To What Extent Was Robespierre Justified

Superior Essays
The Reign of Terror: Was it Justified? A kitten desperately howls as her assertive owner restricts her wish to roam the danger filled streets. In the eyes of the naive kitten, the owner’s consideration for her safety is perceived as nothing but an unjust limitation to her individual freedom. Robespierre’s duty as the ruler is similar to the one of a pet owner. The kitten, who represents the French counterrevolutionists, cluelessly whines against the owner because she does not know what is best for her. Robespierre, like the pet owner, instills limitations on the people 's rights to achieve what he believes to be the ideal France. During the rule of Louis XVI in the 1780s, profound problems like debt and inflation faced the country, sparking …show more content…
Soon after, revolution broke out as people chanted for liberty, equality and a sense of mutual friendship of the whole community. The strong advocate for complete political social reform, or radical leader, by the name of Maximilien Robespierre came to power. His rule became infamously known as “The Reign of Terror.” Some historians say that his actions were unjust and cruel while others argue that his measures were required and are justifiable. By examining Robespierre’s rule from historical evidence, one can see that “The Reign of Terror” is justified because the external threats did require it, the internal threats did deserve it, and the methods of response were not too harsh. Robespierre’s rule highlights the necessity to sacrifice individual rights for the greater good of a nation. By doing so, his attempts to conform the citizens to his ideals may be perceived as too extreme for some people, however, due to the destructive state

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This argues that the Reign of Terror was necessary to rescue France from invasion. The Austrians invaded because Queen Marie Antoinette was killed because she was convicted by the Revolutionary Tribunal of high treason, and executed by guillotine on the Place de la Révolution on October 16, 1793. Queen Marie Antoinette was also the daughter of Leopold II, who was the king of Austria. There is no doubt the Reign of terror had many negative impacts on society, however it was essential for France’s survival.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign of Terror was not justified in many ways, simply because the internal threats were never all that harmful, the external threats were very weak, and the extreme methods were used in a time of need and with unnecessary physical force. It was not justified because there is absolutely no reason to kill 20,000-40,000 with the guillotine. He killed a thousand people and took away their rights. This was Robespierre’s way of trying to make peace. “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible,” said Maximilien Robespierre.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robespierre emerged as the leader of the Reign of Terror. His influence from Rousseau was shown through the Republic of Virtue, but it was quickly twisted into a much darker idea. Robespierre then created the Committee of Public Safety which caused terror throughout France, and stated “Terror is nothing but prompt, severe, inflexible justice; it is therefore an emanation of virtue”(Document 7). Robespierre went against enlightenment ideals, such as Beccaria’s, by convicting citizen without evidence and prosecuting them without a trial. Robespierre soon went against Rousseau's idea that everyone was equal, because Robespierre clearly saw himself as being above the law.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This part in the French Revolution will eventually end with the person who started it, Maximilien Robespierre. Although the Reign of Terror had brutal violence, it was justified because of the resistance of the revolution in France, the foreign threats and to protect the public safety inside of France. The Reign of Terror was needed to because of the heavy revolution resistance in France. A map shows the areas of deepest resistance to the revolution in multiple cities in France. The map illustrates that many cities in…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the French Revolution, revolutionaries wanted to create a government that would value people’s rights. Unfortunately, violence started to play a role in order to achieve the goals of the revolution. The period in which the violence started became known as the Reign of Terror. Individual rights were being ignored and thousands of people were being executed because they were suspected of aiding or being an enemy. The Reign of Terror was not justified because the actions toward external threat did not require it, the actions toward internal threat did not deserve it, and the methods that were used were to extreme.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The great social theorist and philosopher, Isaiah Berlin once stated, “Injustice, poverty, slavery, ignorance - these may be cured by reform or revolution. But men do not live only by fighting evils. They live by positive goals, individual and collective, a vast variety of them, seldom predictable, at times incompatible.” In simpler terms, Berlin is saying that to cure injustice and poverty, men may use revolution and reform but they cannot “live only by fighting evils”, they must also live by positive goals that protect society’s interests as a whole and not become guided by their own ignorance. And it is for these reasons that Maximilien Robespierre’s Reign of Terror was not justified.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Terror was not simply the moment at which the French government unleashed its violence against its own people. The Terror, as it was seen during the Revolution itself, was rather a way by which one chose to think; it was, in essence, a rejection of monarchy and a willingness to proclaim full separation from the former rulers of the nation. This notion was perceived as an effort to intimidate the upper classes to enforce a new ideological era, not simply to employ physical violence against suspicious individuals. When Robespierre famously proclaimed that virtue and terror needed to be combined during the French Revolution, his message was not intended to be a justification of outright cruelty, but instead a compelling commentary on precisely how intimidation needed be used to threaten the royalist ideology. Indeed, while this was the valid historical use of the term, many abused its connotations and took it upon themselves to officiate a barbarous corporeal war against the French Republic’s supposed…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From 1789-1799 the French Revolution took place, when France’s government system of a monarchy was challenged and overthrown. France had many economic problems and was unstable due to the many disagreements amongst social classes and the King. Through an absolute monarch, there was much corruption and crisis, and change was needed. The National Assembly took action, (group members from the Bourgeoisie) and used Enlightenment ideas towards the ideal government, a constitutional monarchy. They moved the government from Versailles to Paris, where the people were.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was to help keep the French government a monarchy, but the people still revolted. The Reign of Terror was not justified because it was unnecessary, it was brutal, and it denied the French people’s natural rights. Thousands of innocent people died during the Reign of Terror. “We must smother…” The Reign of Terror was not…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideals of the government were natural rights and to protect the people. However, the Reign of Terror did not complete that. Instead, it went against people’s rights. Written by Steven Otfinoski, “Watch committees were set up in every neighborhood to ferret out and expel foreigners” (Doc E). This killed many people and threatened the right of equality.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robespierre believed that terror was a necessary evil, to obtain “liberty and equality.” The Terror had an economic side represented in the Maximum, a price-control measure demanded by the lower classes of Paris, and a religious side that was represented in the program of de-Christianization pursued by the followers of Jacques Hebert. Robespierre believed that without terror there was no justice and without virtue, there is no terror, and without terror there is no power. His powerful speech only confused the hungry citizens. Robespierre went to extreme measures to control political activity in France.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Reign of Terror, a time of depression and tremendous agony, a reasonable act? In the eyes of many, it was not reasonable due to all the effects it brought among the country of France. Therefore it is clear that the Reign of Terror was not justified, because…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Robespierre killed thousands of people, he believed he did it for the sake of the people to form a new government. As he stated, “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country 's most urgent needs” (Terror and Virtue Letter). The Reign of Terror ended when the citizens put Robespierre on trial and executed him in 1794. Even with many deaths, fears, and changes…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is barbarity ,” is a quote by Robespierre during his time in power within the Committee of General Security. Robespierre believed it was upon the population to act on the means of attainment of reign of the constitutional laws. His speech explores the influence of society upon the fundamental principle of the democratic or popular government. The failure by the population was not seen favourable by Robespierre and resulted in the adoption of the Committee of General Security managing the internal policy of the country. “…But when the people itself is corrupted, liberty is already lost,” reflects the attitude of the people within the context of the Industrial Revolution, when Terror was lawfully inaugurated as a policy on September 5th, 1793.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Revolution gained more power, its leaders became more paranoid. In 1793, Maximilien Robespierre, who had assumed most of the power in France, declared that a reign of terror would begin. During this period of time, the French government’s first priority was keeping the Revolution safe from people who wanted…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays