Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
After the War of Independence, the founding fathers sought to create a government unlike any that the world had previously seen. With their recent experiences under British rule, the United States did not want a powerful central government; therefore, they created a document in which all the power went to the states, the Articles of Confederation. When this document proved to be weak, the Founding Fathers began to re-evaluate their stance on a central government. This led to the idea of ratifying the United States Constitution. The Federalists, who supported the ratification, attempted to promote the ratification through a collection of essays called the Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the Constitution, …show more content…
Throughout this process, there was one overall winner, the Federalists. There are numerous ways that their victory is apparent in the United States Constitution. First, the Constitution implemented Madison’s system of checks and balances to prevent one particular branch from acquiring too much power. In Federalist 51, Madison expressed his fear of the government obtaining too much power. He explained that a system in which each branch overlooks the other two branches would “control the abuses of government” and ensure that no single branch would become too powerful (Madison). Furthermore, Madison’s idea from Federalist 10 was also incorporated into the Constitution. In his essay, he argued the importance of a Republic, opposed to …show more content…
For instance, they won the Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalists believed these ten amendments were necessary to protect individual freedoms and basic rights and prevent an over-powerful central government. Though the Federalists opposed this idea, they added it as a concession to the Anti-Federalists; they realized the only way they would achieve ratification to the Constitution would be to compromise. In the Tenth Amendment, the states are granted the powers not reserved for Congress (BarbourA-1). Despite their minor victories, the Anti-Federalists essentially lost in the ratification process. One specific example of their defeat can be seen in one of their essays, Brutus 3. In this essay, Brutus argued for equal representation within government, in which the number of people voting would be proportional to the number of people living in the states. Unfortunately, he lost this argument, and Article 1 of the Constitution implemented the three-fifths compromise (Barbour

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After the Constitution was written in 1787, many believed that the new government would still be giving too much power to the people running it instead of to the people. A group lead by Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and James Monroe called the Anit-Federalists went against the Constitution because they believed it gave too many powers to congress and did not specify enough human rights. They also believed that the checks and balances system will fair and the executive brach will turn into a monarchy. In fear that the states would not ratify the Constitution, James Madison composed a bill of nine articles of 20 amendments that limited power to congress to be added to the Constitution on July 8, 1789. Twelve of these were selected by congress…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They feared that that original text from the Constitution didn’t contain a bill of rights. The Federalist thought the Constitution didn’t need a bill of rights and they thought that the nation would possibly not survive without the passage from the Constitution. They also said that a stronger national government was required since the Articles of Confederation failed for not having a strong enough national…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The convention declared that since they were breaking from the Articles that if nine states ratified, those nine states would form a government. This document was extensively debated. A series of essays were published in favor of ratification. The essays are known now as the Federalist Papers and were written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. The supporters called themselves Federalists, and they sought to establish order.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the founding fathers were writing the constitution, there was much debate as to how strong they would allow the central government to become. For the Anti-Federalists in particular, it was important that the Constitution ensured the oppression the Americans had experienced under British rule could not be repeated. The purpose of Madison writing Federalist No. 51 was to convince Anti-Federalists, particularly those concentrated in New York, that the constitution would prevent the government from becoming too strong. If it were not ensured that the three branches of government would be independent of one another, and that a checks and balances system would be in place, it would have been more difficult for the constitution to have been ratified.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 responds to the Antifederalists argument that a “large republic” cannot long survive. Madison set out the task of devising a republic in which a majority of citizens will be unable to tyrannize the minority. Madison says the rotten apple is factions. Factions are defined as a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the delegates were ratifying the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. began to divide over whether the constitution was a really that great for the country or not. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists were against it. The Federalists were supporters of the U.S. Constitution because they needed a strong central government to protect their country.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the United States had just declared their independence, it was clear that governmental structure needed to be established. In 1777, the Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, which all states would ratify by 1781. The Articles of Confederation would prove to be a weak constitution, giving too much power to the states and not having a strong enough central government. This realization led to several changes being made until a new framework was implemented. The Constitution established a better relationship between central and state governments, while making sure that no form of government would become too powerful.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was agreed upon in the Constitution that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson). By stating this it was absolute that those who were in a position of power are there because the people they over-see. Some of the men behind the support for the Constitution were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Although the Federalist strongly supported this change there were many disagreements from the Anti-Federalist group. The main argument came from those who believed this new Constitution would strengthen government at the expense of its people and independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had. So Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Up until this point, there had been rising animosity in America because the majority of the thirteen states could be in favor of an amendment but it would only take one opposing state to nullify the opinions of all the others. Madison claimed that it was unreasonable for a government to rely on the unanimous approval of all states in order to abolish…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays