Federalist No. 13 Dbq

Improved Essays
17. Why were women left out of the Constitution?
One reason women were left out of the Constitution was that the delegates at the Constitutional Convention were less concerned with individual rights than with making government more efficient. In a respect women were not actually left out of the Constitution because the Constitution was written to be as free of gender bias as eighteenth-century would allow. Another reason was the women’s political rights had not yet become an issue.

18. How is the Constitution amended? Make sure you know both steps and who may be involved in the process.
Stage one in amending the Constitution is that amendments may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress, or a constitutional convention
…show more content…
The Anti-Federalists argued that a stronger national government must be accompanied by explicit safeguards against tyranny. The Anti-Federalists supported states’ rights.

20. What were the Federalists Papers and why were they so critical to ratification of the Constitution?
The Federalist Papers consist of eighty-five essays that provided rhetorical ammunition to those supporting ratification. Their immediate purpose was to influence the delegates to the New York convention, where ratification was in trouble. The Federalist Papers have profoundly affected the way Americans then and now have understood their government.

21. What does Federalist No. 10 argue?
Federalist No. 10 responds to the Antifederalists argument that a “large republic” cannot long survive. Madison set out the task of devising a republic in which a majority of citizens will be unable to tyrannize the minority. Madison says the rotten apple is factions. Factions are defined as a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community. Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 51 Summary

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Madison wrote the Federalist Paper No. 51 specifically to explain to the readers how this new government makes liberty possible. He explains the various checks and balances that have been placed in order to ensure that not one specific branch would have too much power. The Federalist appeared in many different New York newspapers such as The New York Journal and The Daily Advertiser. The Federalist essays were written as responses to the many antifederalist opinions against the Constitution and they were originally intended to be only twenty essays long but were instead continued due to the continued criticisms of the Constitution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist Paper number ten was written by James Madison to guard against the issues of factions. In any society there will be factions, people with different ideals, religions, and points of view. In a republic this creates the problem of the mob rule, where only to opinion of the majority matters and the rights of the smaller groups are not protected. This is similar to Federalist Paper number nine in which he addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the failures of the Articles of Confederation, it was clear to the members of the Second Constitutional Convention that serious revisions to our government were necessary to have a prosperous nation. Thus the Constitution, with clear distinctions to the Articles, was drafted. James Madison, often cited as the Father of the Constitution, in conjunction with several other Federalist, like Alexander Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to persuade members of Congress and the states to ratify the document. Noted by history as two of the most influential pieces from the collection, The Federalist Papers, Federalist 10 and Federalist 51 stand out by there clear and persuasive arguments as to why and how a strong national government would protect its citizens.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    it was written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay in New york. The entire point of the federalist paper was to gain support for the constitution On the other hand the anti federalists were against the signing of the constitution. The anti federalists believed that the national government had too much power. Anti federalists wanted more state power.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Madison thinks that the Republic proposed in the Constitution is what America needs. There are enough congressional representatives that a few dissenters will not have a large impact on the government, but there are not so many representatives that the government fails to give the people what they want. The checks and balances put into place on the branches of this government help to ensure that the citizens have rights and a say in the government, but they do not have so much control over the government that it threatens the social order of the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through these papers the Federalists explained their views on important disputed issues and garnered support for ratifying the…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists believed that “the Constitution was required in order to safeguard the liberty independence that the American Revolution had created.” The Federalists were organized and had many celebrity support and they advertised their agenda to the public. The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, were formulated to encourage New Yorkers to ratify the Constitution. The Federalists insisted that the greatest threat to the United States’ future was the surplus of democracy that triggered Shay’s Rebellion among other major disturbances and they supported the abandonment of the Articles of Confederation. The main detractors of the Constitution are the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists The feud between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist party was based on the ratification of the Constitution. Even though both groups believed that the principal purpose of government is to secure individual rights and that the best instrument for that purpose is some form of limited republican government. They also agreed that the individual has the right to do anything that the government has no power to keep him from doing.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Founding Fathers Problems

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    a majority would be the most dangerous of all factions that might arise, for the majority would be the most capable of gaining complete ascendancy.” (Page 11) To combat a situation like this, the Founding Fathers wanted a federal government with a stronghold on all states. This would make the country stronger as a unit. If a problem sprang up in a certain area, those people don’t have to deal with it alone.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    10 and No. 51 assume that it is in our human nature to be selfish. In Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison states that factions will always exist. The only way to prevent a faction from being too powerful is to have numerous factions competing with one another. Democracy and self­interest creates factions. Federalist Paper No. 10 gives specific ways to eliminate the negative effects that factions create.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays