Pro Life Research Paper

Improved Essays
Introduction Being able to make a life long decision such pro life or pro choice is a very controversial topic in the United States. Pro life oppose abortions meaning once that moment of fertilization happens this is a new human life who has the same rights as other human beings. Whereas pro choice agree that women should have the right to abortion if she wishes to have one rather than the government make health care reproductive choices for her. People who consider themselves as pro-choice agree with the Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade (1973) that fought against the Texas criminal abortion laws. The Texas criminal abortion law states that it is a criminal act to terminate a pregnancy if the case is not to benefit the mother’s health. This …show more content…
Before this ban passed with Congress, cases where medical providers and their clients were seeking to sue as it conflicted with the constitution like the Nebraska ban. Another case that opposed the federal Abortion Ban is Gonzales v. Carhart (2007) which shares the same issues as Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood (2007). After review of lower courts both cases has been reviewed by Supreme Court where the case where merged as one before a three judge panel. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the 2003 Act ban all abortions due to the lack of details of the different types of abortions as its unconstitutional as it can put the mother’s health at …show more content…
This act creates an undue burden on women as its consider a felon charge for doctors to preform a dilation and evacuation (“D&E”) abortions which is one of the most common and safer second-trimester abortions. This 2003 Ban Act forces doctors to go against their best medical judgement as it 's unconstitutionally vague and narrowly constructed.

Decision and Reasons In a 5 to 4 vote, the Ninth Circuit court came to a decision that the 2003 partial-birth abortion ban is was a violation of the constitution on its face. Since the ruling the law needs to take into account of necessary steps to protect pregnant women’s health. The reason behind this ruling due to the Act being too vague, put an burden on woman’s reproductive choice of a second-trimester abortion and lacked exception to health that came as a to Stenberg v Carhart

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Also, a person taking away another person’s rights is illegal. And the right to choose what happens with your body should include having an abortion or not. Another argument pro-life people would have is that it is obviously risky for the mom. Having an abortion can result in complications in the mother’s future health, like he risk of ectopic pregnancies doubles, and the chance of a miscarriage and pelvic inflammatory disease also increases. (Lowen) I would argue that it’s risky either way.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state of Texas argued their right to “regulate moral behavior,” while Norma McCorvey, under the pseudonym Jane Roe, argued that the Texas ban on abortions, with the exception that the mother’s life is at risk, was unconstitutional. Ultimately, the court ruling was monumental because the Supreme Court ruled that the law was indeed unconstitutional. Today, the issue is still debated, rather vehemently – ranging from extreme pro-life to extreme pro-abortion. Essentially, the debate between a woman’s right over her own body and the unborn child’s right to life is the key factor. Is the baby a human being yet, especially in the first-third trimester?…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mary warren argues in her article "On the moral and legal status of abortion. ", that abortion is admissible under certain circumstances. She claims that even if the fetus is a human being and has a right to life, that right to life is overruled by a woman’s right to control what happens to her own body. Taking away that right is a violation to ones civil rights. If the government were to take away women’s right regarding reproductive choices, by forcing a woman to continue an unwanted pregnancy.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In conclusion, the topic of abortion raises a huge argument whether or not the unborn child has the right to live or not. Yeah some mothers might not be suitable to have a baby but, that doesn 't mean you have to kill it. Although abortion may be the only route out if it concerns the health of the mother in some situations, people may argue that abortion should not be the easy way out for those who failed to take responsibility. Until we figure out that abortion should be illegal millions of babies will…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction The Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey case, resulted in women’s basic liberties being overtaken by the state’s interests. As a result, states can continue to restrict a women from having an abortion after their interpretation of when fetal viability occurs. The court’s ruling ultimately is unconstitutional, as the basic reproductive rights have been taken away from women. The state’s interest in the development of unborn fetuses, along with their interpretations of when viability occurs, ultimately infringes upon women’s liberties that are granted by the fourteenth amendment. Therefore, it is imperative that states eradicate any restrictions preventing women from being the sole determinate in the outcome of their unborn fetus(s) until after its birth.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People that are pro-life believe that abortion should be made illegal once again because it is the killing of babies. People that are pro-choice believe that abortion should be kept legal because women have the right to make the choice. Since at the time of abortion, the fetus isn’t technically a baby, the pro-life views seem unreasonable to pro-choice supporters. There is a reason that the abortions are only allowed to happen within the first 24 weeks; the ‘fetus’, which is still a clump of cells at that point, can’t survive on its own outside the…

    • 1290 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “No woman can call herself free who does not control her own body.” According to Margaret Sanger, a sex educator and birth control activist, a women should be allowed to abort her child if she desires to do so. Abortion is the removal of an embryo or fetus from the uterus in order to end a pregnancy. Abortion was legalized in the United States in 1973 through Roe V. Wade by the single pregnant women Jane Roe. Since then, this topic has always been controversial with some arguing for and others against abortion. Some Americans believe abortion to be murder and restrict it however they don't realize the effects a termination denial can have on a woman and her health.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion has been a very controversial and sensitive topic since the legalization of the procedure in 1988. Those in favour of legal abortions are considered pro-choice, while those who oppose are pro-life. Douglas Groothius’s short essay titled “Why I am pro-life, a short, non-sectarian argument” briefly explains his perspective on abortion. Groothius believes the procedure should be illegal under nearly all circumstances, with only one exception: if the pregnancy is threatening to the mother’s life. Groothius considers abortion to be murder, as abortion is the surgical or chemical removal of a fetus from the mother, thus killing the fetus.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Texas HB3994 makes judicial bypass only apply to minors who are in danger of sexual abuse as a result, effectively eliminating emotional and sexual abuse from consideration (Texas Abortion Laws). The bill also extends the amount of time a judge has to rule on the case, which again could push a women past the gestational age limit (Texas Abortion Laws). This has been criticized because filing for judicial bypass seems to be a demanding and expensive task to expect a minor to achieve by themselves. Additionally the bill forces abortion clinics to discontinue the use of medicated abortions (Texas Abortion…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A common argument for people who argue that abortion should not be legal is that they think abortion is a murder. Although there are laws about when women are able to do an abortion, some people still think it is a murder if they do an abortion early in the pregnancy since they refer to it as a life. In addition, the people who think that abortion should be illegal say that the unborn babies are human and have a right to life, and when pregnant women make an abortion they take away the right to life for the baby. Another argument that is used by the people who are against abortion is how it is morally wrong to do an abortion, it is similar to the previous arguments since the people who are against abortion think that it is morally wrong to not give birth to a child that a woman is pregnant with and not give it a life that it has the right to. Although there are many arguments about how abortion should not be legal, there are also arguments about why abortion should be legal.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays