as well as evaluating the objectives and biases of ourselves and those around us. For instance, if one was out in public with their partner, they may both exhibit different levels of comfort with reagrds to public affection without realizing that they most likely mediate different social attitudes, ideological beliefs, preferences, cultural and religious backgrounds, and biased personal interests, and each will assume the other is wrong. One’s instinctual common sense will tell them that their own opinion…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes wrote an influential piece named the “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In this work, his “First Meditation” mainly deals with doubt of existence and how doubt is made possible because of sensory deception. He creates the dream argument that argues about how it is possible to be uncertain about whether or not a person is in a real world or dream world. In philosopher G.E. Moore’s “Certainty” he attempts to debunk Descartes’ argument through showing the inconsistencies in his dream argument. Since Descartes’ argument is built on inconsistency, Moore’s replies are satisfactory.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Descartes, things are sure paying little mind to sense experience and it appears to be rationally unthinkably to think about them as false. Given this, Descartes builds up his reasoning for the existence of God as an all-perfect being. He does this by starting with a thought that is viewed as sure and ascribing what makes us feel as though something is sure. For this situation he considers something sure as something so plainly and strikingly saw that it can't be untrue. Here he infers then that for something to be true, I simply need to have an unmistakable and distinctive thought of it and that alone is sufficient precursor for its truth-esteem.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes Ignorance

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Descartes way to achieve assurance was to initiate by doubting absolutely everything. The belief or principle or general truth would have to be impossible to doubt; its assurance would have to be eventual and not contingent upon any other belief, and it would have to indicate to something actually existing if the existence of other things in the world were to be concluded from it. Descartes examined his beliefs by groups or classes to observe if he could find one that was impossible to doubt. He began to examine those beliefs based on sense perceptions, deducing in the eventual that they were unreliable and therefore couldn't lead to certain knowledge . In regards to the wax example, the wax example exemplifies how knowledge cannot fundamentally…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    B In Berkeley’s “Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous,” he aims to defend idealism (immaterialism), or the notion that real objects are mind-dependent ideas, by attacking the materialist view, or the belief that material things exist independent of the mind. Berkeley believes that the way the current metaphysics is spent doubting is ineffective. He views that philosophers have wasted their lives doubting what others already know exists. Hence, he believes that knowledge is attained through the senses and not by doubting.…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of those objections is that just because we cannot know what underlies matter, does not mean that it does not exist independently of our perception of it: so “to show that matter is impossible, Berkeley must show that only what is perceivable exists” (Dialogue 1: Slide 17). There is however, a problem that follows this come back as well. If existence requires being perceived, then when we stop looking at material objects, they would technically stop existing (Morrison, Nov. 22). But Berkeley claims that it still exists because God perceives it. For Berkeley, God always perceives everything.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to do this he uses what is referred to as the method of doubt. (Broughton, 2003) Descartes’ method of doubt is to analyse and reject every belief that it is possible to cast the slightest of doubt upon. This method was not to look at every belief separately but to look at…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will explain Rene Descartes’ response from his Sixth Meditation to his dreaming argument from the First Meditation. Descartes’ Meditations are the processes of thinking that he attempted to create a stronger basis for our ways of thinking by doubting on various beliefs that are skeptical. In his Sixth Meditation, Descartes found an answer to his doubt and used that to refute his first premise of the dreaming argument. He knew that he could actually tell the different whether he was dreaming or not by matching the information he perceived and tracing it back to his memory. I will first introduce Descartes’ dreaming argument and then explain why the premises in his dreaming arguments are valid.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He threw out all the previous information he had known or acquired and tore down the construct that information conveyed through sensory perception was accurate. For example, Descartes argues that “there are never…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their writings, Descartes and Berkeley argue the nature of sensible objects. Sensible objects are what are perceivable to the mind. The nature of how these objects are perceived and if, what the mind perceives exists is the foundation of both Descartes and Berkeley’s arguments. Are sensible objects distinctly external matter that are perceived by the mind, or are they created within the distinct mind and perceived directly. The arguments are related to Descartes and Berkeley’s different stances on rationalism and empiricism, or if our minds identify knowledge of sensible objects through experience or innate knowledge.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    truths regarding math etc. that did not require sensory experience could be attained by reason alone; other knowledge however, which required experience of the world alongside reason was doubtful. This knowledge could not be regarded as absolute as it required experiences which could not be trusted to be accurate. He added to this assertion by arguing that although dreams appear as real as waking experiences, these dreams cannot provide persons with knowledge, they can only draw from conscious sensory experiences. Also, since knowledge consciously derived from the senses can be the cause of illusions, then sense experience itself can be doubtable.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays