Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Constitutional Convention

Improved Essays
During the Constitutional Convention of 1786, one of the most important compromises of the early United States was the Great Compromise. Another compromise that happened at the Constitutional Convention was the Three-Fifths Compromise. These two compromises helped to establish the early government issues of the nation. Together these compromises allowed America to become united. In 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention meant to revise the Articles of Confederation. Instead they began a compromise to form a constitution. James Madison from Virginia proposed a plan that called for a three branch government: legislative, judicial, and executive. This was meant to separate the powers, assuring that not one group or individual could have too much authority. In this plan was also a system that allowed each branch to check the other. This was admitted to protect the interest of the citizen. Much of the debate surrounding the plan concentrated on legislation. The plan proposed that representation should be based …show more content…
The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution. These were known as the Federalist papers. Therefore, Americans asked that the Constitution had a Bill of Rights. Americans thought this would encourage the laws. They believed that it was needed to protect people against the power of the national government. The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted. In 1791, the Constitution’s first ten amendments became the law of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Virginia Plan weakened this state powers and empower the Congress, maintaining the harmony of the nation and push the political system to upper level. In the paper of “New Jersey Plan” by Levy, Leonard W, William…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S. Constitution set up America's national government and basic laws, and ensured certain fundamental rights for its natives. The Constitution was composed on September 17, 1787 by memebers from the Constitutional Convention in Philidelphia with George Washington as the pioneer. The main Constitution was endorsed in 1781 by the Articles of Confederation, when every one of the states were administrating like separate nations. The Articles of Confederation gave Congress the ability to administer outside issues, lead war and control cash be that as it may, in all actuality these forces were firmly constrained in light of the fact that Congress had no locale to authorize its solicitations to the states for cash or troops. Later on it turned…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the outbreak of the American Revolution, the Continental Congress created the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union in 1777 in order to keep all thirteen states united. However, the Articles of Confederation proved to be weak in the long term, as Congress had almost no power and could not enforce any decisions, as states had supreme power. Because the nation was in danger of collapse, delegates from five states attended the Annapolis Convention in order to discuss trade issues between states. The Constitutional Convention was called to revise the Articles of Confederation in the hopes of overhauling the national government. The main conflict at this convention was the concept of representation.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, the distribution of representation from the Virginia and New Jersey Plan widely differed. The Virginia Plan was highly represented by the more populous states within the federal government and the New Jersey Plan seemed to provide most of their representation through smaller states who wanted to prevent unbalancing the United…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    At Constitutional Convention there were a lot of compromises. One was between the Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan. The Virginia plan called for sovereignty to central government. It also called for the bigger the state the more votes. The New Jersey plan called for states to be in power, and for all states to have equal votes.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Debate

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prior to The Great Compromise of 1787, the two main plans put forth at the Constitutional Convention were the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The larger states favored the Virginia Plan, as the number of representatives in both houses of Congress per state was based strictly on population, giving them more power. The smaller states preferred the New Jersey Plan, which ensured that all states had the same number of votes. The Great Compromise, which became the basis of the new American government, was possible through the coming together of the small states and the large states. In this new plan, the number of representatives per state in the lesser House was based on population and the number of representatives in the upper House was the same for each state, satisfying both sides of the debate (Lapsansky-Werner, 356).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation Compromises

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Virginia Plan said that the number of votes per state should be determined by population, meaning states with higher population would have more votes in Congress, and states with less population would have less…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin this change, political men from each state met in Philadelphia in May of 1787 to discuss how to make their country better. They decided to stop trying to reform the Articles of Confederation and just restart with a new Constitution. The first thing to happen was the Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise. This arose from two smaller plans, the Virginia and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan was meant to work out for the larger states as it called for representation in the central government based on the population of each state.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Philadelphia Convention, better known as the Constitutional Convention, started in May of 1787 in “America’s largest and most sophisticated” city, Philadelphia. “Madison dreamt of a nation bound by ties among its people, not among its states. To achieve that goal, its founding document had to be ratified by the people through special conventions.” For Madison this goal was achievable thanks the unity of his fellow Virginian delegates, but unluckily for Hamilton “the New York delegation was sharply split between Hamilton, who…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While this rule was in play, there could not be any type of ratification for the constitution because Rhode Island exited themselves from the process. At the time the founders were establishing the Great Compromise for the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. This compromise provided a dual system of congressional representation. In which, the House of Representatives seats would be based off of each state’s population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the first issues that was faced in the convention was how the states would represented in the legislature. James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan as a proposal to address this. The Virginia Plan was put before the convention by Edmund Randolph and proposed the government to be made into three different branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. Of these branches, the people would vote in the members of the two legislative branches, and then the cabinet members of the legislative branches…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifty Federalists, with the same general idea of creating a stronger central government, all got together to draw up an entirely new charter, the modern day Constitution. Many debates occurred within the forming of this document, mainly revolving around slaves and specifications regarding the executive powers. The two main opposing members regarding the executive powers was Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton wanted a single man to be elected for life for executive power. The main argument against this was if one man was in charge, the government would be far too similar to a monarchy.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The author of the book A Brilliant Solution, Carol Berkin, a successful American historian that was born in 1942 in Alabama and was awarded the Bancroft Dissertation Award, from her college at Columbia University where she was awarded and an M.A. and a Ph.D. He has written many books In her book, she summarizes the key elements in the creation of our current government and constitution. She goes into detail factoring in people's beliefs and views to help generalize an individual's standpoint on an issue. In the book, Ms. Berkin is trying to argue that the creation of the constitution was not an easy process but was very tedious work. The book A Brilliant Solution is divided into many chapters but its best summarized in the parts starting…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays